• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the relationship between religion and morality?

Extracts from this document...


What is the relationship between religion and morality? Humanists and atheists see no connection between religion and ethics, arguing that it is possible to be ethical without being religious. However, others contend that ethics and religion are inseparable, a common view held by Muslims, Christians, Hindus and Jews. An atheist would hold the view that morals are independent of God (autonomy.) Humanists hold strong ethical beliefs, however, deny the existence of a supernatural being. A key question here is, do morals come from God? If not, where do they come from? Do religious people stand a better chance of being moral than non- religious people? Plato asked the key question 'is x good because God commands it or does God command it because x is good? The view that moral rules are true by virtue of being commanded by God is called the divine command theory. 'The good consists in always doing what God wills at any particular moment.' Emil Brunner. The philosopher Gottfried Leibniz writes: '... in saying that things are not good by any rules of goodness, but merely the will of God, it seems to me that one destroys, without realizing it, all the love of God and all his glory. ...read more.


Since a religious person does his good deed not necessarily for its own sake, but because he has been instructed to do so by God, by Kant's definition, his act is non- moral. Kant's definition is a challenge to religion for it suggests that one can be both 'irreligious' and moral. Acting autonomously, doing right for its own sake, suggests that the right to choose what is right. It is contended that religion provides people with a reason to be moral, because if there were no God, then everything would be permitted or permissible. If we don't have God or religion, then we need to justify acting morally. Arguable, we could act morally to do our duty to others, or perhaps on the desire to have a civilized society. However, it could be reasonable to act selfishly and look after you own best interests. Peter Singer states that 'Why act morally cannot be given an answer that will provide everyone with overwhelming reasons for acting morally. Ethically indefensible behavior is not always irrational. We will probably always need the sanctions of the law and social pressure to provide additional reasons against serious violations of ethical standard.' In conclusion, we all have beliefs concerning the nature of humanity. ...read more.


Currently, Religious education is not part of the national curriculum, but by law all schools have to provide it.' The qualifications and curriculum authority, which regulates the curriculum, is currently drawing up a national framework for religious education. The report comes as French politicians voted to ban all religious symbols, including Islamic headscarves, Christian crosses and Jewish skullcaps from schools. But, recent research suggests that 2/3 of schools aren't providing sufficient religious education, and inspectors have warned that as a result, 'spiritual values' were not being fixed in the children's minds. In conclusion, although it would seem religion is a plausible subject to teach, only 7% of Britain's populations are regular church goers. Therefore, it could be argued that teaching religious studies to children would be of no help. Indeed, perhaps the morality of society is more linked in with society as a whole, and the behavior of the majority. Although it could be said that religion helps combat prejudices within a society, religion should not be enforced on youngsters. Perhaps a system of philosophy or 'social' education would be a better system, offering children the same set of principles as religion and the same set of guidelines, as a religion would offer, without forcing them to practice religious ideas such as communion. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    Does this mean that whatever actions are necessary to obtain pleasure are morally correct.The weakness in this attitude is that what may gain pleasure for one may cause pain for another. Is this still morally correct? Whether a person is a relativist or an asolutist it could be said that

  2. In the essay "On The Rainy River," the author Tim O'Brien tells about his ...

    They affect not only your mental identity but also your physical identity as well. Like how your look and how you dress. How you get along with people and how you treat others is often an affected by the group of people you are around most of the time.

  1. In this essay I will talk about this question Do we need God to ...

    Other people believe that someone may have been bad before they believed in god then when they did become religious and started to believe in god that made them god so maybe believing in god does give a better understanding of right and wrong.

  2. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    My argument against these points is that one would very naturally feel a stronger connection with someone closer to one than with a person further away. This would lead one to feel a stronger responsibility to help that person if they were in need of assistance, and would mean that

  1. How Plausible is Cultural Relativism

    Examples of 'good' or 'yellow' things can be given but they themselves are ultimately indefinable. G.E. Moore claimed that all moral judgements are therefore based on a fallible intuitive knowledge of good things. Prichard built on this and differentiated between two types of thinking: general reasoning and moral intuition.

  2. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    This is similar to the contemporary 'just government argument' put forward by Bentham, which argues that our obligation to pursue justice is moral and unconditional. Living in a society of justice and obeying it's rules by consent will therefore make the individual just and in this way, the moral virtue of justice is upheld by those who follow the laws.

  1. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    a Hobbesian society, as taking this approach enables us to advocate the social contract theories of Hobbes And Rousseau, whereby we form societies, so as to avoid the dangerous Hobbesian state of nature. In this way we are, genetically predisposed to form a social contract.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    However, many utilitarians would argue that utilitarianism applies not only to results, but also to desires and dispositions, praise and blame, rules, institutions, and punishment. For instance, bad intentions may cause harm (to the actor and to others) even if they do not result in bad acts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work