• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'True' and 'False' seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhibit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

Free essay example:

‘True’ and ‘False’ seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually exclusive. In reality, however, we may inhibit, in much or even most of our knowledge, the fuzzy area between the two.

In life, people need to label everything as a reason to communicate with each other regardless of which language they speak. It is also necessary to label everything because society has the desire to know what different objects are and how they work. As well as having a name, we also class things as being true or false which are terms that do not coincide and are two words which express opposing concepts. As humans we have accepted these facts but there are different situations where and object can be seen as both true and false depending on its perceivers.

Religion has been around for centuries, in many different cultures and has been practised throughout the world. People in every religion have beliefs which differ from other religions, and they believe that their religion is the truth. In this situation, you have many groups all believing the ‘truth’ but also thinking the other religions are inaccurate or wrong. So, technically there are many truths, and true and false do coincide through two or more different views. If this is the case, shouldn’t everything be classified as ‘true’? If people can believe in different things and knowing it is the ‘truth’ with others believing otherwise, then wouldn’t this confusion of ‘true’ and ‘false’ be the same in all situations? For religion, it seems that there is either no such thing as ‘true’ and ‘false’ or both terms represent the same meaning.

The “fuzzy area” between true and false can also be found in art. Photography for instance, can be perceived as something when it is really something else. With programs, such as Photoshop, you can change a photo to appear nothing like its initial image. You can create a truth which is not the ‘real’ truth. The final modified product is real, as in it is a picture which a person had made, and it is a real image, something anyone can see and it is not in someone’s imagination, however, the picture is not ‘true’ as it displays a non truthful image, not the real image of how things looked when the photograph was taken. So this is another instance where ‘true’ and ‘false’ overlap and it can also be the same with an artist painting a picture reflecting a variety of ideas, emotions or places which to them is all true because it is their way of expressing themselves. And as it is on an object such as a canvas, everyone can see it. But another person could perceive the picture differently, and to the observer their idea of the image is true, but to the artist, the new idea of what the picture represents is false.

As like ‘true’ and ‘false’, science and religion are seen as opposites. They just have major conflicts of who is right and wrong. God created the world and the universe is based on the beliefs of the religious, but where is the proof? Scientists seem to have explained to the fullest how the universe was created and how our solar system started with the “Big Bang” theory, which for me, coming from a non-religious background makes more sense, but it appears that human kind have just accepted this theory without questioning. How do they know their theory is ‘true’? How does anyone know that either theory is ‘true’? What if the confirmation of the scientist’s theory is false? But then again, it is only a ‘theory’, and scientists decided on the “Big Bang” theory probably because it is a theory which closely relates to science and how the rest of the world works. Society also needed an explanation which had a greater amount of evidence than just religious beliefs to understand more and expand their knowledge. Even if neither science nor religion is true, people can make up their own minds, deciding what’s true and false according to their background and other external influences.

What a person knows, they believe that what they know is true. They have gained this knowledge by past experiences, what they have been told, how they feel towards a situation and all these ways of knowing establish their belief in what is true and false. Their views and beliefs may differ from everyone else’s but to the individual what they know is true. For any one thing, it can have many appearances which give people the freedom and opportunity to decide what it is, how it got there, why it’s there and so on. The difference between true and false depends on the person believing or disbelieving it by their gathered information of their ways of knowing through perception, emotion, language and reason.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE Religious Studies (Philosophy & Ethics) Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Compare the respective approaches of rationalism and empiricism towards a theory of knowledge ...

    based on the idea that all knowledge comes from the senses, so to a empiricist, shouldn't this be the most certain rather than indecisive. Berkeley thought that objects did not possess power. The only reason that the object exists is because we perceive.

  2. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    Irenaeus' answer to the question why evil is necessary and why God didn't simply create humans perfectly to begin with is that he believed that attaining the likeness of God requires the "willing cooperation of human individuals." Willing cooperation requires genuine freedom; we cannot willingly cooperate with something if we are being forced into it.

  1. Looking at the views of two different religions about the same topic, 'life after ...

    the dead, and produces the dead from the live, and he revives the land after it had died, you are similarly resurrected." (30:19) God has given the answer by giving the example of land saying "he revives the land after it had been died," to help understand the term consider

  2. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    witness accounts as absolute nonsense, but that is simply because they do not consider this as a reliable source of evidence for such an event. Therefore they conclude that this certain thing never happened, and therefore if has not been proven true.

  1. 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

    true globally, as it is empirical proof and therefore considered more valid than perhaps rational proofs. It is because of the very nature of proof that much of the knowledge we have could potentially be false. However, as we do not seek 100% certainty, we accept what we know to be true until proven otherwise.

  2. "True" and "false" seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    For example, for many centuries, people believed that the earth is flat and that mice originate from dirty laundry. Today we recognize that what they considered scientific proof, was simply irrelevant, but this makes us realize how short=lived scientific proof may be over time.

  1. "By discovering something new, a character can change for the better." Is this ...

    she claims that for years and years she had tried to find meaning and purpose to her life until one day the truth had all dawned upon her. Luisa's defining establishment did provide her with an answer to her speculations about life, however it also lead her to realise that

  2. Theory of Knowledge.

    Limitation of Knowledge: With these faith and beliefs in our society our it slows down the society to improve to the next level. Beliefs and faith into a prehistoric time hypothesis has been an obstacle into advancement of knowledge. Especially noting that these hypotheses came with a threat of eternal torture and pain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work