• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham first developed the idea of utilitarianism after reading the phrase 'greatest good for the greatest number' in Joseph Priestley's Essay on Government. He had a desire to create a universal theory which would bring scientific certainty to ethics and eliminate moral disagreement. Utilitarianism can be defined in several ways and the principle has changed slightly since its conception. The definition is effectively that an action is deemed morally correct if it produces more happiness of all affected by it than any other alternative and wrong if it does not. Utilitarianism provides a clear method for deciding on a course of action that disregards personal confusion. Bentham's aim was to achieve a specific scientific formula to calculate how much pleasure and pain is produced from each proposed action. From this Bentham proposed the hedonic calculus which had seven criteria; intensity, duration, purity, extent, certainty, fecundity and remoteness. ...read more.


The majority of people would not have to suffer for the sake of a minority. However, does this justify causing pain to the minority of people? In theory, utilitarianism seems to be a good theory that is used in modern civilisations today in order to decide what would be the best course of action for the majority of people. Laws would be created for the people by the people and there is little chance that one person would hold all the power. However, when further analysed there are significant limitations. In order to make an action moral from a utilitarian point of view you must first predict what will happen as a result of the action that you take. This is an important weakness of the theory of utilitarianism as sometimes it can be near impossible to predict what will happen. ...read more.


Who would you pick out of the two people? This would prove a problem for a utilitarian because they have to consider how many people would be made happy by saving either their mum or the scientist. If they were to save the scientist then millions of people could be cured of cancer and this is generally what a utilitarian would choose but then you have let your own mother die. You have a special responsibility to your mum as she is your family and she brought you up and you both love each other. So this is a dilemma that some utilitarians may have to face. John Stuart Mill improved Bentham's utilitarian theory. He believed that there were different levels of pleasures that humans enjoy and pushed the emphasis from the quantity of pleasure to the quality. The higher pleasures of the mind are preferred to the lower pleasures of the body. As Mill states; 'It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics

    The virtue theorists at least talk about this important subject. Virtue theorists like St. Thomas Aquinas noticed long ago that the world works in a funny way. When we do things that are good, even when we do not much want to, the very act of doing the good thing

  2. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point ...

    the same they would most certainly find our culture just as immoral as we may find theirs. However, this is where cultural relativism shoots itself in the foot; it undermines any logical basis to justify that we should accept other cultures' behaviour, for if another country's culture believes that it

  1. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    The second reason why people adopt Emotivism is an argument that Thomson attributes to David Hume. Since she has already argued against the epistemological arguments for Moral Scepticism, she discusses the second reason.

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    how unreal the scenarios may seem it is more than possible that they will eventually happen, and even if they don't, we couldn't have predicted that they wouldn't in the first place. Another way that utilitarianism is unjust is that it allows for the ill treatment of others, for example slavery.

  1. Utilitarianism (Weaknesses and strengths)

    For Bentham an act is only right if it is instrumentally good (quality that leads to pleasure). The moral worth of an action over another action is proportional to the amount/quality of pleasure that one action brings. A more accurate account of the principle of utility would state: for all

  2. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    The duration will be short term for the poor man if he spends it all at once and it will be immediate. This calculation suggests that the poor man should keep the money despite it being morally wrong to steal.

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    Pleasure is notoriously difficult to measure, while people can always express their preferences, including those which may not cause them pleasure but are still important to them. It was devised by Jeremy Bentham and put forward in his book The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789).

  2. 'Explain how Act and Rule Utilitarianism differ.'

    Jeremy Bentham, the proponent of Act Utilitarianism argued for the principle of utility, because he believed that everyone had the right to happiness, irrespective of their situation in life. He argued that everyone counted equally in the assessment of the benefits of an action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work