• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What influence did religion have on the development of medicine in the middle ages?

Extracts from this document...


What influence did religion have on the development of medicine in the middle ages? After the decline of the Roman Empire the two religions of Islam and Christianity took control over the development and progress of medicine. This period of time lasting from 1000AD till 1500AD was named the Middle Ages .During this time Islam and Christianity influenced medicine in both positive and negative ways in many areas of medicine; which will be analysed through this essay. The downfall of the roman empire had a dramatic affect on Europe and Asia the majority of their engineering and medical breakthroughs were lost forever. However some of their books were rescued from the ruins. The majority of these books were located in Europe in monasteries were they were translated by monks. These monks were the main contributors to the medical progress from a Christianity perspective. They read the books of Galen and Hippocrates and approved of their theories saying they fitted in with their beliefs about god. The acknowledgement and acceptation of Glens and Hippocrates theories was a highly influential step in the middle ages as it meant that medical knowledge could no longer go backwards in terms of knowledge. Although many spiritual beliefs did come back as influenced by the church. The church in the middle ages had most of the power and would do anything to keep people under control and under their power. ...read more.


These physicians showed very little medical knowledge at all and many of there patients died from the things they did to them; an Italian poet said "I have died of to many physicians". Surgery in these times was also poor because of the church people could not carry out dissections so therefore knowledge of the human body was minimal. People cut open pigs to learn about anatomy which wasn't very accurate. surgeons were generally part time workers they would usually be a butcher or a barber. European doctors were not all bad they did carry vademecums which were a little reference book which contain supersititious theories such as a zodiac man: this was the astrological theories behind illness. Each star sign related to a part of the body which is said to affect the person due to there birth sign e.g. During Pisces avoid cutting the feet. Also if a persons star sign was Pisces they would have trouble with their feet. As well as this and other supernatural theories it also contain a urine chart which told the doctor about the persons health due to what shade/colour it was. On the whole doctors in Europe were pritty bad and had little medical knowledge. Women were not allowed to train as doctors but there were "wise women" who would help the sick and advise them on spiritual cures. ...read more.


He wrote about many types of surgery including dentistry. Unlike Catholics the Arabs did set up hospitals the most famous being Al Mansur in Cairo. As well as looking after the sick in these hospitals doctors were trained there. They had separate wards for male and female patience wit quarantined areas for fevers, eye troubles and wounds. They introduce pharmacy and new drugs such as benzoine, camphor and myrrh. They also progressed in chemistry with the techniques of distillation and sublimation. Also paper was invented in china replacing papyrus so therefore Glens work and Arab doctor's work could be written down with ease and spread around quicker. The Arabs had a vast knowledge of diet and personal hygiene and knew many herbal remedies which were more effective than the superstitious treatments going on in western Europe. The only restriction was the fact that dissections were forbidden so knowledge of anatomy didn't progress. As shown throughout the essay both religions of Islam and Christianity had both positive and negative effects on medical development. Islam had more of a positive influence due to the fact they had more knowledge and dint go back to spiritual theories. The strong beliefs in god asserted by the catholic church restricted progression although the Koran did hold the Islamic doctors back just not as influentially. On the whole both religions helped in the treating and teaching of medical theories. Although neither religions provided for those who wanted to look for new theories/ideas. By Ben Mendo ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Places of Worship section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Places of Worship essays

  1. Why Were Hippocrates And Galen Influential For So Long?

    and introduced the use of opposites. Galen wrote 100 medical books that were very persuasive; he did not stress the polytheistic (more than one god) side of Roman culture - so he didn't offend the later monotheistic Muslims and Christians. Medicine had regressed since the Roman period, as people believed in more supernatural causes for illness

  2. In the Middle Ages how did religion both Help and Hinder medicine ?

    Christians believed in following what the Saints said. For example one Saint said that washing was wrong, so obviously after he said that many people did not wash, which would not rid them of dirt they had picked up. This definitely didn't help people to keep healthy, and it just shows how much people listened to the Saints.

  1. The process whereby religion looses its influence over social life and society is known ...

    This is evident in the churches decline in major institutions in society. The drop in vocations evident since the late 1960's is marked in the case of teaching orders. For example between 1970 and 1981 the number of sisters in primary schools decline by one-third and in secondary by one-quarter.

  2. Studies of Religion

    The Reform and Conservative variations are more lenient in this sense, with the Torah being read in the native language of the culture as well as the allowance of females to recite passages of the sacred texts.

  1. The Seventh-day Adventist ReligionThe Seventh-day Adventists (SDA) religion is a fast growing religion and ...

    It is preceded by instruction, a personal acceptance of the Scriptures, repentance of sins and confession of sins. Those who have reached an age of accountability and have been "born again" should be baptized by immersion in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

  2. Explore the presentation of the theme of religion in "Angela's Ashes"

    Once again, religion seems to take on the role of indoctrinating children. This quote specifically relates to an event which in Catholicism is considered to be a rite of passage; First Communion. The difference between what religion teaches and how it is experienced is shown by the following quote: "First

  1. I believe that Lutheranism was very revolutionary as it challenged the beliefs and practises ...

    the Reformation, primarily because they did not initially want to identify themselves with such a radical movement. It was dangerous for those in power under the rule of the Holy Roman Empire to become Lutheran because of the threat of Charles V.

  2. How useful are the secondary sources provided in understanding Medieval Monasticism compared with the ...

    Having a guesthouse also suggests that they had significant individuals going to stay in the abbey, which proves that it had power. Source B shows the people of the church giving advice to the King. This explains to a historian that the abbey had a lot of power and political

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work