• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Does It Mean When Christians Talk About Jesus As The Son of God.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction When Jesus rose from the dead the disciples realized that they needed new ways of describing him to reflect his amazing power and holiness. They scoured the Hebrew and Jewish scriptures looking for something appropriate to call him by and came up with titles such as "Messiah", "Son of Man", "Son of David" and "Son of God". In the end Son of God became the most popular of these titles so that is what he became best known as. It is therefore the subject of my coursework. What Does It Mean When Christians Talk About Jesus As Son of God In the Old Testament, the words "Son of God" often meant someone who had a special relationship with God. However, Mark was also much influenced by the prophet Daniel, who spoke of the coming of the "Son of Man with the authority of God." Mark uses the title in the very first sentence of his gospel. "The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God" He only uses these words two other times in the whole of the gospel (3:11 and 15:39). ...read more.


If they believe Jesus is God they will pray to him as God and worship him as God. Fundamentalists believe that Jesus' teaching is always right and non-negotiable because Jesus' word is God's word and God is never wrong. On divorce for instance Jesus says: "No human being must separate what God has joined together" (Mark 10:9) The vast majority of people nowadays believe that divorce is acceptable if the couple are unhappy. Fundamentalists, however, believe that divorce is never acceptable under any circumstances because Jesus said so and he is always right. Liberals believe that Jesus is the Son of God by adoption and not God's actual biological son, though they do see him as special. They pray only to God though they do pray to God through Jesus. However, they never pray to Jesus as God. Liberals believe Jesus was just a first century human being so his word and his teachings don't carry the same eternal truth as God's word carries. His teaching can in some areas be seen as irrelevant in today's society because he didn't know how society would have progressed 2000 years from his time. ...read more.


. They believe it creates disunity in the Church which is not good and is seen as a weakness in the religion. Those who argue that the ambiguity is not a problem defend the standpoint that it is an open issue and people should be allowed their own views. Faith is not an exact truth and debate can help people cement their beliefs. I would say that it is important to retain the title because this alone does not deter people from becoming Christians. Christians usually want to join the Church because of what they believe in, not because the faith is undecided on one issue. If the title were scrapped, this would mean changing something that has been in existence for around 2000 years and has been so central to Christianity for so long. Changing a historical religion now is far more likely to put people off than disagreement over what a title means. Therefore, I think there is absolutely no case for dropping it. Dispensing with the title of Son of God would cause more trouble than it saved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What does it mean to say that God is 'necessary?'

    Therefore, to say that God can be thought not to exist if the definition of God is "that than which none greater can be conceived" contradicts the previous statement and this indicates that God necessarily exists. Anslem suggested that God must be a necessary being (He must exist).

  2. Living In a Plural Society.

    Yet no matter what stage of life one is in, "renouncing the fruits of your labors" is the supreme law of morality. Hindus seek to remain conscious of the illusory nature of this world and so progressively deny themselves, at least in thought, all forms of material, emotional, and even spiritual rewards and property.

  1. In Christianity, there are three main factions: Fundamentalists, Liberals and Conservatives. Each believes ...

    Therefore they do not believe that the Bible is an accurate teaching of science, but a book of faith and knowledge of God. This way, there is no difficulty in accepting more recent ideas such as Evolution (God could have named the apes from which we evolved Adam and Eve in the Bible)

  2. R.E. Medical issues

    life, and that it is difficult to know where to draw the line regarding which medical techniques are classed as 'playing god' and which are merely improving human life. If genetic engineering is stopped for moral implications, then the same could be done with all medical techniques, which could have disastrous effects.

  1. What did Jesus mean by the Kingdom or rule of God?

    Luke 14:15-24 'The Parable of the Great Banquet' shows that the Kingdom has this future aspect very clearly. What did Jesus mean? What would the Kingdom be like? Through the parables, Jesus challenged the listener to understand what the Kingdom would be like.

  2. Arguments about god.

    * One more experience could be of actually seeing the God, and sensing his presence. This could happen in a near death experience, or from a flat liner brought back by the hospital staff. It could also happen through dreams or trances, these are called 'mystical experiences' These experiences are

  1. What do Christians mean when they say that ''Man is estranged from God'' ? ...

    To start with, the relationships on earth were perfect. Man and nature had a perfect relationship, man didn't have to work hard to cultivate the land and there was no pain in childbirth. Natural disasters didn't exist and man didn't pollute, destroy, or misuse the earth in any way.

  2. "Is God on the side of the poor?"

    them from slavery and oppression; these people are poor people because they are slaves - therefore this story would suggest the poor are God's chosen people, 'his' people. What also must be taken into consideration is the fact that God forsaken idols and the Egyptians had created idols for Gods,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work