What would a modern athlete find strange about the organisation of the ancient Olympics?

Authors Avatar

James Mayes

4 Alpha

Classical Civilisation Coursework

Q. What would a modern athlete find strange about the organisation of the ancient Olympics?

A modern day athlete would find many things strange about the ancient Olympics and I will try and highlight theses during this piece of coursework.

The preparation of the ancient Olympics varies in many ways to that of the modern Olympics.  What we have to understand is that nowadays-modern athletes are considered professional and this is their job. Whereas during the ancient era athletes would use athletics as a chance to gain respect and to be fit for war which was ongoing in all of ancient Greece. A modern athlete would find strange that the ancient games where held for Greeks only and that no person outside of Greece was allowed to compete.

Athletics were a key part of education in ancient Greece. Many Greeks believed that developing the body was equally important as improving the mind for overall health. Also, regular exercise was important in a society where men were always needed for military service.

This picture shows the athletes training for the javelin event in the ancient Olympics. Javelins would be used in warfare as well, so for many men the use of the javelin would provide experience for use when it comes to war. The modern athletes would see that when using the javelin they would use a leather thong that they would tie around their hand, to what they believed to propel the javelin even further.

 Ancient athletes were required to arrive at Olympia at least a month before the games were due to start in order to train in front of the hellanodikai who were local judges and they would judge the competitors fitness during that month. During this month athletes would compete in heats, against   other competitors from Greece. We know that athletes would compete in heats from the accounts of Diagoras from Rhodes who competed in the boxing event. This is similar to the modern Olympics where athletes would stay at an Olympic village before the start of the games to acclimatise themselves to the conditions of that particular country where the games are being held. Heats would be frequent in view to find the greatest athlete in the world.

  Olympia was a vast site and all athletes would stay on site in Olympia would could be described as becoming a small village for five days every four years. Athletes would stay in the Leonidaion that would be described as a hotel for the athletes. This is the equivalent to the Olympic village in the modern Olympics.

 The religious aspect of the games can be seen by the fact that oaths were taken. These were taken in front of the temple of Zeus, as if to say that Zeus will know if you cheat and this will place fear in the competitors. All competitors and judges will take this oath, as the ancient Olympic games were a religious event in honour of the gods and more importantly Zeus. Modern athletes would find this strange as the modern Olympics are now for personal and country’s glory, and no religious elements are now involved so athletes would find it strange about the religious element. I suppose that you could compare the oath taken by athletes in the ancient Olympics could be compared to the honesty that is needed by modern day athletes in the modern Olympics to which no performance enhancing drugs are allowed. We can see that the oaths were taken seriously by the fact that Pausanias who recorded some of the aspects and I gather the quote from his works “The statue of Zeus strikes terror into the hearts of all who see it. It is the custom of the athletes, as well as their fathers, brothers and trainers, to swear an oath beside the statue.’ What this shows is that the religious element of the games and the oaths that were taken by the athletes struck fear into them that Zeus would know, it emphasises that even though it was just a statue competitors would still find it daunting and would be less likely to break the rules with Zeus’s wrath their punishment.  

 The Olympic truce that was enforced by the hellanodikai was to grant all citizens who intended on travelling to Olympia a safe passage through the country. Greece was a country that was often at war, not as a country but with its many city-states would be at war at any given moment. The truce stated that, as most competitors were warriors from their own city-state, all wars that were going at that time, would have to be suspended for the duration of the Olympic games, thus providing competitors and spectators alike a safe passage to Olympia. No armies would be allowed to enter the precinct of Olympia, as it was a religious site in honour of Zeus. Greeks who face the death penalty would face a lucky chance to cheat death as the truce stated that during the month of truce no death penalties would take place. Modern athletes would find this strange, as even though wars are less infrequent, and would see the truce as being strange because it was all because of the fact that the Olympic games was purely a religious event.

Join now!

 The ancient games were purely a religious event in honour of the god Zeus, and what a modern athlete would find strange about the organisation is that unlike the modern Olympics where competitors compete for their own personal glory or that of their country. We can see that this was a religious event as out of the five days; two and a half were devoted to religious activities. The religious aspect of the games could be seen by the fact that the altar of Zeus was the focus of the altis and was purely religious and very visible. We can ...

This is a preview of the whole essay