• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is passionate conviction ever sufficient for justifying knowledge. The main aim of this essay is to discuss the differences between the more personalized phrase

Extracts from this document...


What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is passionate conviction ever sufficient for justifying knowledge. The main aim of this essay is to discuss the differences between the more personalized phrase, "I am certain" with the more generalized term, "it is certain". After this I will discuss whether the passionate conviction of an individual is enough to justify knowledge without the use of logical reasoning. However, passionate conviction even though it may be perceived by one person, it may not be proven false. Empiricism can be defined as 'the practice of medicine that disregards scientific theory and relies solely on practical experience'. In contrast, rationalism is defined as 'reliance on reason as the best guide for belief and action'. Knowledge is defined as the 'psychological result of perception and learning and reasoning'. In the above context, we first need to define what we mean by "certain". The first 'certain' means I am convinced. The second 'certain' means it is indisputable. "Certainty is the acceptance of fact without doubt. When should one be certain? When all knowledge supports the conclusion, and no one denies it. If one has a valid reason for doubting something, one should not be certain. ...read more.


In these cases, 'I am certain' is a better way of expressing knowledge (it will be less convincing if someone says, "It is certain that I love you," since science cannot tell why you are in love, but only what happens after you are in love). Moreover, personal belief is less likely to change because one's belief is constantly refreshed by his/her emotions and memories." Furthermore I am certain that my name is Nishane, I am of a Sri Lankan origin and that I was born on the 8th of December 1988. I know all that all of this is true because it was passed down from my parents and my birth certificate states all of this in writing. But can I be really certain that all of this information is true? Whether it is true or not, I can never really know for sure and only have my parents words for it. I could have been picked up in a ditch or adopted from an orphanage in Sri Lanka. As 'I am certain' can be defined as subjective certainty 'it is certain' can be classified as objective certainty, according to S�ren Kierkegaard's theory. I am certain that killing somebody are wrong. I have come to this conclusion due to my upbringing because of my parents influence of me and if I did commit this it would clash with my morals and also my religion which considers killing someone as a sin. ...read more.


Joan of Arc was burnt as a witch for taking up arms against the English. The priests convinced each other that an ordinary mortal woman could not lead an army. In finding the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain," it is evident that the passive and the personal assertions of certainty are not the same and cannot be applied to the same issues in all cases. "It is certain" is usually attained first through "I am certain," because for all men to believe something, one man must have believed it. The transition is not flawless, however, because where matters are not accepted by all, two conflicting statements of "I am certain" cannot both be correct. Ethics and religion, subjective and often contradictory matters, are a perfect example of this. Passionate conviction is rarely sufficient, and never necessary for justifying knowledge. Only through emotion can zeal for a cause justify truth, and even then only a part of the time. Passionate conviction, by eliminating all other doubts, may turn an "I am certain" into an "it is certain." Each claim has a separate axiom that is in each area of knowledge. Passionate conviction connects the personal with the passive assertions of certainty and sometimes justifies this certainty. Through every way certainty is determined, there is only one solid conclusion about it: "I am certain" may be to anyone, but "it is certain" must be to everyone. 1- http://www.amyscott.com/WAYS%20OF%20KNOWING%20LInking.pdf (Goethe) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Revelation Essay

    also brought the very important aspect of his identification with man and all man limitations. Christ suffers for man and brings salvation. God's revelation in the New Testament is centered on Salvation. God saves and brings good news. God chose to express Himself fully and finally by becoming man and walking with us.

  2. Persuasive Writing on the Holocaust

    I think this is bad and a very hard thing to do because many people would just forget the fact that God exist. This makes the Jews feel bad because they had to be killed. I think this is a poor act on Humanity and that many people would agree.

  1. Identify two differences between idealism and representative realism?

    Idealists also like to use the idea that when you are in a normal experience and state your sense data will be perfectly normal, however when you are in a hallucination experience your sense data becomes unpredictable and irregular. An example of this can be related to the words 'my

  2. How Certain Can We Be About Science?

    This means that what I see as the colour blue is not necessarily what another person sees as blue. Furthermore, the human view of the world changes constantly as the human develops so what I see as blue today might be what I see as grey in sixty years time when my optic nerve has deteriorated.

  1. Belief has been described as TOK essay

    In this respect, the calculation made using the theoretical mathematics can never give a high degree of certainty. Let say a group of engineers intend to build a suspension bridge which can bear the mass of 5 tonne. From their calculations, they found out that the bridge should then be built with a piling of 15 metres deep.

  2. Is Perception the Source and Basis of Knowledge?

    This is true for some people. Some people can figure these things out with nothing but reason, but I would believe that there are some others that cannot. Rationalists believe that we are born with detailed concepts of God, causality, and mathematics. There is no way to prove this but it is an interesting theory.

  1. Explain and illustrate the differences between prepositional and non-prepositional revelation.

    This is again is a valid point, though it truth must be decided by personal choice. Literalists are people who believe everything is true whereas non literalists believe the Bible is the true meaning but no literal. However, literalists believe the Bible is true simply because it says it is, this is a circular argument which holds no actual evidence.

  2. 'Knowledge Of Angels' Essay.

    that God already exists.' By this he means that A Priori proofs can be used to show that God must exist, but this does not mean that he does exists. The existence can only be proven by experience, which would make it an A Posteriori proof.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work