• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main features of utilitarianism as anethical theory?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory? (10) Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory. Deontological ethical theories concentrate on moral rules that cannot be broken because the act itself is bad, whereas teleological theories concentrate on the consequence of an action instead. 'For a teleological thinker, the ends justify the means'. Followers of teleological ethical theories decide whether an act is good or bad from the consequences it will produce. Therefore, whereas a deontological thinker would say stealing was wrong, a teleological thinker might say stealing in situations where the consequences bring the greatest good to the greatest number was acceptable. Therefore, for teleological thinkers a way in which to determine the good or bad outcome of an action needed to be devised. This led to the principle of utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham developed the theory of utilirarianism. His theory formed three parts. The first part is what he believed motivated human beings. He was a hedonist in his belief that pleasure was what motivated human beings, them turning away from pain, and that pleasure was the sole good and pain was the sole evil. "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure" Bentham developed the utility principle that stated the rightness ...read more.

Middle

Rule utilitarians would say that jumping traffic on any day was wrong, because the law is in place for the greatest good of the community. This form of utilitarianism is associated with John Stuart Mill and involves sacrificing your personal happiness sometimes to obey laws and rules enforced to create law and order which benefit everybody in the long run. Examine and consider criticisms which have been made against utilitarianism. (10) Act utilitarianism is seen as a way of justifying breaking laws. For example, if murdering a person can be justified because it causes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, then people would go around murdering for the good of mankind. People can only really establish what is better for society on a personal level, their opinion of whether their act of murder is right might not be other people's opinion on whether it is right. Therefore, act utilitarianism is not effectively sound. However, to counteract this argument, rule utilitarianism has been brought about by John Stuart Mill. This states that laws in society should be followed as strictly as possible, so that the greater good for society is achieved and leaves little option for personal perception to corrupt an act of evil or good. ...read more.

Conclusion

In A Theory of Justice by John Rawls, this issue is highlighted and it explains the need to protect minorities. The fourth criticism is that utilitarianism gives no definition on what definitely causes pain or pleasure. One person's pleasure may be the other persons pain, so making decisions for the majority of people is impossible. The premise on which utilitarianism is based is weakened because there is no definite answer on what causes pain or pleasure, so no rule can be made for general purposes. In conclusion, despite its faults, utilitarianism has proved very popular, even by today's standards. People have followed hedonism especially, seeking their own pleasure from their actions.. 'It remains a persuasive ethical theory due its practical dimension, which provides organisations with clear-cut system for making decisions.' Personally I think utilitarianism is a posh name for common sense, and that there is no way people can write law books for ethics in life, but instead people should use the theories as rough guides to decisions. Everyone makes decisions differently, and there can be no handbook to being a good person, it has to come from within. However, I respect John Stuart Mill's theories more than Bentham's original plan, as he explain mind pleasures are more important than bodily pleasures, and this clarified an issue that was severely wrong with basic utilitarianism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    Utilitarianism is a straightforward way of making a decision. It is simple and easy to understand, although it is often difficult to judge what makes people happy. Also, it is important to recognise that pain is not necessarily a bad thing, grief aids the sufferer in the long run, guilt is a lesson of conscience and self sacrifice is commendable.

  2. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    They are responsible for government and decision making. Vaishyas- This is the group which provides the main sources of income for society. They run farms and businesses trading with other nations, and producing wealth for the benefit of the whole community. Shudras- This is the servant group. They work to support members of the other varnas, and do manual jobs.

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    However, one should aim to pursue mainly intellectual pleasures. When given a choice between a pleasure of the body and a pleasure of the mind, one should aim for the pleasure of the mind. Mill also believed that some ideals, such as justice, truth, and love, were good whether or not people desired them or were made happy by them.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    Utilitarianism does not find it morally necessary to uphold the sanctity of life. This creates a dilemma in which it could be ok to sacrifice human life in order to pleasure other humans. This is clearly not practical, so what if I turn to another theory, what about Situation ethics.

  1. "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far ...

    Maintaining the happiness of the little girl is more important, because this unhappiness will spread to her family, the police force (to get the paedophiles), her teachers and her friends. The second point is that even it is morally justified, it still does not mean it should be the way of doing so.

  2. Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features ...

    In his famous argument he simplifies the term "happiness" and "pleasure" used by Bentham, as one major criticism is that the word "pleasure" does not have the same meaning as the word "good". Utilitarianism as an ethical theory possesses a main feature whereby it is concerned with the wants and needs of society.

  1. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    "Ought implies can." We cannot expect people to do things that they cannot do. If a child is drowning, and John cannot swim, then john is not physically capable of saving the child, and there is therefore no sense in our saying that he ought to save the child.

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    Aristotle maintains that we do not have an innate knowledge of the virtues, and as such we are not born as virtuous beings. Therefore we need to practice in order to improve. Similarly this is the case for sports and many other areas in life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work