• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main strengths and weaknesses of teleological argument for the existence of god?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the main strengths and weaknesses of teleological argument for the existence of god? A teleological argument is an argument for the existence of god based on evidence of design in nature. Design in the universe, the existence of god. The teleological argument is considered to have certain basic notions of god that can be understood from the created order without needing references to any special revelation i.e., the bible, or messiahs. The Teleological Argument was described by Immanuel Kant as the 'oldest, clearest and most reasonable argument for the existence of God though he himself admitted to finding it personally unconvincing. Part of the argument's strength lies in its straightforwardness, it is a very simple argument to understand. One can relate to the argument as humans are considered to be designers themselves by nature, for example the watch analogy brought by Paley, so it is understandable for humans to think of things as having a purpose. The argument uses of analogy. Whether this is using a watch, an eye, or an acorn using concrete images to explain ideas and theories to help with the understanding of the argument by using in a context that can be easily understood. If the argument is easily understood, it is understandable that it will become a more convincing line of argument. Aquinas backs up the teleological argument. ...read more.

Middle

A major problem with the design argument is the fact that whilst some of the universe may seem well designed there is much that could be considered bad design, natural disasters for example. This creates a whole host of problems with the main thrust being that with all of the features of bad design that we find, any designer or 'blind watchmaker' as Richard Dawkins put it, would possibly have to be either not wholly good or not wholly powerful. Mill chose to maintain God's goodness, thus accepting that God was limited in some way, although Mill said he could not tell by what or by whom. If one of the aforementioned flaws in the designer is not the case then it is difficult to argue a case for the existence of a designer of a world, which exhibits so many elements of 'bad design'. David Hume put forward the thought that if it could be proved that there is design in our world, who is to say whether the Designer is not in fact referring to more than one designer, in other words designers. Hume also suggested that the designer(s) could be stupid or even downright evil, whatever the case may be it is hard to think of any of these properties could be proven. He also asked whether the order we see is imposed upon the chaos in which we live by humans, who insist upon finding a pattern and a meaning where non may exist. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even if a pattern should eventually emerge in the future it does not necessarily mean it would bolster the strength of the design argument for any pattern could simply be nature's way of surviving. Perhaps those who fit this pattern survive, whilst the rest perish. It could even be that human race is the survivor of a million failed worlds. One may also question the use of analogy, which can be found in many forms of the Design Argument. It is quite right to say that we are not comparing like with like and so one could conclude that the use of analogy fails as a result. In conclusion I personally believe that the introduction of modern scientific theories, through the years have managed to disprove many people's beliefs that the universe has been designed. The introduction of these theories has planted an element of doubt into people's minds (those who believe in the teleological theory). The new theories provide a much more logical explanation of the creation of the universe. To be fair, however, all the theories brought by previous philosophers such as Paley and Aquinas their theories may have produced answer for their present situation. However, for our discoveries and situations that we are faced in, the scientific theories that are presented to us seem more logical. Who knows whether the current scientific theories will last, considering there is are new discoveries all over the world, which calls for new theories to be made. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim

    Therefore when many Philopshers link arguments, that happened many years ago, it does not gain favour with everyone due to the expansive time difference and lack of verification.

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    This is therefore evidence for the existence of God. It cannot be a result of natural selection, as everyone has the ability to appreciate or dislike their surroundings equally. Things being beautiful or ugly within our surroundings are not necessary for survival, so there must have been a designer to implant these characteristics into humans.

  1. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    Other evidence includes Newton's laws of nature to explain regularity in the universe and he argues that this regularity could not occur without a designer imposing it. Paley's teleological approach comprises of two arguments, the first being design qua purpose and the second design qua regularity.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    To Kant, it seemed impossible that we could require an aim for an impossible goal. This deadlock led Kant to postulate the existence of God and immorality. As we are unable to achieve the goal in this lifetime there must be someone else to ensure that we can in a future life.

  1. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    So, unless the person claiming to have 'seen God' was drunk or mentally ill, we should trust them. If they are of sound mind and reasonable intelligence, we should give them some credibility; otherwise we will 'land in a sceptical bog'.

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    The word 'describing' itself means, by definition that the issue is a logical one and that by trying to describe that issue we are trying to gain a full understanding of the metaphysical idea. Hume developed his Copy Principle in order that he try to describe the problems that arrive in describing God.

  1. David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of ...

    18-01-2001. R.S. Mr Mort. Viki Nixon DFW13 Philosophers of the argument from design include: St. Thomas Aquinas: gave this as the fifth of his 'Five Ways'. He believed that the universe required an intelligent being to bring this about, i.e. God. David Hume: believed that the universe was like a machine, subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines.

  2. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    However, if I see a watch lying on the ground I cannot reasonably account for it in a similar way. A watch consists of a complex arrangement of wheels, cogs, axles, springs, and balances, all operating accurately together to provide a regular measurement of the lapse of time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work