• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Violence is an inappropriate response to racism." Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Violence is an inappropriate response to racism." Do you agree? I believe that racism cannot be solved by violence. I think a lot of people would agree with me. People like Martin Luther King, who was probably the best person in history at using non- violent tactics to defeat racism, not giving in, even when his own home was bombed. Some reasons why non-violence is a much more effective weapon than violence against racism, is that violence won't help you, it won't get you anywhere, except maybe prison. It's a waste of time, it won't help the situation at all, it will just cause more hate, so why bother? It's stupid to think it will work. Also, violence will get you in a lot of trouble, it will lose all your sympathy from people because you will look like the bad one, not the innocent and then you won't get much support from anyone Racist people can be very violent, so if you try and fight violence with violence you will be acting just like the racist, the very person you don't want to act like. ...read more.

Middle

If you act violently towards somebody who's racist you will be playing right into their hands and they will have you right where they want you, but if you stay peaceful they will be angry, because they think they aren't getting to you. They want you to react to their racism, but if you stay calm it will make them really angry because they want to hurt you but they think they aren't hurting you, it's not working, so they might give in. In the same way if some makes fun of you and you ignore them they get bored and stop it. Some people do agree with using violence against racism. In fact quite a lot of people do, including Christians. I don't agree with it myself, and I don't think any reason would be good enough to justify violence but I've thought of some reasons that people that are violent to racism might use. They deserve it. I've heard that one so many times, not just to do with racism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The violent person might have had a violent upbringing and background, so violence could be all they are used to, the only method they know to deal with things. Some people just want to teach the racist a lesson, they can't help it. It is human instinct, isnt it? By using violence people feel as if they are in control, it makes them feel stronger, it's like an addiction, once they have the power, once they are in control, they want more, and they get more and more vicious. In world war two, Hitler was destroying Jews because he hated them so much. He thought everyone should have blonde hair and blue eyes and everyone else should be killed, so that one-day we would have a 'pure' race. England had a war with the Germans, obviously using violence - and we won. We stopped all the Jews dying. So evidently in some cases violence can be justified especially in extreme incidents such as the holocaust in world war two, but I think violence shouldn't be used unless absolutely necessary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Fist stick knife gun, Geoffrey Canada (1995) - Violence and Youth in America

    Whitaker (2000) likewise notes the crack epidemic and the new drug laws as combining to create powerful social inducements to lethal violence among gun-toting urban youth. The following section three discusses the causes of violence through the lenses of current research. The Causes of Violence: Current Research Perspective Tilly (2000)

  2. Domestic violence.

    Another response was that midwives showed a genuine 9699564 Interest in the health and well being of the pregnant women. Other women commented that the midwives did not seem shocked or judgmental. Empathy concern and genuine understanding from midwives were much more important issues than the sex of the interviewer.

  1. Domestic violence is a complex issue, which affects the whole of society.

    this is because the government is to keen on promoting the idea of the nuclear family consisting of a mother, father and children. This can make it very difficult for women and children as the act assumes that when a separation occurs the children will benefit from having contact with the absent parent.

  2. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    Parenting Programmes A huge diversity of parenting programmes are available throughout the world, most programmes within Aotearoa New Zealand operate from a parenting skills development base rather than addressing parenting issues (Dalziel). Parenting programmes do not fit neatly into a primary, secondary or tertiary prevention model as they vary considerably

  1. Domestic violence

    African women appear to be the most tolerant of abusive behaviour with only 55% viewing rape as domestic violence (Mooney (2000a) p156), in terms of class differences, it appears that professional women are more likely to see mental cruelty, threats and violence as domestic violence than middle and working class women (Mooney (2000a)

  2. Gandhi did not claim to be a prophet or even a philosopher. "There is ...

    This did not, however, mean that Gandhi did not distinguish between the countries which inflicted and the countries which suffered violence. His own life had been one struggle against the forces of violence, and Satyagraha was designed at once to eschew violence and to fight injustice.

  1. How far do you agree with the claim that the Duke of Northumberland’s unscrupulous ...

    He would also risk the wrath of Mary - she was known to be a very devout Catholic and would not necessarily let Northumberland live in peace. Northumberland took steps to try and ensure that he would remain in power when Edward died, by having his niece Lady Jane Grey become Monarch after Edward.

  2. Non-violence is an effective answer to prejudice. Do you agree?

    However, in very special cases such as WWII war and fighting may be unavoidable. For example, I agree with the decisions that Winston Churchill made and believe that there were no other options to stop Hitler and the Nazis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work