• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by euthanasia?

Extracts from this document...


Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. Euthanasia may be carried out in the form of assisted suicide, voluntary active euthanasia or involuntary euthanasia. Euthanasia is usually carried out when it is better for a patient to die than to stay alive. Euthanasia is a matter that has caused great controversy in a number of South African court cases in the past and has usually been justified by doing what is in the best interests of the patient as we see in the case Clarke v Hurst1 In Discussion paper 71 the first critical question identified was whether, and if so, under what circumstances, the medical practitioner would be entitled to disconnect the life sustaining system of a person who was being kept 'alive' by a heart lung-machine or ventilator. In order to answer this question it was necessary to determine precisely when death sets in, and this is relatively the same medical question faced in Clarke v Hurst for the court to make a judgement. People especially moralists and persons with strong religious beliefs, often speculate in metaphysical ways about the concepts of life and death. ...read more.


remained to the patient.The patient's brain had permanently lost the capacity to induce a physical and mental existence at a level which qualified as human life and that in these circumstances, judged by society's legal convictions, the feeding of the patient did not serve the purpose of supporting human life as it is commonly known. The court held that the applicant appointed as curatix would act reasonably and would be justified in authorizing the discontinuing of the artificial feeding of the patient and would therefore not be acting wrongfully if she were to do so and would be doing it in the best interests of the patient. Although the court approached the interests of the patient with a strong predilection in favour of the preservation of life, it however did not extend as far as requiring that life should be maintained at all costs irrespective of its quality. Under the present law, voluntary euthanasia would except in certain narrow circumstances, be regarded as suicide in the patient who consents and murder in the doctor who administers, even on a linient view most lawyers would say that it could not be less than manslaughter in the doctor, the punishment for which, according to the jurisdiction and the degree of manslaughter, can be anything up to imprisonment for life. ...read more.


The fact that the patient was a member of SA Voluntary Euthanasia Society and had a 'Living Will' then has an amount of influence to the courts decision considering his quality of life but I think as the court highlighted in its judgement that normally this would not have been of any influence as the court would have been aiding the ends of suicide which most find morally wrong and at on behalf of the person actually carrying out the 'euthanasia' would be in reality an act of murder and this is why it is essential to establish when a person is actually dead. Considering all the facts of the argument above as well as the precedent set by the courts in the above cases euthanasia can be used as legal defence in South African criminal law but must be accordingly justified by determination of death so as to be distinguished from murder. It can be done also if it is in best interests of a patient and should be treated with a strict appriciation of life as it is clearly depicted in the judgement of the court in Clarke v Hurst. Name : Ndabezulu .T. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    Genesis 2:4-3:21: "Yahweh God took the man and settled him in the Garden of Eden to cultivate and take care of it". God has given us life to use it wisely and do his will which is taking care of the Earth.

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Key question no.2 - What are the case studies available on Euthanasia and what can be learned from them? I am going to be using the case study of Jack Kevorkian as he is one of the most famous and controversial people involved with Euthanasia.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    But according to their thought pattern, the basic goods cannot be compared and balanced off each other. They say that the key issue is whether an action is directly against a basic good. Alastair Campbell (12) writes of a woman named Anna.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    or withhold consent to treatment ' John Major, Former British Prime Minister, 1994 Some people oppose to the idea of having a living will, this applies especially to people who oppose euthanasia. They believe that no one, including the doctors, have the right to choose when they should die.

  1. The novel "Finding Grace", by Alyssa Brugman is the story of a brain damaged ...

    improves and the reader begins to see her react and respond to different situations. Rachel's relationship with Grace helps her to mature and discover who she really is. It is evident that the viewpoints of Rachel and Mr Preston have been foregrounded throughout the text.

  2. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    Surprisingly, although physician-assisted euthanasia is a hotly debated subject, they do to comment on it. The Orthodox Church states, "The Orthodox church opposes murder, whether it be suicide, euthanasia or whatever, and regardless if it is cloaked in terms like 'death with dignity'.

  1. A Study of Beliefs about Euthanasia between two religions: Unit 3B, Section 1.

    Christians also believe that we are all equal as human beings. Therefore someone who is paralysed in a wheelchair, unable to do anything for themselves and barely conscious has the same value of someone who is perfectly normal. This is because God is benevolent (all-loving)

  2. 'Acceptance of the practice of voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in ...

    It would be against God's will to end somebody's life because life is sacred and it is God as the omnipotent being that should have control over human life. It should be up to him to decide who lives or dies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work