• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the strengths of the design argument? Comment on some of the criticisms raised against this argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Design Argument What are the strengths of the design argument? Comment on some of the criticisms raised against this argument. The design argument has been argued by many philosophers over hundreds of years. The design argument suggests that the world displays elements of design, with things being adapted towards some overall end or purpose and such design suggests that the world is the work of a designer - God. Two of the main philosophers to argue this point were Aquinas and Paley but many others since have tried to back these up with there own approaches for example Swinburne with the argument from probability. With all arguments there have been criticisms raised against it with Hume being the main one but others include the Epicurean Hypothesis, Darwin and Dawkins. The main strengths are that it is a solid argument, based on experience that people can relate to, there being a huge chance that things were designed is a probable outcome, its logical, it makes sense and it is believable. ...read more.

Middle

But then people have argued that suffering is there for a reason and its part of 'the test'. Next he argued that God is too different to us and transcends human understanding and by using the design argument you lesson God as we are finite and God in infinite. This was a fair point as it's hard for a finite being to grasp infinity, but we are rational beings and should try to grasp ungraspable. Lastly he says that it is not a good analogy as the universe is more like an animal or vegetable than a machine, because it grows of its own accord. A cabbage may be a better analogy, but machines grow too and plants themselves are like machines. The Epicurean Hypothesis is another criticism of the design argument. The first premise of this syllogism states that at the time of creation, the universe was made up of particles in random motion. This was a state of chaos. ...read more.

Conclusion

He argued that natural selection gives the appearance of design, which leads to a mistaken belief in a designer. He wrote a book called 'The Blind Watchmaker' which argued that variations in the world are caused by random mistakes in DNA. He also produced a computer model which showed how intelligent life could evolve naturally. The problem with his argument is that someone had to write the programme and set the parameters which suggest a designer and experience shows that we can breed features into species by selecting the ones with the desired characteristics and then breeding them over a few generations. It has also been argued that we choose our mate on a genetic basis, which could mean programming. I conclude that the design argument does not prove the God of Classical Theism but then again the criticisms do not disprove it. If both sides of the argument are examined then it is really down to the person whether they believe that the universe was created by a designer and that designer being God as there are strong points made for and against the argument and neither can be logically false. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    As people's opinions started to change, and more ideas became common, more critics began to write their ideas. One of the most vital, important, and influential critics was Charles Darwin. He was an English naturalist who wrote a book called "On the origin of species by means of natural selection" (1859)

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    "A common sense interpretation dictates that a super intellect has monkeyed around with physics. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." (CD 7, track 2) An atheistic counter example is to assume that an infinite number of universes were created instead of just our own.

  1. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    Darwin offered a mechanical explanation for the development of life on Earth in which natural selection took place. He argues that random variations which gave the best advantage to a plant or animal in the struggle for survival resulted in the survival of the fittest member of that species.

  2. David Hume is the main opponent of the design argument. Provide a summary of ...

    then why is there evil in the world? Why did/does Got not change the world to be a better place for everyone? This argument then leads to thinking God is either: 18-01-2001. R.S. Mr Mort. Viki Nixon DFW13 - not all good, because he has chosen to have evil in the world, or - not all powerful, because

  1. An explanation and evaluation of the different perspectives on religion offered by Richard Dawkins ...

    His arguments, although not irrefutable, are at least based upon logical progressions through the fatal flaws in Dawkins' arguments. Around the last two chapters, his arguments change. More and more biblical quotations find their way in, until by the last few pages, it's less like reading a rebuttal and more like reading God's selected works.

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    It could be a disadvantage as to experience something or to observe it we need to use our senses. So how do we know that our senses are not showing us something wrong? We may see what our mind wants us to see therefore making the argument a weakness.

  1. "The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim

    We are not aware of any variation to what we see now. We only know this world and what is around us and what we have seen, we have only seen all of this once so there is no evidence to claim it has been designed because we have only seen everything once.

  2. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    Irenaeus' answer to the question why evil is necessary and why God didn't simply create humans perfectly to begin with is that he believed that attaining the likeness of God requires the "willing cooperation of human individuals." Willing cooperation requires genuine freedom; we cannot willingly cooperate with something if we are being forced into it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work