• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does it mean to say that God is 'necessary?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What does it mean to say that God is 'necessary?' Many philosophers and theologians have provided varying ideas about how to prove the existence of God, the ontological and Cosmological arguments are two different arguments which attempt to prove that god is necesary. The ontological argument, is one of the argument that attempts to prove that God is necessary, The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm's "Proslogion" which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the Proslogion is not to directly prove the existence of God but to moreover, to show the relationship between faith and reason. The Ontological Argument is a 'priori argument' this means that the conculsion comes not from the use of reason or proof but if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. This means that if I know what the definition of something is, I do not then need a test to determine the truth or falsity of a statement. For example, I understand what a triangle is, it has three angles that add up to 180 degrees. I do not need any evidence to prove the truth in the statement a triangle has three angles. Anselm defined God as: 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived.' ...read more.

Middle

Consequently, according to Anselm, He must be necessary.If something than which nothing greater can be thought of could be thought of as not existing, then something than which nothing greater can be thought of would not be something than which nothing greater can be thought of, which is an outright contradiction and thus absurd. Something than which nothing greater can be thought of has such a high degree of existence, that is, necessary existence, that it cannot be thought of as not existing, that is, its nonexistence is impossible. Descartes moderated the ontological argument and said that "a supremely perfect being" must exist as existence is a defining predicate. He attempts to prove this concept by trying to portray it by using an example of a triangle. He says that "existence can no more be separated from the essence of God than the fact that its three angles equal two right angles can be separated from the essence of the triangle". Descartes is basically saying that by definition, a triangle must have three angles and in the same way, he is saying that that 'existence' must be a predicate that is included in the defining qualities that God holds. Descartes tried to prove the necessary existence of God through this argument: 1.If there is a God it is a perfect being; 2. A perfect being possesses all possible perfections; 3. ...read more.

Conclusion

An essential property of a necessary being is eternality. If then it could be made plausible that the universe began to exist and is not therefore eternal, one would to that extent at least have shown the superiority of theism as a rational world view. This higher being is thought to be God, and therefore God is necessary in order to cause the universe. Rene Descartes asked what happens if everything is doubted - even one's own existence. He thought that the "I" of which each one of us is aware when we think is the one thing of which we can be certain. Hence his famous dictum, "I think, therefore I am." He went on to wonder "...from whom could I ... derive my existence" if there is no God? If I exist then my existence "... requires the same power and act that would be necessary to create it ..." Just as we think and therefore exist, so there must be an ultimate Thinker from whom all existence derives. This "thinking being" is the ultimate cause of all other beings and must therefore possess "the idea and all the perfections I attribute to deity." The cosmological argument and ontological argument prove God's existence is 'necessary' through many different methods. If a person accepts that God is the ultimate creator and that there can be no one greater it is safe to assume that God is necessary, and the ontological and cosmological arguments set out a logical way of achieving this! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Therefore there must have been a necessary being who brought everything into existence, which was God. If God didn't exist then nothing would exist. William Lee Craig developed a modern formation of the Kalam argument, a branch of the cosmological argument.

  2. Does God Exist?

    This same argument can also be applied to God, he exists in the mind, as we all have a definition of Him and it is not logically impossible that He exists in reality. However things that exist in reality are greater than those that exist in the mind, 'Greater than

  1. Is God timeless or eternal? The cosmological argument.

    The first puts forward the idea that all objects in the world move and there therefore must have been a prime mover, someone to make the first movement which sets off the chain reaction in the same way that the first in a line of dominos is knocked over to cause the rest to fall.

  2. If facts by themselves never prove or disprove anything, what else is involved in ...

    Sometimes facts are hard to question. It is not easy to understand that something you have believed all your life is actually false. So sometimes we tend to accept facts that we are told without questioning them. For example, when in the early 20th century coloured people began to ask for equal rights as whites, it was seen as unacceptable.

  1. Arguments about god.

    Consequently he banished us from the Garden of Eden. We ask these questions because we are a certain people, we don't like mysteries, they have to be solved. Some people spend their whole lives trying to figure out the world's secrets and then it even passes on to their offspring.

  2. What do Christians mean when they say that ''Man is estranged from God'' ? ...

    Before the fall man and women had a perfect relationship. They were naked together, the Genesis 2 says: '' The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame'' Gen.

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    concerns can be set out in the following way: The assumption that God exists For if God cannot be thought not to exist, then what is the point of launching this whole argument against someone who might deny that something of such a nature actually exists?

  2. Does God exist?

    My answer would be simply, "It works." At least in some circumstances. In others, I guess one could say I believe in calculus or quantum mechanics. Such things are merely concepts that model observational evidence. The second way people justify God is the Bible, a book that somehow manages to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work