• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham first developed the idea of utilitarianism after reading the phrase 'greatest good for the greatest number' in Joseph Priestley's Essay on Government. He had a desire to create a universal theory which would bring scientific certainty to ethics and eliminate moral disagreement. Utilitarianism can be defined in several ways and the principle has changed slightly since its conception. The definition is effectively that an action is deemed morally correct if it produces more happiness of all affected by it than any other alternative and wrong if it does not. Utilitarianism provides a clear method for deciding on a course of action that disregards personal confusion. Bentham's aim was to achieve a specific scientific formula to calculate how much pleasure and pain is produced from each proposed action. From this Bentham proposed the hedonic calculus which had seven criteria; intensity, duration, purity, extent, certainty, fecundity and remoteness. ...read more.


The majority of people would not have to suffer for the sake of a minority. However, does this justify causing pain to the minority of people? In theory, utilitarianism seems to be a good theory that is used in modern civilisations today in order to decide what would be the best course of action for the majority of people. Laws would be created for the people by the people and there is little chance that one person would hold all the power. However, when further analysed there are significant limitations. In order to make an action moral from a utilitarian point of view you must first predict what will happen as a result of the action that you take. This is an important weakness of the theory of utilitarianism as sometimes it can be near impossible to predict what will happen. ...read more.


Who would you pick out of the two people? This would prove a problem for a utilitarian because they have to consider how many people would be made happy by saving either their mum or the scientist. If they were to save the scientist then millions of people could be cured of cancer and this is generally what a utilitarian would choose but then you have let your own mother die. You have a special responsibility to your mum as she is your family and she brought you up and you both love each other. So this is a dilemma that some utilitarians may have to face. John Stuart Mill improved Bentham's utilitarian theory. He believed that there were different levels of pleasures that humans enjoy and pushed the emphasis from the quantity of pleasure to the quality. The higher pleasures of the mind are preferred to the lower pleasures of the body. As Mill states; 'It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    A very significant problem with utilitarianism is that fact that often the more utilitarian conclusion goes against justice. It would not be fair to kill an innocent man to restore order although this would create more net happiness. Utilitarianism is a straightforward way of making a decision.

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    Pleasure is notoriously difficult to measure, while people can always express their preferences, including those which may not cause them pleasure but are still important to them. It was devised by Jeremy Bentham and put forward in his book The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789).

  1. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    The Kantian answer would be not to steer away from the five workers because it would be unfair to use the one to the side as a means to save the others' lives. This is a tough case no matter how you look at it.

  2. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    where the greatest good results for the most number of people, Bentham introduced a procedure to estimate the utility of an action. The idea that he proposed is recognised as the Hedonic Calculus, whereby seven points can be referred to so to determine an action's value.

  1. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    This received much criticism from Victorian society as like Epicurius he commanded all to enjoy "swinish" pleasures, which were frowned upon by the educated classes at this time. Mill attempted to tackle this pitfall by acknowledging that there were higher and lower pleasures.

  2. Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics

    notion of a flourishing life--only it turns out that the flourishing life assumes a set of values, a set of standards already! So, appealing to the flourishing life only returns us to the original question: which moral standards should we adopt?

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Business managers, governors, as well as the other professionals also use this theory when they are making decisions, for example, whether to employ new staff, whether to ban smoking in public places, or whether to invest in a new market.

  2. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point ...

    Relativism is broken down into two main divisions therefore: firstly individual relativism, which states that we cannot even make moral judgments based on culture, but solely on the person involved, and their perception of morality. The latter is cultural relativism, which states that we cannot judge an actions morality without

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work