• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"True" and "false" seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhabit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Linda Lapina ToK essay 3 Word count: 1413 "True" and "false" seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhabit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two. What are the difficulties of the attempts to draw a clear line between the two categories? We have to make choices every day, and a lot of them are connected with what to believe in, what to accept as knowledge, or whom to trust. Most of us need some basic truths to base our lives upon. Inevitably, we have to determine whether something is true or false. Sometimes these choices seem obvious and some assertions- self-evident truths. In other occasions, on the contrary, the choice is much harder to make. The choice between accepting something as true or denying it and the certainty that we have in making this choice are dependant on numerous factors. These factors can generally be divided in two large groups- rational and irrational factors. In other words, sometimes we can grant logical proof and valid arguments for regarding something as true; in another time, we can accept something as true even without any rational proof. It seems that it should be easy to distinguish true and false with these numerous criterions available. In this essay, I will focus on the reasons why in the reality the choice between true and false is often made with many difficulties. ...read more.

Middle

However, later I checked the expiry date. It had passed two years ago. So we bought a new bottle of spray, and this time, ants were gone for good. This shows how insufficient facts can lead to false conclusions. Most of us trust in our experiences when making decisions. It is clear that others' experiences might be misleading- even if they are not deliberately deceiving us, their experiences may lead us to false conclusions just like our own. We might have seen rain in all the summer solstices that we remember; however, it is not enough to form a statement "summer solstice is always rainy", because we simply haven't seen all solstices. Experience alone is rarely enough to distinguish true and false, using it, it is likely to get into logical fallacies. When mentioning reliable sources of information, the first question is- which sources are reliable, then? Critically thinking, we have to admit that there are no sources that are 100% reliable. It is similar as with experiences of others- even if we are not lied to, we cannot trust others, for we cannot completely trust ourselves. Even equipment can be unreliable- all tools and machines can be faulty, even computers. For example, signalisation may also not go off; radars can miss an enemy plane with a special protection, and so on. Even when the calculations we make are correct and should lead us to a true result, in the real life (apart from mathematical exercises) ...read more.

Conclusion

An example is Middle Ages, when Catholic Church refused to accept that the Earth is round and tired to silence anyone who could prove the opposite. Intuition (and other such things- like sixth sense or extrasensory perception) is another way of giving us unreasonable judgements of true and false. It differs from the other irrational criterions by being supernatural- only some believe in these things and even fewer deem to have the ability to use these "powers". It is a controversial point of whether we can trust them or no, and attitudes towards them are very different, but it is clear that they have nothing to do with logics. It is clear that these irrational criterions may sometimes be determinant, but not very reliable components in deciding what is true or false. That is why they often create a lot of difficulties to approach the world reasonably and logically and form true knowledge. The rational factors that were discussed earlier are more reliable, but then again, as it was shown, even if we judge logically and process the obtained information rationally, there is no guarantee that the information itself is entirely true. That is why it is extremely difficult to form unquestionably TRUE knowledge or to distinguish true and false. Even if our mind is processing the facts and other information correctly, our perception and other ways of knowing can prove deceitful; often different ways of knowing and areas of knowledge can give us contradicting information. Every source of knowledge can turn out unreliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Free essay

    'True' and 'False' seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    For religion, it seems that there is either no such thing as 'true' and 'false' or both terms represent the same meaning. The "fuzzy area" between true and false can also be found in art. Photography for instance, can be perceived as something when it is really something else.

  2. How are the sources of knowledge used in 'Blood Wedding', 'Love in the Time ...

    Doctors are regarded as of extremely high rank in the society as they fight against Cholera. "...Dr. Juvenal Urbino had followed a set routine and achieved a respectability and prestige that had no equal in the province" (Page 8) Finally, the last source of knowledge that Neruda visited is Gossip (Death).

  1. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    Therefore that witness knows something that has not yet been proven true. What a human being knows, is only a minute fraction, of the available knowledge of today. One must be able to preserve his or her knowledge, and pass it to later generations.

  2. 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

    In fact we do not often question our knowledge, we do now question whether 2+2=4 or whether the sun will rise in the morning,

  1. "By discovering something new, a character can change for the better." Is this ...

    Frode did not consider the cards to be of equal intelligence to him, he took them for granted and underestimated their abilities- he certainly did not think that they would one day punish him through murder!. The language used in this novel is simple to understand, however this contrasts with

  2. Theory of Knowledge.

    The Chinese and Greeks have a traditional folklore explaining such an event of big flood? This shows that a big flood did happen and all civilizations tried to explain it. Noah's journey could very well be true but of course the story in the bible is not true.

  1. "God may have separated the heavens from the earth - He did not separate ...

    Even the word science was transformed and received a new acceptation and specific meaning as referring particularly to mathematics and phenomena of nature. In the last part of the XVII century it replaced another term that has been used for such purpose since antiquity and was still in use at the time: Natural philosophy, a term that nobody uses now.

  2. Right – Wrong / True – False / Reality – Perjury

    I have not seen any evidence that the universe I live in is ruled over by a number of gods. The idea of many imperfect gods ruling over the universe is terribly frightful. Apparently Gilgamesh was not even supposed to live through the flood, but by the manipulations of other

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work