• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does it mean to say that God is 'necessary?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What does it mean to say that God is 'necessary?' Many philosophers and theologians have provided varying ideas about how to prove the existence of God, the ontological and Cosmological arguments are two different arguments which attempt to prove that god is necesary. The ontological argument, is one of the argument that attempts to prove that God is necessary, The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm's "Proslogion" which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the Proslogion is not to directly prove the existence of God but to moreover, to show the relationship between faith and reason. The Ontological Argument is a 'priori argument' this means that the conculsion comes not from the use of reason or proof but if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. This means that if I know what the definition of something is, I do not then need a test to determine the truth or falsity of a statement. For example, I understand what a triangle is, it has three angles that add up to 180 degrees. I do not need any evidence to prove the truth in the statement a triangle has three angles. Anselm defined God as: 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived.' ...read more.

Middle

Consequently, according to Anselm, He must be necessary.If something than which nothing greater can be thought of could be thought of as not existing, then something than which nothing greater can be thought of would not be something than which nothing greater can be thought of, which is an outright contradiction and thus absurd. Something than which nothing greater can be thought of has such a high degree of existence, that is, necessary existence, that it cannot be thought of as not existing, that is, its nonexistence is impossible. Descartes moderated the ontological argument and said that "a supremely perfect being" must exist as existence is a defining predicate. He attempts to prove this concept by trying to portray it by using an example of a triangle. He says that "existence can no more be separated from the essence of God than the fact that its three angles equal two right angles can be separated from the essence of the triangle". Descartes is basically saying that by definition, a triangle must have three angles and in the same way, he is saying that that 'existence' must be a predicate that is included in the defining qualities that God holds. Descartes tried to prove the necessary existence of God through this argument: 1.If there is a God it is a perfect being; 2. A perfect being possesses all possible perfections; 3. ...read more.

Conclusion

An essential property of a necessary being is eternality. If then it could be made plausible that the universe began to exist and is not therefore eternal, one would to that extent at least have shown the superiority of theism as a rational world view. This higher being is thought to be God, and therefore God is necessary in order to cause the universe. Rene Descartes asked what happens if everything is doubted - even one's own existence. He thought that the "I" of which each one of us is aware when we think is the one thing of which we can be certain. Hence his famous dictum, "I think, therefore I am." He went on to wonder "...from whom could I ... derive my existence" if there is no God? If I exist then my existence "... requires the same power and act that would be necessary to create it ..." Just as we think and therefore exist, so there must be an ultimate Thinker from whom all existence derives. This "thinking being" is the ultimate cause of all other beings and must therefore possess "the idea and all the perfections I attribute to deity." The cosmological argument and ontological argument prove God's existence is 'necessary' through many different methods. If a person accepts that God is the ultimate creator and that there can be no one greater it is safe to assume that God is necessary, and the ontological and cosmological arguments set out a logical way of achieving this! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Does God Exist?

    This same argument can also be applied to God, he exists in the mind, as we all have a definition of Him and it is not logically impossible that He exists in reality. However things that exist in reality are greater than those that exist in the mind, 'Greater than

  2. Arguments about god.

    God was angry, but the clothes were symbols of his love for us. Nowadays, we recognize love as a feeling of affection towards someone. Whether they're a friend, relation, lover or even an animal. Behind love there is an entity telling us that love is good and we feel warm inside when we're around people we love.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    In order for this change to take place actuality is required. If not the object would have to initiate change itself, which is a logical impossibility. This is an impossibility because it would mean that the wood would be both potential and actual at the same time, how can wood make itself hot if it is hot already?

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    However, Gaunilo, a contemporary of Anselm and a fellow Catholic, argued that Anselm's ontological argument is invalid, because an argument of the same form could have true premises and a false conclusion therefore, he introduced perfect island argument which is perfectly parallel to ontological argument.one must imagine what characteristics would constitute `the greatest conceivable island.'

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    I find it impossible to give up the principle; and with that confession of the intellectual impotence of old age I must leave this topic.4 Motivated by concerns such as Broad's, some of the few nontheists who have been vocal on this subject have gone so far as to deny, without due justification, central tenets of big bang cosmology.

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Russell argues that people are confusing first and second order predicates; so while the cow has first order predicates such as hoofs and ears (material properties), the unicorn only has second order predicates ( conceptual properties). So, he argued that God can only be thought of in terms of second order predicates.

  1. What do Christians mean when they say that ''Man is estranged from God'' ? ...

    This relationship was destroyed by the Fall. All these things started happening after man disobeyed God. Man had been put in charge of nature by God, after the Fall nature didn't harmonize with man, it was hard to work, God said '' cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it...

  2. To what extent the Hare Krishna movement can be described as a cult

    There are four regulative principles which devotees adopt to assist them to develop those qualities and also to help control the insatiable urges of the mind and senses. These principles are: 1. No eating of meat, fish or eggs. 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work