• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism.

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism. Relativism is a fairly modern perspective of ethics, although Greek philosophers dabbled in it. It follows the belief that nothing is intrinsically right or wrong, thus each situation that we encounter merits a decision on the morality of our actions, for the actions in themselves are not morally right or wrong. The determinants of morality in relativism are far more complex. A relativist would argue that to judge the morality of actions in any given situation, we must look into the culture of those involved, we must look at the people involved, what they believe is right and wrong, and so-forth. Relativists believe that we can only know what is right or wrong by relating a given situation to others. Protagoras of Abdera was one of several fifth century Greek thinkers, collectively known as the Older Sophists, a group of travelling teachers or intellectuals who were experts in rhetoric and related subjects. ...read more.


It can also be criticised as the underlying principles in all societies are extremely similar, and whilst we may act on them differently; the practice of killing one's parents when they reach a certain age may be seen as cruel in Britain, but in Viking societies it was seen as helping them reach the afterlife; in both societies the action taken would be based on the underlying principle of loving and caring for your parents. Absolutism is precisely the opposite; an absolutist would argue that actions are intrinsically right or wrong in themselves, and their morality is fixed in all cultures, societies, all times and for all people. Hence an absolutist would not accept that in one culture it is deemed "morally acceptable" to carry out capital punishment, and in another it has been banned for moral reasons; an absolutist would accept one of the two points of view as the "moral" action, and dismiss the other as wrong. "Absolutists believe that the moral quality of an act is inherent in the quality of the act itself" (Jenkins). ...read more.


Also it seems that relativism is more of an excuse to avoid conflict than encourage moral behaviour. It is inconceivable that even the strongest believers of relativism would accept the opinion of their mother's murderer that it was a moral and just decision to that they made to kill her. Absolutism simply sets guidelines, and although a totalitarian absolutist rule of the world would be disastrous, the fact that we can accept differences in culture because of a similar basic moral foundation to their beliefs, (thou shalt not kill etc...). It would be impossible to maintain a society based on individual relativism, as rapists would be let rampant provided they believed in what they were doing, and murderers would be let off the hook provided they were angry enough/ drunk enough at the time of the murder to believe that their actions were moral. Absolutism is the only way to run a society successfully, and the only way to help with human rights in other countries. Luke Hodgkinson J6 LAK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Natural Law and absolutism

    Aquinas has based his theory on his experience of the world, not everyone's. What is Natural? Aquinas contradicts himself when he says that all humans should reproduce, as he himself was celibate. Many other people have been celibate, for example Mother Teresa; could somebody say that she did wrong?

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    These desires could be bad as well as good. He also said that Mill produces an "ought" from a statement of fact. Just because it is doesn't mean it ought to be that way. There is huge problem with all forms of utlitarianism. They rely on the ability to predict the future.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    to gain a real insight into the opinions of various groups, their reasoning for their views must be analysed. First of all, perhaps the largest force, in Britain and Europe at least, is the Catholic Church. The "rule-book", if you like, for the Catholic Church is the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

  2. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    This is backed up by Plato's argument that philosophers should become guardians in the state, as they know what is the best for the individual and the group and so it is obvious that they have acquired ethics in Plato's mind.

  1. A classmate has cheated. You have seen him/her. Discuss the several elements from a ...

    The coming essay will be divided into Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis which analyses several elements from a moral point of view using the theories in normative ethics concerning the case of cheating in the class. It is believed that human's behaviours are guided by certain rules, norms and values.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    would not be sacrificing anything of moral importance if we were to give that money to charity and keep enough clothes to stay warm. Singer is saying that most people would prefer to save a Bengali child from famine by donating money to charity while at the same time sacrificing some of their own luxuries.

  1. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    With in philosophy there are various approaches all of which attempt to explain the existence or non-existence of a moral fact. One such approach is utilitarianism; this is part of the teleological branch, which comes from the Greek word - 'telos' meaning end.

  2. Can Sympathy Provide A Satisfactory Basis For Morality?

    The quality or state of being thus affected by the suffering or sorrow of another; a feeling of compassion or commiseration. Hume's conception of morality stands in sharp contrast to a long philosophical tradition exemplified by the work of Spinoza that put reason at the heart of the philosophical account of the good life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work