• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the problem of evil?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Problem of evil 1) What is the problem of evil? The problem of evil concerns the challenge of how an all-powerful and all-loving God can allow his creation to suffer, without helping then and putting an end to their suffering. This challenge is an often quoted reason for being unable to believe in God for it is argued, either God does not exist or, if he does then he is not a God worthy of out worship. Followers of the God of classical theism acknowledge the existence of one God only who is the omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent creator of the universe. This God, in principle, should be able to remove all occurrences of evil in the world - both moral evil such as rape and murder and natural evil such as earthquakes and floods. However, it is quite clear to us that both evil and suffering continue to exist which leads us to the following dilemma. * Since God alone created the universe out of nothing he has total responsibility for everything in it. If he is omnipotent then he can do anything that is logically possible which means he could have created a world that was free from evil and suffering, it also means that should he had allowed it to come about then he could end it all if he wanted to. ...read more.

Middle

The scientific problems are that in Augustine's theodicy the world was made perfect by God and then damaged by humans. This contradicts evolutionary theory, which states that the universe has continually been developing from a state of chaos. The second major weakness is that Augustine's assumption that each human being was seminally present in Adam. This theory must be rejected on biological grounds, which means that we are not guilty for Adam's sin and God is not just in allowing us to suffer for someone else's sin. One moral difficulty within Augustine's theodicy concerns his concept of hell. Hell appears to be part of the design of the universe. This means that God must have already anticipated that the world would go wrong - and have accepted it. Finally, although Augustine argued that God's selection of some people for Heaven shows His mercy, others would argue that it displays irrational inconsistency, further questioning God's goodness. Overall I think that Augustine's theodicy does not work as there are too many criticisms that do not really explain the problem of evil. Irenaues (AD 130-202) followed Augustine in tracing evil back to human free will. Unlike Augustine, Irenaeus admitted that God is partly responsible for evil. His responsibility extends to creating humans imperfectly as genuine human perfection cannot be ready made, but must develop though free choice. This is based on Irenaeus' interpretation of Genesis 1:26 where good said 'Let us make man in out image, after our likeness'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Irenaeus' theodicy does not deal with the problem of what happens to the people who die, if their souls are left to float around the earth or come back in different bodies or if you have not achieved God's likeness in one lifetime then you can never go to heaven. If the latter is true then this means that only the last generation of humans that achieve God's likeness would go to heaven and that the rest of the world would have lived in suffering and died in vain for these chosen few. Finally, it can be said love can never be expressed by allowing any amount of suffering, no matter what the reason. D.Z. Phillips argued that it would never be justifiable to hurt someone in order to help them. This again can be argued by saying that free will is the reason for this and it is necessary if God wants us to eventually develop into his likeness. So in conclusion I think that Irenaeus' theodicy is quite successful in trying to solve the problem of evil as he says that God is both omnipotent and omnibenevolent but the only reason he allows evil to exist is so that we become better people because of in and all eventually develop into his likeness and end up in heaven. However the criticisms show us that is not a full answer to the problem of evil as it is a very complex problem. Kajal Patel 4 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    This quote is saying that if evil and suffering exists in the world and humans try to become to the likeness of God what is the point if everyone is going to go to heaven?

  2. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    By this he meant that we could not develop in a perfect world, we therefore need challenge and struggles. Humans will be rewarded for their suffering eventually in heaven and those who do not reach the likeness of God before death can continue to develop in purgatory.

  1. The problem of evil.

    If these occurrences were dubbed as "privations of good" the sufferers may feel as though the actions were being justified. Most people however accept that evil exists. Christianity, Judaism and Islam contain teachings about instances of evil such as Jesus' persecution by the Roman's and we are faced with the

  2. Good and Evil

    Furthermore Christians would say it is the goodness of God Himself, not evil which created the universe and everything of existence in it; which successfully brought everything in it into being, therefore the power of good must be an even stronger force than evil.

  1. Why does God allow Evil if he is omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly benevolent?

    When coming down to it, I think that god can not be omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly benevolent at the same time. It seems as though these things have been inaccurately planned out by religious people and by sawing inaccurately planned out I mean that they do not fit together as

  2. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    the belief that science and religion are attempting to answer different questions, is not. Many people believe that science attempts to answer how the universe was created, the actual physical machinations of how the world was created; but religion offers an explanation as to why the universe was created.

  1. Discuss the Problem of Evil

    Evil is only there for us to overcome and by facing evil, learn from it: The most painful mistakes we make are normally the ones that teach us the greatest lessons (e.g.

  2. The Holocaust - personal response to Anne Frank's diary and the problem of evil ...

    Fundamentally, the persecution of 6 million Jews strongly opposes the Jewish belief that they were god?s ?chosen? and favoured people. Controversially, Genesis 12: 1-3, quotes of how the Jews were god?s most hated and despised people. In some ways, this was justified as they were of course rejected by god in this tragic event!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work