• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by the problem of suffering?

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by the problem of suffering? One of the greatest problems facing a believer in a good, all powerful God is the existence of evil and apparent undeserved suffering in the world. The problem has been presented by many different writes as a dilemma: Either God wishes to remove evil but is unable and therefore cannot be all - powerful, or he is able to remove evil but is unwilling and therefore cannot be wholly good. The reality of evil becomes "The Problem of Suffering" if one accepts the traditional attributes associated with the monotheistic doctrines of Christian Theology: o God is absolutely good and compassionate o God controls all events in history because he is omnipotent and omniscient The assumption is that a good God would eliminate evil as far as he s able. Given that he is all-powerful therefore he should eliminate it all. However evil exists. In other words God has the means (power) and the motivation (love, goodness) to eliminate evil. So why doesn't he? One of the issues within the problem of suffering is the actual origin of suffering. If God created or caused all things then clearly he is the originator of evil. Some people would also want to differentiate between the problem of evil and suffering. The problem of suffering is often seen as having a slightly different emphasis. It focuses more on the experience of the evil and so addresses the problem on a more personal level. ...read more.


It also correctly observes that this, in turn, leads to disharmony within the human race and towards the animal world as well as damage to the environment. What it fails to explain is natural calamities and animal suffering, which most people believe existed long before man came into existence. Therefore how can man be to blame for these problems, thus making Augustians theodicy not as strong as it could have been. Augustine could explain this on the basis of a prior fall of angels, led by Lucifer. Their rebellion consisted of causing animals to prey upon one another as well as upsetting the stability of the earth's crust thus causing earthquakes and volcanoes. This view can easily be criticised on several counts. There is the problem, first raised by Schleiermacher, of why the first creatures, angels or humans, whose natures contained no flaw and who lacking nothing, would have sinned, even if they were formally free to do so, when they were in the presence of God and enjoying his happiness. The Bible does not say that man was originally in the full presence of God and John Calvin, uncharacteristically, says that man's original condition was "...weak, frail and liable to fall." In a sense the first beings did not have everything, for they were limited in power and it only requires the desire for something that cannot be obtained, like having total power to become like God, for sin to occur. ...read more.


Who knows if the Ten Commandments are correct and if we do wrong we can just pray and all is forgiven? How are we meant to know that? It is ridiculous that we are going to heaven when we do not know the line to go there. There is no atonement necessary and the end never justifies the means. Christians have rejected the Irenaean Theodicy because it ignores a lot of the key doctrines such as "The fall, Incarnation and Judgement". How can such a painful creative process be the expression of divine goodness and is all the pain and suffering worth it? It also calls into question the nature of freewill because if everyone is saved where is the free choice to decide. There is also no requirement or incentive to act morally if the outcome is eternal salvation. Finally some suggest it is inappropriate to suggest some good comes out of suffering. In conclusion, both arguments fail to find a suitable reason for the problem of evil and suffering, they mainly discuss salvation and God not wanting to interfere and letting us to decide for ourselves. However they never truly have a reason for natural evil and even moral evil why it was created or have the ability to create harm. He should have just not invented the idea to harm. Therefore neither theodicies provide appropriate evidence for the problem of evil and suffering. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Gibson Miss Newton Evil and Suffering Page 1 of 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. 1.) Compare and contrast the Augustinian and Irenaean theodicies and their attempts to solve ...

    with immense capacity for spiritual and moral development, the idea being that the human race was created in a state of imperfection leading to a state of perfection. In other words, humans are being created into children of God. Thus perfection, rather than lying in the past, lies in the future.

  2. What is the problem of evil?

    Despite certain advantages that Augustine's theodicy has it has been criticized for containing logical, scientific and moral error. The logical problem has been expressed by F.D.E. Schleiermacher who argued that was a logical contradiction in saying that a perfectly created world has gone wrong, since that would mean that evil has created itself out of nothing, which is logically impossible.

  1. Show how the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine account for natural evil.

    To conclude, Irenaeus thought that the existence of evil actually serves a purpose. He sees man as having been created imperfect and immature who then has to develop morally and spiritually to achieve perfection intended by God. This process is referred to s 'soul-making'.

  2. What do religious believers mean by 'the problem of suffering'?

    he did not make a perfect world, as true goodness has to be developed rather than ready made. True goodness requires free will, which therefore justifies the existence of evil. The Irenaean theodicy justifies the existence of actual evil, both moral and natural, by maintaining it possesses the power to enable us to aspire and develop towards perfection.

  1. Explain how natural evil may be seen as a challenge to belief in God ...

    It all depends on the situation, and what happened to you. Sometimes you can grow in an evil way, for example often people who have been abused grow up to abuse. In some parts of the theodicy Irenaes appeared to be quite vague, so John Hick ( a modern day philosopher)

  2. Good and Evil

    when there is an absence of human wish, which leads to an immoral action; this means it can be a type of evil that humans implement unwillingly. Thomas Aquinas stated that because God is 'infinitely good' to allow evil there must be no god, so his point was that evil is not real and it only exists in our minds.

  1. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    He viewed creation as wholly good in that God created a perfect world but that evil was the breakdown of some aspect of creation caused by something else. In this theory evil is considered to be a "privatio bonni," a privation of good rather than a substance in itself and

  2. Explain What Is Meant By Natural Law

    Thomas Aquinas. When Aristotle's theories reached the Western World, many people disapproved theories such as Causation and Natural Law, because it revolved around the idea of there being a Prime Mover instead of the God of Classical Theism, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work