• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Verification Principle

Extracts from this document...


The Verification Principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss. (45) I would like to start this essay by explaining the background to Logical Positivism and the Verification Principle. The Verification Principle is a philosophical doctrine fundamental to Logical Positivism. Logical Positivists argue that a statement is meaningful only if it is either empirically verifiable or else tautological (You can get to its truth by the meanings of its terms). They believe that if you can give evidence to back up what you said then that evidence was what your statement was all about, e.g. "There is a cat outside the door". The Logical Positivists would say that you can prove this by looking outside the door and you will see the cat. It does appear to offer a real challenge to religious belief since they believe that the only way a statement can be meaningful is either that the meaning of the words prove this or they can be proved by some form of sense experience. ...read more.


However, clearly, it is not always possible to check the evidence for a statement. Therefore, the Logical Positivists argued that for a statement to be meaningful, it was enough to be able to say what sort of evidence could count for or against it. This is the 'weak' form of the Verification Principle. The main challenge to religious language was made by the philosopher, A. J. Ayer who was a Logical Positivist. He argued that the statement 'God exists' cannot be either true or false because there is no empirical evidence that can prove or disprove the statement. Therefore, he argued that it was a meaningless declaration. I would argue that the Verification Principle doesn't really offer a challenge to religious belief. One of the main reasons for this is the fact that some statements which we know are true cannot be proven through the words used. The principle appears to make all historical statements meaningless since they are neither analytic nor synthetic. ...read more.


It does seem logical since it does seem impossible to prove whether or not e.g. God exists. All the Logical Positivists have done is provided a theory as to why this is the case. It could cause a challenge to religious belief since often statements cannot be verified at the present time for example statements about life and death can only be verified if there is an afterlife. The Verification principle only questions a statement's meaningfulness. It doesn't actually make any claim about its actual truth. For example, "My dog is a Labrador" is meaningful because it can be verified but that doesn't mean that it's true. Finally, it seems not to cause a great challenge to religious belief for the main fact that statements about the verification principle itself cannot be verified (or falsified)! There are reasons here which challenge the principle and which make the principle appear logical. Therefore it is difficult to come to a firm decision about whether or not the Verification Principle offers a real challenge to religious belief. Emma Ward 08/05/2007 Emma Ward 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Religion in the Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Religion in the Media essays

  1. The falsification principle offers no real challenge to religious beliefs

    universe, and whether the things he says as a believer are true. R.B. Braithwaite pushed these kinds of thoughts clearly in the non-cognitivist direction. He argued that although religious statements are not cognitive assertions, they however can be non-cognitively meaningful because of their practical value.

  2. Discuss the merits of theories of secularisation with regard to religion in modern Britain

    this with a reading from Thompson in which he neatly summarises the secularisation debate... Berger argues that the evidence for secularisation is inconclusive because religion has changed in form. In modern societies religion has become pluralistic (involving a number of different, competing, religious organisations)

  1. "Assess the view that religious language is meaningless."

    the believer - he is willing to continue his belief despite the fact that there is no real evidence for it. The implication here for religion is that even in the face of almost undeniable evidence the believer still continues to believe, and many would deem that nothing more than blind unconsidered loyalty - not a very respectable philosophical position.

  2. Are Near Death Experience's a valid form of Religious Experience

    One can have wonder at the beauty of linguistics and sculptor. These experiences are called Peak Experiences, for they heighten mood. The central problem is how to interpret these experiences of which there is such a huge variety. Human experience is open to interpretation in either a Theistic or an atheistic manner.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work