What is a Parable? EXTENDED COURSEWORK

Authors Avatar

Ramin Rouhani

Contents

           Statement of Intent.                                         Page 2

Section A           Describe from Luke’s Gospel, how                 Page 3-7

   Jesus presented his teachings through

   Parables.        

Section B       Discuss the meaning and relevance of            Page 8-14

   Parables to the belief and life of Christians

   today.    

                       

Section C            Are these Parables still relevant today?            Page 15-16

                   

Statement of Intent

What is a Parable? In my coursework, I will establish the definition of a Parable, Biblical quotes and references, and the reasons for their use. I will establish these facts:

  • The use of Parables in Luke’s Good News Gospel
  • Examples of Parables that Jesus used
  • My personal opinions on the subject of Parables

I will use several different sources of information to complete the essay questions stated below. These sources include various Internet websites; books and my teacher.

The following questions (below) on the subject of Parables will be answered in this coursework:

A        Describe from Luke’s Gospel, how Jesus presented his teachings through Parables.

B        Discuss the meaning and relevance of Parables to the belief and life of Christians today.

C        Are these Parables still relevant today?

(A) Describe from Luke’s Gospel, how Jesus presented his teachings through Parables

        The term ‘Parable’ was taken from the Greek word ‘Parabole’ meaning an analogy or a comparison. However Jesus was not Greek, he was Jewish. The word ‘Parable’ in Hebrew is translated as ‘Marshal’, which means sayings, proverbs, similes, or close to an allegory. Both of these definitions can also be referred to as ‘earthly stories with heavenly meanings.’ It is made simple so the reader can have a greater understanding of the story. A good example of an allegory is the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Most Parables link into the Sermon on the Mount, due to it’s morals including forgiveness.

Jesus used Parables to act as pictures to tell these Parables. He was the main teacher of Parables. Parables have basic meanings, which teach us how to live, as God wants us to. These Parables are associated with everyday life, easy to understand and remember, and were very effective in Jesus’ ministry. Both Preachers and Teachers would use Parables as a way to explain the principle. A true Parable would not be explained after being told, so the listeners were left to think and discover the meanings for themselves. This is why they are referred to as ‘hidden meanings’. In the New Testament, Jesus used simple and short story Parables to exploit the hidden meanings behind it.

An ‘allegory’ is a representation of abstract ideas or principles by characters, figures or events in narrative, dramatic, or pictorial form. They can have more than one central point of teaching. The hidden messages have to be decoded, which makes it more difficult to understand than a true Parable.

A Parable had one central point of teaching in Jesus’ time and the other characters and details make this point more clear and distinct. The event and characters in a Parable are all realistic and are drawn from everyday life.

Christ’s Parables can fall into:

  1. The Kingdom of God has arrived – e.g. the Parable of the New Wine in Old Wineskin (5:36-39)
  2. Repentance and Forgiveness is the way into the Kingdom – e.g. the Parable of the Great Banquet (14:12-24)
  3. The Claims of the Kingdom – e.g. the Parable of the Good Samaritan 10:25-37)
  4. The Crisis of the Kingdom – e.g. the Parable of the Rich Fool (12:13-21)

The Parable of the New Wine in Old Wineskin (5:36-39) is known as a ‘Double Parable’ or a ‘Doublet’. That is where there are two Parables side by side with identical meanings.

“No one tears a piece from a new cloak to patch an old one; if he does, he will have made a hole in the new cloak, and the patch from the new will not match the old one”

(5:36)

        Jesus is pointing out how foolish it is to sew a patch of unshrunken material onto an old garment or to put new wine, still fermenting, into old skins that have lost their liability and have become brittle. A garment was a symbol for the world. The Jewish religion was worn out and could no longer be patched. Wine was a common symbol for salvation. Jesus had not come to reform Judaism but to present something new and revolutionary. Basically the old Judaism and new Christianity will not mix. There is something new and different in the ministry of Jesus what goes beyond the boundaries of Judaism.

The Parable of the great Banquet revolves around the theme of repentance and forgiveness. While Jesus was at the same dinner (14:1), he told his host that true happiness could be found by inviting those people to a meal who could not return the compliment, such as the poor, crippled, lame and blind (14:12-14). This led one of the guests to say:

“Happy the man who shall sit at the feast in the Kingdom of God”

        Jesus told the Parable of the Great Banquet in reply. A man gave a big dinner party and sent out many invitations. Some of the guests made excuses. So the host set out into the town and then into the country to invite others to take their places. None of the original guests would get a taste of the banquet.

        The Parable of the Good Samaritan was based around the theme of the claims of the Kingdom of God. This Parable arises from a question asked of Jesus by a lawyer who was trying to test Jesus. The original question the lawyer asked was:

“Master, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

(10:25)

        Jesus answered by asking a question in return. He asked the lawyer to tell him what the Law said. The lawyer made a good reply. To win eternal life one must love God and love your neighbour. Jesus congratulated him on his answer. The lawyer, however, still wished to win his argument and asked a second question:

Join now!

“Who is my neighbour?”

        Jesus replied with the Parable of the Good Samaritan. A man on his way to Jericho from Jerusalem, was attacked, robbed and left for dead. Both the Priest and Levite went without helping him. It was not that they were insensitive or evil men. The Law prevented them from helping. To touch a dead man or to come into contact with the blood of an injured person would make them unclean and meant that they carry out their duties. They put the claims of the Law first. The Samaritan stopped, helped and rescued the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay