What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point of view compared with absolutism. Relativism is a fairly modern perspective of ethics, although Greek philosophers dabbled in it. It follows the belief that nothing is intrinsically right or wrong, thus each situation that we encounter merits a decision on the morality of our actions, for the actions in themselves are not morally right or wrong. The determinants of morality in relativism are far more complex. A relativist would argue that to judge the morality of actions in any given situation, we must look into the culture of those involved, we must look at the people involved, what they believe is right and wrong, and so-forth. Relativists believe that we can only know what is right or wrong by relating a given situation to others. Protagoras of Abdera was one of several fifth century Greek thinkers, collectively known as the Older Sophists, a group of travelling teachers or intellectuals who were experts in rhetoric and related subjects. ...read more.

Middle

It can also be criticised as the underlying principles in all societies are extremely similar, and whilst we may act on them differently; the practice of killing one's parents when they reach a certain age may be seen as cruel in Britain, but in Viking societies it was seen as helping them reach the afterlife; in both societies the action taken would be based on the underlying principle of loving and caring for your parents. Absolutism is precisely the opposite; an absolutist would argue that actions are intrinsically right or wrong in themselves, and their morality is fixed in all cultures, societies, all times and for all people. Hence an absolutist would not accept that in one culture it is deemed "morally acceptable" to carry out capital punishment, and in another it has been banned for moral reasons; an absolutist would accept one of the two points of view as the "moral" action, and dismiss the other as wrong. "Absolutists believe that the moral quality of an act is inherent in the quality of the act itself" (Jenkins). ...read more.

Conclusion

Also it seems that relativism is more of an excuse to avoid conflict than encourage moral behaviour. It is inconceivable that even the strongest believers of relativism would accept the opinion of their mother's murderer that it was a moral and just decision to that they made to kill her. Absolutism simply sets guidelines, and although a totalitarian absolutist rule of the world would be disastrous, the fact that we can accept differences in culture because of a similar basic moral foundation to their beliefs, (thou shalt not kill etc...). It would be impossible to maintain a society based on individual relativism, as rapists would be let rampant provided they believed in what they were doing, and murderers would be let off the hook provided they were angry enough/ drunk enough at the time of the murder to believe that their actions were moral. Absolutism is the only way to run a society successfully, and the only way to help with human rights in other countries. Luke Hodgkinson J6 LAK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Natural Law and absolutism

    Aquinas has based his theory on his experience of the world, not everyone's. What is Natural? Aquinas contradicts himself when he says that all humans should reproduce, as he himself was celibate. Many other people have been celibate, for example Mother Teresa; could somebody say that she did wrong?

  2. Are Moral Values Objective Or Subjective?

    if they are born with an instinct for example to not kill, maybe they are not able to express themselves at such a young age.

  1. Assess The Strengths / Weaknesses Of Virtue Ethics

    Despite all these criticisms and problems that can be found, there are also a good number of strengths, for instance; Virtue theorists have noticed a couple things about human experience that are well worth noting. In the first place, they have understood the need to distinguish good people from legalists.

  2. Explain Virtue ethics - its strengths and weaknesses?

    are doing good and your wife will be very pleased that she hasn't got that task of cleaning them and therefore she will feel good and you yourself will be morally satisfied and your character traits will improve.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    Utilitarianism has been criticized for only looking at the results of actions, not at the desires or intentions which motivate them, which many people also consider important. An action intended to cause harm but that inadvertently causes good results would be judged equal to the result from an action done with good intentions.

  2. Can there be a coherent Relativism?

    The question of relativism raises a number of issues that must be dealt with before we attempt to assess the coherency of the thesis as a whole. The first of these, which I feel it necessary to address, is that of authority.

  1. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    This is otherwise known as the principal of utility. For example a government may decide to abolish taxes due, as for the majority of people having tax deducted from their wages causes certain pain. Thus a community of people can collectively decide whether action taken in the past or action

  2. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    For example, slavery was morally acceptable to most ancient Greeks but is not to most Europeans today. In other words, what was considered right for ancient Greeks would be wrong for today's Europeans and this is applicable to numerous other examples.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.