• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham first developed the idea of utilitarianism after reading the phrase 'greatest good for the greatest number' in Joseph Priestley's Essay on Government. He had a desire to create a universal theory which would bring scientific certainty to ethics and eliminate moral disagreement. Utilitarianism can be defined in several ways and the principle has changed slightly since its conception. The definition is effectively that an action is deemed morally correct if it produces more happiness of all affected by it than any other alternative and wrong if it does not. Utilitarianism provides a clear method for deciding on a course of action that disregards personal confusion. Bentham's aim was to achieve a specific scientific formula to calculate how much pleasure and pain is produced from each proposed action. From this Bentham proposed the hedonic calculus which had seven criteria; intensity, duration, purity, extent, certainty, fecundity and remoteness. ...read more.

Middle

The majority of people would not have to suffer for the sake of a minority. However, does this justify causing pain to the minority of people? In theory, utilitarianism seems to be a good theory that is used in modern civilisations today in order to decide what would be the best course of action for the majority of people. Laws would be created for the people by the people and there is little chance that one person would hold all the power. However, when further analysed there are significant limitations. In order to make an action moral from a utilitarian point of view you must first predict what will happen as a result of the action that you take. This is an important weakness of the theory of utilitarianism as sometimes it can be near impossible to predict what will happen. ...read more.

Conclusion

Who would you pick out of the two people? This would prove a problem for a utilitarian because they have to consider how many people would be made happy by saving either their mum or the scientist. If they were to save the scientist then millions of people could be cured of cancer and this is generally what a utilitarian would choose but then you have let your own mother die. You have a special responsibility to your mum as she is your family and she brought you up and you both love each other. So this is a dilemma that some utilitarians may have to face. John Stuart Mill improved Bentham's utilitarian theory. He believed that there were different levels of pleasures that humans enjoy and pushed the emphasis from the quantity of pleasure to the quality. The higher pleasures of the mind are preferred to the lower pleasures of the body. As Mill states; 'It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    Pleasure is notoriously difficult to measure, while people can always express their preferences, including those which may not cause them pleasure but are still important to them. It was devised by Jeremy Bentham and put forward in his book The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789).

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    Ayer is an example of a philosopher who has been led to Emotivism by the epistemological arguments for Moral Scepticism because of his Principle of verification, he is moved to adopt the No-Truth-Value thesis and hence Moral Scepticism. Emotivism then is Ayer's way of explaining the phenomena of moral language.

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Furthermore, Nike may get easy access to those potential markets, such as China, India and so on, as they can sell the products in the place where they are produces with reduced distribution cost. For the countries that Nike are operating in, they get foreign investments, and more job opportunities.

  2. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point ...

    putting it into context of what is socially acceptable in the society in which they live. Relativism is widely supported on the basis that it tolerates other cultures and their different beliefs and behaviours, for after all, how can we judge their morality against our own, when if they did

  1. Utilitarianism (Weaknesses and strengths)

    those affected by an action, that action is right if it brings pleasure (or prevents pain), and wrong if it brings pain (or prevents pleasure.) To assess the quantity of pain and pleasure Bentham introduced the hedonic calculus. He proposed an idea that human pleasures and pains are measurable, and

  2. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    The certainty is almost guaranteed, he will be able to buy drink with the money. However the pleasure of the drunk will be tinged with pain because of the guilt he may experience in doing something dishonest and a possible hangover in the morning.

  1. What are the main features of Utilitarianism as an ethical theory? Examine and consider ...

    Bentham stuck to the policy, that in every circumstance, the right course of action can be determined by what outcome would provide the greatest pleasure for the most people, for example, the building of a hospital would benefit a community much more than the building of an art gallery.

  2. 'Explain how Act and Rule Utilitarianism differ.'

    Then by making this decision n a certain way, you are expecting others to act in that way in the future. Utilitarianism differs to this is the sense that you should always do the thing that will maximise the greatest happiness for the greatest number, rather than do something because you think that that is what someone else would do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work