• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What place is there for the Design Argument in the 21st Century? The word teleological came from the Greek word telos, which means end or purpose. The nature of this is that something positive occurs. It is usually known as a design argument. All design arguments are inductive and a posteriori; there are numerous types of arguments with various philosophers giving them different names. The Teleological Argument is one of the famous design arguments and has been disputed by many philosophers but also design arguments in general. Teleology, in philosophy is about a term applied to any system attempting to explain events in terms ends, purposes and objectives that are trying to be achieved. William Paley (1743-1805) developed the Teleological Argument further. He said that, one day you were walking in a forest and you saw a stone, it would be absurd to ask how did the stone get there in the first place. First of all, a person would not likely ask a question such as that about the stone but the stone could have been there all the time and so a conclusion will not be discovered. However, if you were walking in the forest one day, as you were walking you noticed a watch and then examined the watch to work out its function, you would come to the conclusion that the designer of the watch is intelligent and it is not product of random formation. ...read more.

Middle

Death is provided to end suffering for a particular person, which indicates a sympathetic God. There have been many criticisms of the Design Argument. One of the criticisms came from David Hume. He criticised the argument twenty-three earlier before Paley developed the argument. He said that the concept of a design was limited. How could people assume that God designed a world or even the universe when we do not know what it is like to design a world and so how can we be sure of a designer? If the world was designed, God might not have designed the world since the world is finite and contains defects. If like causes have like effects then there is no reason to argue for an infinitive perfect designer. Since there is existence of evil and suffering, this cannot really support a conclusion of a good and perfect God. There could have been a committee of gods that created the universe. He said that the universe could be unique; it might have came in existence naturally like flowers. He also said that matter could have inner tendency towards order. A vegetable is a result of order that arises naturally. When people look at a vegetable, they do not consider who designed the vegetable. The same could be said about the universe, people see the universe as a clock instead of a vegetable. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any single minor change, for example, the strong nuclear force, life would not exist. It has lead to thinkers that the universe seems to be designed for the development of life. The Anthropic Principle has its weak points and its strong points. The weak points are that if things were not as they would not have been here to notice the Anthropic Principle. Another weak point is that it is self-evident. The strong points are that it claims it is the fortuitous string of chances is an indication of a designer. Another strong point is that it would point out that it would that it resorts to the concept of chance, with its difficulties. Teleologists have frequently identified the purpose in the universe with God's will. The Teleological Argument for the existence of God holds that order within the world cannot be accidental and that there is a designer. For the Design Argument to be taken seriously it must notice its facts about the world from which it is working from. The facts include Natural Selection: the presence of beauty and the higher human capacities, human beings causing pain to each other are beyond the control of human beings. However, the argument relies on probability and judgements made by individuals. The argument requires more persuasiveness than to its own logic. Since science is continually expanding, the argument requires logic and different scientific views will have different opinions about the creation of the universe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    Any slight variation in any of the mathematical laws of the universe would create chaos.' Therefore, this means that the fact that the world is designed means there is a designer - God. Today, modern science is also been able to produce evidence in support of the teleological argument.

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    There is no real way to conclude the arguments. In this way, the design argument is failing again. Another theist, Emmanuel Kant pointed out in his argument, that the argument for a divine designer depends on the assumption that there is actually design in the universe.

  1. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    However, atheists can argue that the universe could not have been created by God as we haven't any clear evidence to prove the existence of God. We cannot see God so how can we believe in Him? How can God be all-knowing and love his creation when evil and suffering continues to dwell in certain parts of the world?

  2. Outline and Critically Evaluate the design Argument

    Supporters of this design are Tennant and Swinburne. Swinburne concludes that the cosmos could just as easily be chaotic as it is governed. The fact that it is not, to him, suggests design and a designer, over ruling chance and coincidence.

  1. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    It is just assumed that God is responsible without explaining how. Whereas Natural selection can and does empirically explain the organised complexity of the universe: "Our own existence once presented the greatest of all mysteries, but...it is a mystery no longer....Darwin and Wallace solved it".

  2. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    What are the strengths of the design argument? Comment on some of the criticisms raised against the design argument. After describing the Design Argument, and the Anthropic Principle, I now intend to focus on the strengths of the argument, and then I will comment on the criticisms of the argument, as put forward by various philosophers.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Design qua purpose looks at the evidence of design and how parts of the universe fit together for a purpose. The first part of the philosopher William Paley's argument, derived from design qua purpose. He expresses his argument in a simple analogy, if one was to come across a watch

  2. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    Theology does not only use the material it goes beyond. Thomas states that as God is the subject matter of Theology and as such is "the One of Supreme Worth and as such theology must be Queen of Science". (Redford, 2002.P.16).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work