• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main features of utilitarianism as anethical theory?

Extracts from this document...


What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory? (10) Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory. Deontological ethical theories concentrate on moral rules that cannot be broken because the act itself is bad, whereas teleological theories concentrate on the consequence of an action instead. 'For a teleological thinker, the ends justify the means'. Followers of teleological ethical theories decide whether an act is good or bad from the consequences it will produce. Therefore, whereas a deontological thinker would say stealing was wrong, a teleological thinker might say stealing in situations where the consequences bring the greatest good to the greatest number was acceptable. Therefore, for teleological thinkers a way in which to determine the good or bad outcome of an action needed to be devised. This led to the principle of utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham developed the theory of utilirarianism. His theory formed three parts. The first part is what he believed motivated human beings. He was a hedonist in his belief that pleasure was what motivated human beings, them turning away from pain, and that pleasure was the sole good and pain was the sole evil. "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure" Bentham developed the utility principle that stated the rightness ...read more.


Rule utilitarians would say that jumping traffic on any day was wrong, because the law is in place for the greatest good of the community. This form of utilitarianism is associated with John Stuart Mill and involves sacrificing your personal happiness sometimes to obey laws and rules enforced to create law and order which benefit everybody in the long run. Examine and consider criticisms which have been made against utilitarianism. (10) Act utilitarianism is seen as a way of justifying breaking laws. For example, if murdering a person can be justified because it causes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people, then people would go around murdering for the good of mankind. People can only really establish what is better for society on a personal level, their opinion of whether their act of murder is right might not be other people's opinion on whether it is right. Therefore, act utilitarianism is not effectively sound. However, to counteract this argument, rule utilitarianism has been brought about by John Stuart Mill. This states that laws in society should be followed as strictly as possible, so that the greater good for society is achieved and leaves little option for personal perception to corrupt an act of evil or good. ...read more.


In A Theory of Justice by John Rawls, this issue is highlighted and it explains the need to protect minorities. The fourth criticism is that utilitarianism gives no definition on what definitely causes pain or pleasure. One person's pleasure may be the other persons pain, so making decisions for the majority of people is impossible. The premise on which utilitarianism is based is weakened because there is no definite answer on what causes pain or pleasure, so no rule can be made for general purposes. In conclusion, despite its faults, utilitarianism has proved very popular, even by today's standards. People have followed hedonism especially, seeking their own pleasure from their actions.. 'It remains a persuasive ethical theory due its practical dimension, which provides organisations with clear-cut system for making decisions.' Personally I think utilitarianism is a posh name for common sense, and that there is no way people can write law books for ethics in life, but instead people should use the theories as rough guides to decisions. Everyone makes decisions differently, and there can be no handbook to being a good person, it has to come from within. However, I respect John Stuart Mill's theories more than Bentham's original plan, as he explain mind pleasures are more important than bodily pleasures, and this clarified an issue that was severely wrong with basic utilitarianism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

    He also believed in consequentialism. This meant judging rightness and wrongness of actions depended on our evaluation of the consequences. Therefore good and bad can only be judged after the event has taken place. This meant intention did not matter, only the result of the action did.

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    As we cannot logically say that the future will conform to past observation then we cannot logically suggest that no human will ever perform an altruistic act.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    The second is antinomianism, when people ignore or go against the law or rules. This theory lies in-between the two, this is known as Situationism. Each situation should be dealt with individually, you should remember the rules but be prepared to put them aside, and it allows people to think for themselves.

  2. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    seen a couple who had true love and have not been married for 6 years. Most traditional Hindus teach that marriage is an important duty for men and women; choosing to stay single is not encouraged. A marriage does not just join together a man and a woman, but two extended families.

  1. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    John Stuart Mill puts greater stress on the variety of pleasures and distinguishes between their respective values. He maintains that some pleasures, namely those on the mind, are higher and more estimable than others, namely those of the mind.

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    To weigh up whether an action is morally right or morally wrong, Bentham formulated the hedonic calculus. The hedonic calculus weighs up the pain and pleasure of an action using seven principles: intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity or remoteness, fecundity, purity, and extent.

  1. Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism.

    In conclusion, I believe that despite the weaknesses, Utilitarianism has proved a useful ethical theory since its original formation, with updated versions by Sidgwick and Singer, and remains a persuasive ethical theory in which it provides a practical dimension with the ability to take into account individual situations. (552 words)

  2. 'Explain how Act and Rule Utilitarianism differ.'

    Then by making this decision n a certain way, you are expecting others to act in that way in the future. Utilitarianism differs to this is the sense that you should always do the thing that will maximise the greatest happiness for the greatest number, rather than do something because you think that that is what someone else would do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work