• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century? The word teleological came from the Greek word telos, which means end or purpose. The nature of this is that something positive occurs. It is usually known as a design argument. All design arguments are inductive and a posteriori; there are numerous types of arguments with various philosophers giving them different names. The Teleological Argument is one of the famous design arguments and has been disputed by many philosophers but also design arguments in general. Teleology, in philosophy is about a term applied to any system attempting to explain events in terms ends, purposes and objectives that are trying to be achieved. William Paley (1743-1805) developed the Teleological Argument further. He said that, one day you were walking in a forest and you saw a stone, it would be absurd to ask how did the stone get there in the first place. First of all, a person would not likely ask a question such as that about the stone but the stone could have been there all the time and so a conclusion will not be discovered. However, if you were walking in the forest one day, as you were walking you noticed a watch and then examined the watch to work out its function, you would come to the conclusion that the designer of the watch is intelligent and it is not product of random formation. ...read more.

Middle

Death is provided to end suffering for a particular person, which indicates a sympathetic God. There have been many criticisms of the Design Argument. One of the criticisms came from David Hume. He criticised the argument twenty-three earlier before Paley developed the argument. He said that the concept of a design was limited. How could people assume that God designed a world or even the universe when we do not know what it is like to design a world and so how can we be sure of a designer? If the world was designed, God might not have designed the world since the world is finite and contains defects. If like causes have like effects then there is no reason to argue for an infinitive perfect designer. Since there is existence of evil and suffering, this cannot really support a conclusion of a good and perfect God. There could have been a committee of gods that created the universe. He said that the universe could be unique; it might have came in existence naturally like flowers. He also said that matter could have inner tendency towards order. A vegetable is a result of order that arises naturally. When people look at a vegetable, they do not consider who designed the vegetable. The same could be said about the universe, people see the universe as a clock instead of a vegetable. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any single minor change, for example, the strong nuclear force, life would not exist. It has lead to thinkers that the universe seems to be designed for the development of life. The Anthropic Principle has its weak points and its strong points. The weak points are that if things were not as they would not have been here to notice the Anthropic Principle. Another weak point is that it is self-evident. The strong points are that it claims it is the fortuitous string of chances is an indication of a designer. Another strong point is that it would point out that it would that it resorts to the concept of chance, with its difficulties. Teleologists have frequently identified the purpose in the universe with God's will. The Teleological Argument for the existence of God holds that order within the world cannot be accidental and that there is a designer. For the Design Argument to be taken seriously it must notice its facts about the world from which it is working from. The facts include Natural Selection: the presence of beauty and the higher human capacities, human beings causing pain to each other are beyond the control of human beings. However, the argument relies on probability and judgements made by individuals. The argument requires more persuasiveness than to its own logic. Since science is continually expanding, the argument requires logic and different scientific views will have different opinions about the creation of the universe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    This brings me to my conclusion. There are many people in the world who believe that God exists, and their proof is things such as the lacteal system, the human ability to appreciate the things we have, the apparent order in the world, and life itself.

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    (The Blind Watchmaker, p.13) Theist, Richard Swinbuurne believes that Dawkins is misleading because he ignores a chief premise of the Argument from Design; whether or not there is a sense of purpose of our existence. For those who believe there is, Darwin has not provided an ultimate explanation one way

  1. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    In the Holy Quran there are many verses which state that there is only one God and that he is the creator and Lord of everything that exists. Muslims believe in 'Thauhid' which believes that there is only one God who has no partners.

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    Further more another important design argument was by St. Thomas Aquinas. He used the fifth of his five ways, 'From the Governance of Things'. Like Paley this argument is also 'From design'. He argued that "Non-intelligent material things produce beneficial order and therefore require an intelligent being to bring this about i.e.

  1. Bereshit, the first word in Genesis translates to "in a beginning"

    Deciphering this would enable a better understanding of the nature of God's creative activity. Here the question is whether God's first creative act is in verse 6: "but streams/mist came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground" or verse 7: "the Lord God formed the

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    it is impossible for people to know what God created or God himself. The big bang provides a scientific explanation about the beginning of the universe. Scientific explanation has observed that there was a beginning to the universe and it developed an early structure very early in its development.

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    Richard Swinburne (1930) 'The Existence of God', placed forward an argument to defend the validity of the idea of regularity in the world He used the analogy of a person who had been kidnapped and locked in a room with a card shuffling machine, shuffling ten packs of cards.

  2. A Unverse Wthout A Master - In the twentieth century, the existing individual has ...

    However a man has to decide his own actions without any influence which requires to live without appeal. His decisions should not be affected by the universal laws given by the master. When a man makes decisions according to those laws, he would be choosing the truths that they define.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work