• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'True' and 'False' seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhibit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

Free essay example:

‘True’ and ‘False’ seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhibit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

In life, people need to label everything as a reason to communicate with each other regardless of which language they speak. It is also necessary to label everything because society has the desire to know what different objects are and how they work. As well as having a name, we also class things as being true or false which are terms that do not coincide and are two words which express opposing concepts. As humans we have accepted these facts but there are different situations where and object can be seen as both true and false depending on its perceivers.

Religion has been around for centuries, in many different cultures and has been practised throughout the world. People in every religion have beliefs which differ from other religions, and they believe that their religion is the truth. In this situation, you have many groups all believing the ‘truth’ but also thinking the other religions are inaccurate or wrong. So, technically there are many truths, and true and false do coincide through two or more different views. If this is the case, shouldn’t everything be classified as ‘true’? If people can believe in different things and knowing it is the ‘truth’ with others believing otherwise, then wouldn’t this confusion of ‘true’ and ‘false’ be the same in all situations? For religion, it seems that there is either no such thing as ‘true’ and ‘false’ or both terms represent the same meaning.

The “fuzzy area” between true and false can also be found in art. Photography for instance, can be perceived as something when it is really something else. With programs, such as Photoshop, you can change a photo to appear nothing like its initial image. You can create a truth which is not the ‘real’ truth. The final modified product is real, as in it is a picture which a person had made, and it is a real image, something anyone can see and it is not in someone’s imagination, however, the picture is not ‘true’ as it displays a non truthful image, not the real image of how things looked when the photograph was taken. So this is another instance where ‘true’ and ‘false’ overlap and it can also be the same with an artist painting a picture reflecting a variety of ideas, emotions or places which to them is all true because it is their way of expressing themselves. And as it is on an object such as a canvas, everyone can see it. But another person could perceive the picture differently, and to the observer their idea of the image is true, but to the artist, the new idea of what the picture represents is false.

As like ‘true’ and ‘false’, science and religion are seen as opposites. They just have major conflicts of who is right and wrong. God created the world and the universe is based on the beliefs of the religious, but where is the proof? Scientists seem to have explained to the fullest how the universe was created and how our solar system started with the “Big Bang” theory, which for me, coming from a non-religious background makes more sense, but it appears that human kind have just accepted this theory without questioning. How do they know their theory is ‘true’? How does anyone know that either theory is ‘true’? What if the confirmation of the scientist’s theory is false? But then again, it is only a ‘theory’, and scientists decided on the “Big Bang” theory probably because it is a theory which closely relates to science and how the rest of the world works. Society also needed an explanation which had a greater amount of evidence than just religious beliefs to understand more and expand their knowledge. Even if neither science nor religion is true, people can make up their own minds, deciding what’s true and false according to their background and other external influences.

What a person knows, they believe that what they know is true. They have gained this knowledge by past experiences, what they have been told, how they feel towards a situation and all these ways of knowing establish their belief in what is true and false. Their views and beliefs may differ from everyone else’s but to the individual what they know is true. For any one thing, it can have many appearances which give people the freedom and opportunity to decide what it is, how it got there, why it’s there and so on. The difference between true and false depends on the person believing or disbelieving it by their gathered information of their ways of knowing through perception, emotion, language and reason.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Religious Studies (Philosophy & Ethics) Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Looking at the views of two different religions about the same topic, 'life after ...

    They don't even perceive how and when they will be resurrected." (27:65) In Quran Allah also mentions: "Those who disbelieve said, 'after we turn into dust, and also our parents, do we get brought out?" (27:67) In the verse above God answers disbelievers by saying: "He produces the live from

  2. Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good ...

    pursuit of all knowledge because we never know what knowledge will be useful and what won't. As one of the physics professors I met in UBC has said: Scientists have to keep on exploring even if they have not realized what a certain line of research can lead to, simply because it might be useful sometime in the future.

  1. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    Sometime in the future we will have the possibility to prove whether what we think of today as absolutely impossible and absurd, will be proven to be true, with the help of technology and other 'close encounters'. The cause for this mass scepticism, is that some people might recognise certain

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence

    This is because scientific knowledge must be based on solid evidence. Scientists seek to prove a hypothesis through the experience of experiments and observation. The goal of science is to discover patterns in nature, and has a very effective way of acquiring knowledge from observations of those patterns.

  1. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    This mirrors the idea that every generation was seminally present in Adam and so every generation is guilty because they inherit his guilt for disobeying God. Augustine concluded his theodicy with a reminder of God's grace: if God were simply just, everyone would go to his or her rightful punishment in hell.

  2. "By discovering something new, a character can change for the better." Is this ...

    He has encountered a personally spiritual discovery about the world that surrounds him. He hears the Mariner's speech and finds out about compassion in life, punishment, the glory of God's creatures and about the unpleasantness of being alone. In this instance, the Wedding Guest has changed not only for the better but also for the worse.

  1. Compare the respective approaches of rationalism and empiricism towards a theory of knowledge ...

    Body - Corporeal So the question turned to be, "How can something incorporeal, interact wit something corporeal?" Empiricism Empiricists went against the ideas of the rationalists, about innate ideas.

  2. Right – Wrong / True – False / Reality – Perjury

    Some of the differences that stand out are details of measurement. In the Gilgamesh epic we are told that rain fell for six days and six nights. While in the Genesis account, Noah experienced 40 day and 40 nights of intense rain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work