• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whose Life Is It Anyway?

Extracts from this document...


The main theme that rounds throughout the play are those of: life and death, decisions, responsibility and authority. The story is about a paralysed sculptor who wants to end his life against the wishes of the authorities (the Doctors). The main characters are Ken - the paralysed man, Dr.Emerson and Dr.Scott. In addition to this their is John, Nurse Saddler, the Sister, the Judge and they two lawyers, though these last 3 characters only make a brief appearance in Act Two. The play is mainly set in Ken's room in the hospital occasionally going to the Nurses Office. There is a lot of conflict between Ken and Dr.Emerson; it represents the occurrence of a person with a debilitating illness fighting against the authority for their rights. It also represents the strong views Doctors have for saving life at all costs. Brian Clarke uses the conflict of opinion to create dramatic tension that draws the audience in to the reality of life. ...read more.


Clarke introduces a clash between Ken and Dr.Emerson in the first meeting. When Dr.Emerson first meets Ken he is patronising towards him and when he refers to Ken's problems he refers to them as our problems 'Dr.Emerson: ... we have almost overcome it all...' It is not very thoughtful and it is very patronising, Ken then says 'Ken: you only grow the vegetables here - the vegetable store is somewhere else' This shows that Ken is under stress when he is told that he will remain in hospital for the rest of his life in another ward. Dr.Emerson says that he is the best person to make Ken's decisions for him. 'Ken: I think not Dr.Emerson: You can't decide that' Dr.Emerson then sticks the needle into Ken, this creates dramatic tension between the two characters for the rest of the play. As the conflict develops Ken calls in Mr.Hill, his solicitor after Ken expresses his wish to be discharged so that he can die. ...read more.


Ken: I'll get a room somewhere. Dr.Emerson: There's no need. Ken: Don't let's... Dr.Emerson: We'll stop treatment, remove drips. Stop feeding you if you like.' At this Ken is left in the hospital to die, as he wished. Ken's presence as an individual is shown throughout the play, he is on his own with only his own judgement to go on. On the other hand Dr.Emerson is extremely authoritarian telling everyone what to do just to keep Ken alive, which some people would view to be unfair. The length of scenes is kept short throughout, this is to enhance the tension between the characters before the long court scene at the end. It is also rather unique that the court is in the hospital as this brings a new type of atmosphere to the play. The audience is led to sympathise with Ken through Dr.Emerson getting him sectioned and forcing him to stay alive against his own wishes. This is what keeps the audience interested - this conflict. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    Ken with what are basically the same words to show two different points. These two sentences have a high importance, which makes them one of the most memorable quotations from the play. The analysis of the play suggests that the author purposely placed the end point in the very last

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    In my project I could have used more books as this have very reliable and non-bias information within. The main reason why I didn't use many books was because the books I was looking at were quite expensive and I didn't want to be spending much money on books I might never read again.

  1. Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his ...

    In the first half of the play medical jargon is used between the medical staff whilst discussing Ken's condition: 'the aminophylline or the huge stat dose of cortisone', 'Two milligrams T.I.D.'. Otherwise we hear medical jargon from Dr. Emerson to Ken to confuse or convince Ken that these drugs or

  2. Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own ...

    Injections dull his conscience so the only part of his body that can function is now ceased. It is easy for the doctors but it isn't for him. Being a patient, he is seen as a patient and not as a normal person.

  1. Analysis of a Scene From Brookside

    cameras, lighting, editing, dialogue, costume, action. I will now go on to analyse the scene. The editing is quite talented, it builds up a sense of anxiety within each shot and within the character. This is done by editing the shots so that they are only a few seconds long this single-handedly builds up the drama.

  2. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    The first few pages of the play portray this when he is making sexual jokes towards the younger nurse, Kay. Nurse- "Wipe your hands and put the pillows behind Mr. Harrison; we don't want to have him on the floor."

  1. How far does the film 'whose life is it anyway' succeed in persuading you ...

    'Every time I look at you I see whatever I cannot do, and what I will never do again'. 'I don't want any part of it anymore, I want you to leave here and never come back'. As he speaks harshly to his girlfriend whilst she runs off in tears.

  2. How does Brian Clark interest and entertain his Audience in the play 'Whose Life ...

    In other peoples opinion it is suggested that a person so intelligent as to put up a suitable case is in theory 'too good' to die. This is what Ken considers catch 22,a no win situation, he is trapped. I do not believe that it is fair to a person

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work