• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

Extracts from this document...


Theory of Knowledge External Assessment Question # 2: Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions? Name: Shay Sidelnik Word Count: 1521 Date: November 8th, 2007 Although reason and emotions can be perceived as completely opposite human traits, they are in fact very closely related. These two traits influence each other, and in one way or another help shape each other. Reason is often related to the brain while emotions are related more to the heart. Reason comes from the logical part of the human, reasonable things are things that makes sense in an individual's mind, things that are logical. Emotions on the other hand, tend to be much less logical; they are inner feelings which in many cases are very unreasonable, and inexplicable. Yet, it is common that the emotions of a person influence that person's reason. Both reason and emotion are necessary in justifying moral decisions. Moral decisions are simple decisions where each individual makes the distinction between what is right and what is wrong. Since emotions are very often unreasonable the ideal would be that people justify their moral decisions by reason and reason alone. ...read more.


The idea of killing somebody first rises from a strong feeling of hate towards that person. Yet another proof that emotions influence every decision humans make. That being true all this moral decisions made by utilitarian people, which are justified through reason are in fact not reasonable, hence another prove that reason alone cannot be the only tool used in justifying moral decisions and emotions must be used as well. There also exists the more emotional oriented type of people who will listen more to their emotions and justify their moral decisions mostly through their emotions rather than reason. An ethical theory, which praises emotions over reason, is the ethics of care theory. This is a theory which was developed by a psychologist named Caron Gilligan. This theory emphasizes the importance of relationships. It basically says that an individual's moral decisions should be made according to what is best for him and those closest to him, not for the majority of people. Since this theory puts emphasize on relationships it puts emphasize on emotions. Relationships are created through emotional connection, thus when a moral decision is decided according to what is best for one's friends and family that moral decision is being made by that person's feelings. ...read more.


Furthermore this was the last game of his remarkable carrier, this action leaves Zidane's legacy with a huge mark, and from all rational perspectives this was not a rational action. Yet Zidane insists that his decision was morally correct, furthermore he says that if he was to go back in time he would not change a thing. According to Zidane the remarks made about his sister were too painful to just let go, he chose to listen to his emotions instead of his reason, and take an action which might seem unreasonable but to him was morally correct because of his hurt emotions. Zidane who was always known for his very reasonable behavior on the football pitch decided to follow his emotions instead, which serves as another proof that both emotions and reason are used in the making and justification of moral decisions. Although in the ideal world moral decisions would only be justified by reason, this is not the ideal world and emotions do exist (which is probably a good thing), and thus both emotions and reason are necessary in justifying moral decisions. Since neither one of this traits can be ignored by humans, they are both necessary in justifying moral decisions and the degree of their necessity simply depends on the individual who is justifying the moral decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. "On the Rainy River" Essay Analysis

    Since you are young you often believe that everything your parents say and do is always right and you look up to that. When you do something wrong your parents are always quick to correct you and show you that what you have done is not right.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    There is also a second branch of utilitarianism - Rule Utilitarianism where it is argued that morality ought not to be judged on the consequences of an action (teleological) but instead upon the rules (deontological) that will produced the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers.

  1. Euthanasia can never be justified

    Destroy not yourselves. Surely Allah is ever merciful to you. Surah 4:29 Prophet Mohammed warned Muslims that those who commit suicide will go to hell. He said that if one is suffering they should turn to Allah for help. O ye who believe seek help with patient perseverance and Prayer; surely Allah is with those who patiently persevere.

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    of that person's character, rather than the actions of the individual and the consequences of his or her actions. Becoming virtuous requires practice. I believe, as an ethical theory, virtue ethics better accounts for good leadership than either utilitarianism or other rule-based systems.

  1. "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far ...

    Logic also allows us to determine which is more important, instantaneous happiness or long term happiness. Most people will agree that long term happiness will be far better than an instantaneous happiness, because an instantaneous happiness will vanish very

  2. I have raised myself to a state of affluence and some degree of reputation ...

    that he puts qualities associated with producing social and economic affluence above those that truly characterize moral values-just as he put retribution above honesty and good conscience with his boss Keimer. Franklin's underlying definition of moral perfection is best explained by contrasting it with a Puritan's definition.

  1. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    Utilitarianism exists also in the form of act and rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is situational, where every action is judged in its own circumstances in order to reach a morally correct conclusion. In the form of act, utilitarianism has the ability to be flexible in that it doesn't allow the definition of pleasure or happiness to be limited.

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making moral decisions?

    Although we cannot know what conscience is in absolute terms. There is lots of evidence to suggest that humanity does have an almost instinctive tendency to make moral judgements. These judgements are based upon both our intuition and our power of reason.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work