• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is there something rather than nothing?

Extracts from this document...


Div Task by M.Holland 1. Why is there something rather than nothing? I and every other human do not know why there is something rather than nothing, or if the question is even meaningful. If this question has a short answer, it must consist in a self-explaining fact or a cycle of facts. A candidate for such a fact would be the concept of God in the Ontological Proof (A verbal definition of the conception is something the non-existence of which is impossible), but that proof is not convincing. Humans do not know any such facts, or even if they could possibly exist. If it is asserted that non-existence is more likely or natural than existence, one could ask why this asserted tendency (toward non-existence) itself exists. A possibly meaningful (but not at all simple) answer to the Ultimate Why is that the universe exists (more precisely, is perceived to exist) roughly because it is possible. The reasoning would be as follows. ...read more.


I doubt that it is actually possible to produce a completely perfect representation of anything happening in our world no matter how close we can make the representation. An example of this would be if an apple fell from a tree (this has nothing much to do with Newton) through the air to the ground, there would be resistance to its path, whether it is air resistance or something else. This resistance is directly proportional to the velocity of the falling apple. Unfortunately we do not have any kind of number or any indication to how proportional the speed is to the air resistance thus the laws of physics are mathematical models that are used to roughly show what happens in our world. 3.What is the nature of mathematical objects? Mathematical objects are abstract objects in that we can put them into a position and reason about their properties and derivative objects, unencumbered by the necessity of their having any physical attributes. Generally a mathematical theory has an intended interpretation that guides the development of the theory, and as such is necessary to an understanding of the theory and its intended mathematical objects. ...read more.


be possible, we are limited by our scientific advancements and knowledge thus making a disembodied mind a physical problem rather than a mental one. 5. What do you understand by the expression a physical object? The physical object, which he (Kant) calls the 'thing in itself', he regards as essentially unknowable; what can be known is the object as we have it in experience, which he (Kant) calls the 'phenomenon'. The phenomenon, being a joint product of us and the thing in itself, is sure to have those characteristics which are due to us, and is therefore sure to conform to our a priori (not based on prior study or examination; non-analytic) knowledge. Hence this knowledge, though true of all actual and possible experience, must not be supposed to apply outside experience. Thus in spite of the existence of a priori knowledge, we cannot know anything about the thing in itself or about what is not an actual or possible object of experience. In this way he tries to reconcile and harmonize the contentions of the rationalists with the arguments of the empiricists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Supporters of the principle have compared nature to a machine and like all good machines it requires a designer. Kant argued that the design argument relied on the concept that there was design, regularity, order and purpose in the universe as a result of a designer, who imposed order on to everything.

  2. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    If the Toronto Blessing tells us anything about God for Wiles - it would be that God is partisan and favours some people over others. Similarly , Peter Cole, in his book "Philosophy of religion", believes that acts of God such as the 'miraculous healing' at Lourdes are incompatible with

  1. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    Obviously no one had, and realising the obvious, the class went quiet. Within the borders and the limits of the classroom, we knew something that we were not able to prove true. Arguments like these happen every day all around the world.

  2. Preliminary Interpretation of Descartes Meditations

    I would thereby cease to exist at all" "I think, therefore I am" or "I am thinking, therefore I am" this is the first thing Descartes is sure of and is referred to as the cogito from the Latin form of the expression, 'Cogito ergo sum'.

  1. 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

    I could have made a mistake and seeing a man inside Joes house, made the false assumption that it was he, through mistaken perception. This would therefore mean that I have achieved a wrong proof, but it is still a proof to me; and, I know that Joe is inside

  2. Investigating Towers of Hanoi Mathematics coursework

    Modern science demolishes prejudice and discloses a very important and revealing reality. In the following pages, we will try to clarify this great reality to which the Qur'an points.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work