• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whose life is it anyway?

Extracts from this document...


Whose life is it anyway? The case centres around Ken Harrison's determination to exercise his right to die rather than live in a state of physical helplessness. As a result of a road accident, Mr Harrison suffered a multitude of injuries, which included a severed spinal cord. The prognosis was bleak - he had limited facial movements and was totally paralysed form the neck downwards. Throughout his time in hospital he maintains, much to the medical profession's objection, his right to have the choice whether to live or die. The issues involved in the case are more poignant because of the nature of Ken's personality. He is described by Dr Emerson as 'an intelligent, sensitive and articulate man.' ...read more.


The case against Ken's wishes to have treatment removed is put by various members of the medical profession. It is a fact, that all the people in the medical profession take the Hippocratic Oath which means they must do all in their power to preserve life. So, ken has an uphill struggle to persuade them against the 'forces of the medical bureaucracy.' Dr Scott does not know how to deal with Ken's forceful demands, so she states that he is depressed and prescribes the tranquiliser Valium. Ken, 'who prefers to keep his consciousness clear' refuses the tranquilisers but the 'heavy brigade' (as Ken calls the 'sister') are brought in to administer an injection against his wishes. ...read more.


She wanted an assurance that her husband would not be prosecuted if he assisted her to commit suicide. Her legal representative in the case at the High Court said, 'The terrible irony of this case is that the very disease which causes her suffering prevents her from taking her life unaided'. Just as in Ken's case, she wanted to control how and when she died, sparing her the suffering and indignity she would otherwise endure. The different outcomes of the two cases show the controversy and mental anguish that exists. It seems that the medical profession could accept that preserving life is not the ultimate answer, after all they already take decisions on whether to switch off life-support machines. However, until laws are changed the legal profession will always class assisted suicide as murder even in the most pitiable of circumstances.HHhhas ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    Ken wants to focus his interests on other people's lives to take away the focus from his. Ken makes it humorous by using sarcasm and creating vivid pictures in people's minds of a glamorous life that he once could have had.

  2. Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own ...

    He can feel the drugs but the doctors cannot. He is like an object which is experimented on all the time. A successful experiment would mark a grand step of achievement in the medical field. The doctors feel proud of themselves and their successes.

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    Mrs. Boyle has just told Ken that her scientists can help him to operate a reading machine. This is Ken's reply: "Can I make a request for the first book? "How to sculpt with no hands." And -: "I really have absolutely not desire at all to be the object of scientific virtuosity."

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    I think these arguments are weaker and stronger than the rest of the arguments because the stronger arguments are based on medics, science and technology or religious morals and this provides a very strong argument both for and against. However the weaker arguments are not based on medical ethics or

  1. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    Have me on the floor". Humor is injected into the whole play, sometimes serving to break up some of the most serious parts, like in the courtroom scene: "Judge: There also has to be absolutely no brain activity at all.

  2. How does Brian Clark interest and entertain his Audience in the play 'Whose Life ...

    A doctor's job is to save lives but not at the expense of someone's future and happiness. Anybody can refuse treatment, which could cause them to die so why not make it easier and painless for them. This play is based around this issue for instance, should someone with such

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    'Ken: I want to be discharged so that I can die' At this Dr.Emerson take a professional stand and gets Ken sectioned. Dr.Emerson made sure that his examination was fixed so that he would be sectioned regardless. 'Dr.Emerson: Get someone who sides with us to examine him' This creates tension

  2. Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his ...

    the medical establishment and more specifically Dr. Emerson. Brian Clark uses the physical space on the stage to dramatise this debate. Ken is at the centre of the debate or more accurately Ken's life is at the centre of the debate, and the decision of whether he should have the choice over whether he lives or dies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work