• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Would removing life support from an individual in a permanently vegetative state be morally wrong? Discuss with reference to: a) the sanctity of life and b) the doctrine of double effect.

Extracts from this document...


Would removing life support from an individual in a permanently vegetative state be morally wrong? Discuss with reference to: a) the sanctity of life and b) the doctrine of double effect. Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, has been strongly looked upon by many philosophers over a very long period of time, the word euthanasia means: "The bringing about of a quiet and easy death for the sake of the individual." In simpler terms, subject 'A' kills subject 'B' for the sake of subject 'B'. Autonomy looks at whether or not we should have complete control of our death. Some religions also look into this: There are many different views on whether or not euthanasia is acceptable and the Christian view of Euthanasia is that it is wrong. They understand the pain and emotional suffering, caused in the case of terminally ill, but believe that a hospice is a better solution and that to commit Euthanasia is murder and a degrading act upon human life. ...read more.


is to be given equal respect and treated as 'sacred' (special)." Most religions believe humans are special. For instance, they teach that we have a soul (a part of us that lives forever, even after death), and that we have been given an opportunity to have a relationship with God. Some religions, such as Christianity, also teach that humans have been created in 'Gods image'. This means that humans have certain qualities and characteristics that God has as well. The argument is at first seemingly pointless because it rests upon the assumption that we believe in God, however regardless of this, the argument still works because life is valuable. The argument is still more difficult to hold without religious belief but we would still say that life was valuable even if we had never heard of God. I can prove this point because 'atheists' still value life. (An atheist does not believe in any god or religion.) ...read more.


This argument can be used with many arguments such as legalization. The legalization of cannabis is often looked upon however if it was legal then wouldn't more harmful drugs become closer and closer to legalization? The argument seems to fall down a slippery slope and others follow. I can link this argument with euthanasia, if voluntary active euthanasia is allowed, then people would argue why involuntary passive euthanasia is not acceptable. This could lead to a knock-on effect, which could of started from a small event taking place leading to anything whatsoever. I believe that removing life from a person in a PVS is acceptable on the grounds that it is authorized with doctors and known to be 100% true that the patient will not recover from the vegetative state he or she is in. I also believe that letting the patient die is equally acceptable as to killing the patient with a lethal drug, letting somebody die is just as bad as killing someone in most cases. ?? ?? ?? ?? 3 Chris Acton ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    Ken believes a doctor treats a "customer" differently from the way a sculptor treats his "customer". He thinks the difference is the right to choose. Doctor's do not really give the right to choose. They tell you what you need, why you need it and when.

  2. The belief regarding the sanctity of life means that our lives are very precious ...

    should be disposed of, abruptly rather than allowing it to deteriorate gradually. This logic is completely alien to Islam. Values take priority over price. The care for the weak, old and helpless is a value in itself for which people are willing to sacrifice time, effort and money, and this

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    study such as the Dr Kevorkian case and the Diane Pretty case which are two case which involve Euthanasia, however one being of a Doctor who carries out Euthanasia, and another of a woman suffering from a terminal illness who wants her husband to be allowed to help her die and her winning this battle in court.

  2. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    Aesthetic experience, sociability (friendship), practical reasonableness (application of intelligence), 'religion' (by which he means that which binds us together in collaboration and community). Finnis makes clear that these are not moral goods, but goods, which constitute to a valuable life.

  1. Euthanasia - Right or Wrong?

    Muslims believe that Allah will not allow the victim into paradise, and Jewish believe that even if one is mentally fit to make that choice, they are still going against the Jewish moral codes. They believe that one should not speed up the process of death.

  2. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    The existence of this legislation offends their customary law and traditional beliefs and rituals surrounding death. It is also likely to deter Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory from using health services because of fears that they will be killed without their consent.

  1. Is Euthanasia morally acceptable?

    The information on this article is likely to be trustworthy because they have a .org domain name the definition of which being a non-profit making organisation but since anyone can buy this name so it may not be trustworthy. Also the date updated is 2006 so the information may not be very recent but yet more recent than some things.

  2. Euthanasia is a loving, Christian response Discuss.

    So, is active euthanasia really a loving, Christian response? That's just another think to take into account. That brings me onto my next point: why should you have to pay someone to take your life away? Your life should not have a price put on it, because life is precious,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work