• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God? Many philosophers have attempted to prove the existence of God, although there is no argument as yet which proves without any doubt that God exists. A proof is the demonstration that something is true or, in this case, that God exists. There are 3 types of proof; direct, deductive, and inductive. A direct proof is when something is immediately obvious, so therefore, it cannot be used to prove God's existence. However, Inductive and Deductive Arguments could be used to prove the existence of God. An Inductive argument is a posteriori (based on experience) which is logic involving reasoning from effect to cause. Inductive arguments attempt to create and support a general conclusion based on some evidence (either physical or based on experience), without making it absolutely certain. The arguments cannot produce proofs that completely remove an element of doubt from the conclusion, so the conclusion does not follow the premises and therefore, certainty can no longer apply - Probability is used instead. Analogy can be used as a proof, e.g. ...read more.

Middle

Swinburne is said to have the humility to not seek absolute proof. His goal is to collect several weaker arguments (similar to the Cumulative effect) in order to prove that the existence of God is more probable than not. He has identified two different types of Inductive argument - P-inductive argument which makes the conclusion more probable than not, and C-inductive argument which uses even weaker arguments in order to make a more probable conclusion. Swinburne wants to accumulate a sufficient quantity of C-inductive arguments for theism, each of which will offer some support to his hypothesis, so that they will collectively constitute a good P-inductive argument, thus making the probability of the god hypothesis greater than one half. Whether he succeeds in achieving this is another matter. Deductive arguments are a priori - involving reasoning from effect to cause, and are arguments which make the conclusions certain, as long as the premises are accepted to be true. They are based on a series of assumptions, known as premises, and 'if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true' - this is known as a 'valid argument'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Using the passion argument, he said that passion is an essential feature of faith, and if God's existence if probable or proven, people would have less faith. Kant also said 'I had to set limits for knowledge in order to make place for faith'. Perhaps humans do not need to know everything, and therefore does it matter whether God's existence can be proven? There seem to be problems when trying to prove the existence of God using Inductive or Deductive proofs. Inductive proofs are seen to have un-certain conclusions, whereas Deductive proofs need for certainty can mean they are impossible to use. It is difficult to gather evidence for God's existence, and it has been questioned whether we are able to talk about God at all because he is so different from human experiences. Proof may be impossible, due to so many difficulties with any particular proof and because of the assumptions we make in order to prove things. These assumptions are that human reason is reliable and that our language actually corresponds to the common world. If this is not the case, then how can anything be proven? But perhaps, using Kant's argument, proof is not needed for the existence of God, because faith is more important. Laura Kantor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    If the world was good when God created it, as many Christians believe, there is the question as to why natural evil manifests itself in environmental disasters. According to St. Augustine of Hippo, evil was a result of angels who turned away from God, misused their freewill and tempted Adam and Eve.

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    In the metaphysical world it would be wrong to In my opinion one of the greatest boundaries we have to overcome is the presence of evil in the world. John Stuart Mill (1806 -1873) 'The Essence of God,' wrote, 'Next to the greatness of cosmic forces, the quality which most

  1. Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, and assess its claim to ...

    Mackie remarks that such justifications are not a priori as Aquinas argued. It is not justified that the purpose of a thing has to be explained. Things don't have instrinsic purposes, we give them to them, this undermines sufficient reason.

  2. "The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence"

    Instead, Aquinas thought the only way to prove God's existence was through a posteriori knowledge, because any argument for the existence of God has to be based on the evidence God leaves us in the world. Aquinas said that even if the argument succeeded to prove God's existence, it would

  1. Arguments about god.

    So you should not assume that...discussions as to what God is are always proceeding on a set of shared assumptions...' God is traditionally pictured as a man could he not be also seen as a woman? God also sometimes pictured as a ray of sunshine, or a person...

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    is so fantastic that it must have been created by a divine designer, is nothing but speculation and opinions. It cannot be proven either way. The reason this argument is so important, is because it came about at a time when the majority of people were happy with the idea

  1. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    It is natural to conclude that orderly things are produced by intelligence. We know from scientific evidence that the universe is complex; and we know through our own experience that the universe exhibits the same kind of complex order that houses, paintings and machines do.

  2. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    which contributes to our understanding of the nature of that thing - comparable to goodness, wisdom, or love. He therefore treats it as a predicate (a defining characteristic). Existence may be possessed or lacked, and it may be possessed in re or in intellectu.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work