• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God? Many philosophers have attempted to prove the existence of God, although there is no argument as yet which proves without any doubt that God exists. A proof is the demonstration that something is true or, in this case, that God exists. There are 3 types of proof; direct, deductive, and inductive. A direct proof is when something is immediately obvious, so therefore, it cannot be used to prove God's existence. However, Inductive and Deductive Arguments could be used to prove the existence of God. An Inductive argument is a posteriori (based on experience) which is logic involving reasoning from effect to cause. Inductive arguments attempt to create and support a general conclusion based on some evidence (either physical or based on experience), without making it absolutely certain. The arguments cannot produce proofs that completely remove an element of doubt from the conclusion, so the conclusion does not follow the premises and therefore, certainty can no longer apply - Probability is used instead. Analogy can be used as a proof, e.g. ...read more.

Middle

Swinburne is said to have the humility to not seek absolute proof. His goal is to collect several weaker arguments (similar to the Cumulative effect) in order to prove that the existence of God is more probable than not. He has identified two different types of Inductive argument - P-inductive argument which makes the conclusion more probable than not, and C-inductive argument which uses even weaker arguments in order to make a more probable conclusion. Swinburne wants to accumulate a sufficient quantity of C-inductive arguments for theism, each of which will offer some support to his hypothesis, so that they will collectively constitute a good P-inductive argument, thus making the probability of the god hypothesis greater than one half. Whether he succeeds in achieving this is another matter. Deductive arguments are a priori - involving reasoning from effect to cause, and are arguments which make the conclusions certain, as long as the premises are accepted to be true. They are based on a series of assumptions, known as premises, and 'if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true' - this is known as a 'valid argument'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Using the passion argument, he said that passion is an essential feature of faith, and if God's existence if probable or proven, people would have less faith. Kant also said 'I had to set limits for knowledge in order to make place for faith'. Perhaps humans do not need to know everything, and therefore does it matter whether God's existence can be proven? There seem to be problems when trying to prove the existence of God using Inductive or Deductive proofs. Inductive proofs are seen to have un-certain conclusions, whereas Deductive proofs need for certainty can mean they are impossible to use. It is difficult to gather evidence for God's existence, and it has been questioned whether we are able to talk about God at all because he is so different from human experiences. Proof may be impossible, due to so many difficulties with any particular proof and because of the assumptions we make in order to prove things. These assumptions are that human reason is reliable and that our language actually corresponds to the common world. If this is not the case, then how can anything be proven? But perhaps, using Kant's argument, proof is not needed for the existence of God, because faith is more important. Laura Kantor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    Some people 'experience' God in their lives in quite a sudden and dramatic way, which usually results in a significant change in attitude and lifestyle. At times, God 'speaks' to people through thoughts and visions. At other times, God shows guidance through a holy book.

  2. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    The sins of Adam and Eve resulted in a loss of order within nature, destroying the delicate balance of the world, and distancing humanity from God. Since all humans were 'seminally present in the loins of Adam', we are all born with original sin.

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    > Is the concept of a necessary being meaningful? A key flaw with the argument according to David Hume and Bertrand Russell is that it relies on the idea that everyone is interested in finding such answers about the universe; like Bertrand Russell who says the universe doesn't need any

  2. Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, and assess its claim to ...

    Whereas Aquinas looked at the world around him and looked for sufficient reason. In a famous radio debate between Bertrand Russell and Fred Copleston ,broadcast in 1947, the Principle of sufficient reason was argued against Logical necessity. Copleston that an explanation was adequate to the existence of some particular being.

  1. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    God, therefore, would have the perfection of existence and it is impossible to think of God as not having it. God cannot not exist, and so must exist. Descartes maintained that existence belongs analytically to God; it is part of his definition, just as three sides are part of the definition of a triangle.

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    The very basic understanding derives from both St. Anselm's and Descartes' first ideas of the ontological argument. St. Anselm said that the concept of God is 'a being than which no greater can be conceived.' This leads to the conclusion that: God is a supremely perfect being; therefore existence is perfection and therefore God exists.

  1. The Existence of God

    If God doesn't exist nothing will happen, so it is only logical (according Pascal's Wager [Theory])

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    The fact that a machine needs a designer is part of our experience of being in the world, but we have no experience of making worlds, 'Have worlds ever been formed under your eye?' Hume is here attacking the inductive logic once more.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work