• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'True' and 'False' seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhibit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

Free essay example:

‘True’ and ‘False’ seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhibit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

In life, people need to label everything as a reason to communicate with each other regardless of which language they speak. It is also necessary to label everything because society has the desire to know what different objects are and how they work. As well as having a name, we also class things as being true or false which are terms that do not coincide and are two words which express opposing concepts. As humans we have accepted these facts but there are different situations where and object can be seen as both true and false depending on its perceivers.

Religion has been around for centuries, in many different cultures and has been practised throughout the world. People in every religion have beliefs which differ from other religions, and they believe that their religion is the truth. In this situation, you have many groups all believing the ‘truth’ but also thinking the other religions are inaccurate or wrong. So, technically there are many truths, and true and false do coincide through two or more different views. If this is the case, shouldn’t everything be classified as ‘true’? If people can believe in different things and knowing it is the ‘truth’ with others believing otherwise, then wouldn’t this confusion of ‘true’ and ‘false’ be the same in all situations? For religion, it seems that there is either no such thing as ‘true’ and ‘false’ or both terms represent the same meaning.

The “fuzzy area” between true and false can also be found in art. Photography for instance, can be perceived as something when it is really something else. With programs, such as Photoshop, you can change a photo to appear nothing like its initial image. You can create a truth which is not the ‘real’ truth. The final modified product is real, as in it is a picture which a person had made, and it is a real image, something anyone can see and it is not in someone’s imagination, however, the picture is not ‘true’ as it displays a non truthful image, not the real image of how things looked when the photograph was taken. So this is another instance where ‘true’ and ‘false’ overlap and it can also be the same with an artist painting a picture reflecting a variety of ideas, emotions or places which to them is all true because it is their way of expressing themselves. And as it is on an object such as a canvas, everyone can see it. But another person could perceive the picture differently, and to the observer their idea of the image is true, but to the artist, the new idea of what the picture represents is false.

As like ‘true’ and ‘false’, science and religion are seen as opposites. They just have major conflicts of who is right and wrong. God created the world and the universe is based on the beliefs of the religious, but where is the proof? Scientists seem to have explained to the fullest how the universe was created and how our solar system started with the “Big Bang” theory, which for me, coming from a non-religious background makes more sense, but it appears that human kind have just accepted this theory without questioning. How do they know their theory is ‘true’? How does anyone know that either theory is ‘true’? What if the confirmation of the scientist’s theory is false? But then again, it is only a ‘theory’, and scientists decided on the “Big Bang” theory probably because it is a theory which closely relates to science and how the rest of the world works. Society also needed an explanation which had a greater amount of evidence than just religious beliefs to understand more and expand their knowledge. Even if neither science nor religion is true, people can make up their own minds, deciding what’s true and false according to their background and other external influences.

What a person knows, they believe that what they know is true. They have gained this knowledge by past experiences, what they have been told, how they feel towards a situation and all these ways of knowing establish their belief in what is true and false. Their views and beliefs may differ from everyone else’s but to the individual what they know is true. For any one thing, it can have many appearances which give people the freedom and opportunity to decide what it is, how it got there, why it’s there and so on. The difference between true and false depends on the person believing or disbelieving it by their gathered information of their ways of knowing through perception, emotion, language and reason.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Religious Studies (Philosophy & Ethics) Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    Irenaeus' belief of being in God's image meant that you have intelligence, morality and personality, yet it lacked completion. He believed that to be complete, it would only be gained by transforming into God's likeness. Irenaeus claimed that evil was an essential means to effect this alteration.

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence

    Science is a form of empirialism. It is the search of truth based on experience. Scientists aspire to prove theories based on other truths that have already been proven. The truths of science should be agreed upon by any thinkers in the universe that observe the same regular phenomena.

  1. Truth and unconditional truth

    Nevertheless, when a liar tells the truth, then this truth becomes a lie, or does it? This is an absurd problem because every time you try to find out what is the real truth you end up contradicting yourself. Albert Einstein once said, "The search for truth is more precious

  2. 'God is not real?'

    We can not see this however we still believe. This principle can be applied to the existence of God; just because we can not see God, this does not mean that he does not exist. View points against the existence of God: The concept of suffering can be applied as an argument against the being of God.

  1. Looking at the views of two different religions about the same topic, 'life after ...

    He also emphasised that God is able to do whatever he wants to do. Above God addresses a man as brainless in a way because he just believes in what he sees and never goes beyond. In the verse below He addresses them and says: "And they say: 'what is there but our lives in this world?

  2. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    Could the theories and the witness accounts be true? How can we tell the difference between someone who is lying and someone who is telling us what he really saw, felt, or heard? The only way we can resolve these mysteries, is to let time do the job for us.

  1. 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

    This, combined with his own imperial proof, in seeing that the horizon of the ocean was indeed rounded, were all part of his proof, which led to his knowledge. Similarly Galileo Galilei turned his belief into knowledge as he famously said after many years of study: 'eppur si muove' which translated means 'and yet it moves'.

  2. "True" and "false" seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    For example, for many centuries, people believed that the earth is flat and that mice originate from dirty laundry. Today we recognize that what they considered scientific proof, was simply irrelevant, but this makes us realize how short=lived scientific proof may be over time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work