• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism. Relativism is a fairly modern perspective of ethics, although Greek philosophers dabbled in it. It follows the belief that nothing is intrinsically right or wrong, thus each situation that we encounter merits a decision on the morality of our actions, for the actions in themselves are not morally right or wrong. The determinants of morality in relativism are far more complex. A relativist would argue that to judge the morality of actions in any given situation, we must look into the culture of those involved, we must look at the people involved, what they believe is right and wrong, and so-forth. Relativists believe that we can only know what is right or wrong by relating a given situation to others. Protagoras of Abdera was one of several fifth century Greek thinkers, collectively known as the Older Sophists, a group of travelling teachers or intellectuals who were experts in rhetoric and related subjects. ...read more.

Middle

It can also be criticised as the underlying principles in all societies are extremely similar, and whilst we may act on them differently; the practice of killing one's parents when they reach a certain age may be seen as cruel in Britain, but in Viking societies it was seen as helping them reach the afterlife; in both societies the action taken would be based on the underlying principle of loving and caring for your parents. Absolutism is precisely the opposite; an absolutist would argue that actions are intrinsically right or wrong in themselves, and their morality is fixed in all cultures, societies, all times and for all people. Hence an absolutist would not accept that in one culture it is deemed "morally acceptable" to carry out capital punishment, and in another it has been banned for moral reasons; an absolutist would accept one of the two points of view as the "moral" action, and dismiss the other as wrong. "Absolutists believe that the moral quality of an act is inherent in the quality of the act itself" (Jenkins). ...read more.

Conclusion

Also it seems that relativism is more of an excuse to avoid conflict than encourage moral behaviour. It is inconceivable that even the strongest believers of relativism would accept the opinion of their mother's murderer that it was a moral and just decision to that they made to kill her. Absolutism simply sets guidelines, and although a totalitarian absolutist rule of the world would be disastrous, the fact that we can accept differences in culture because of a similar basic moral foundation to their beliefs, (thou shalt not kill etc...). It would be impossible to maintain a society based on individual relativism, as rapists would be let rampant provided they believed in what they were doing, and murderers would be let off the hook provided they were angry enough/ drunk enough at the time of the murder to believe that their actions were moral. Absolutism is the only way to run a society successfully, and the only way to help with human rights in other countries. Luke Hodgkinson J6 LAK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Natural Law and absolutism

    Aquinas has based his theory on his experience of the world, not everyone's. What is Natural? Aquinas contradicts himself when he says that all humans should reproduce, as he himself was celibate. Many other people have been celibate, for example Mother Teresa; could somebody say that she did wrong?

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    They rely on the ability to predict the future. The fact that we aren't able to predict the future creates an element of uncertainty as to whether the consequences of an action will result in pleasure or pain. A utilitarian can guess in all probablility that an action will result in pleasure, but circumstances may be created in the future that will cause pain.

  1. Are Moral Values Objective Or Subjective?

    This seems a very likely possibility because it fits in with the way that a person will share similar moral values as the other people in their society and culture. Due to our lack of scientific knowledge however we are not capable of knowing whether babies can think morally and

  2. There is no point in marriage when you can live together in any case

    "you shall not commit adultery" (Exodus 20.14). Marriage is a sacrament and the couple is united with God and hope God blesses them with children as the purpose of marriage for a Christian is not just to live together but to become one flesh, have children and bring them up as Christians.

  1. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    For example, slavery was morally acceptable to most ancient Greeks but is not to most Europeans today. In other words, what was considered right for ancient Greeks would be wrong for today's Europeans and this is applicable to numerous other examples.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    Because human life isn't respected or valued. In short, to any teleological theory, murder could potentially be justified, and therefore proved to be the morally right thing to do. So, should the view of the sanctity of life be regarded as a moral absolute, and thus making abortion the morally right or wrong thing to do?

  1. Utilitarianism (Weaknesses and strengths)

    For Bentham an act is only right if it is instrumentally good (quality that leads to pleasure). The moral worth of an action over another action is proportional to the amount/quality of pleasure that one action brings. A more accurate account of the principle of utility would state: for all

  2. The philosophy of morality.

    With social relativism the problems are that there is no unanimity in society, how do you determine what society approves of? You can't one hundred percent, and if you were to reach a majority vote, is the majority right? Anyone who disagrees has to be wrong by definition, it is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work