• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Writing to Argue- Should the death penalty be reinstated?

Extracts from this document...


Writing to Argue- Should the death penalty be reinstated? Last week America executed their 1000th person. Should we view this as a momentous occasion or a travesty in American history? The bible states "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" but surely murder is not the answer in the 21st Century? The death penalty is barbaric, primitive and inhumane. When the word death penalty is used, it makes yelling and screaming from both sides of extremist. One side may say deterrence and the other side may say, but you can execute an innocent man. Those who want the death penalty reinstated say that it can reduce the crime rate in the UK. For example it will deter people from committing more crimes. ...read more.


Families and the general public who have lost a love one by a murderer would want to seek revenge by putting them on the death penalty. If a criminal has murdered a 5 year old girl, why shouldn't the criminal die for his misdeed? In contrast, what would it accomplish if putting someone on the death penalty? The victim is already dead, there's no way you can bring he or she back. If putting a criminal on the death row, you are killing someone who has already killed; in the end the criminal will be the victim and you are going to end up being the murderer. ...read more.


Even though a person had murdered someone, where we as a community get off killing someone? God made our lives, and he should be the only one to take it away from us. In conclusion, the death penalty is one of the most debatable in the criminal justice system. There are many advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty. In my opinion I think the death penalty should not be reinstated because there's always a chance of killing the innocence. If putting the guilty on the death penalty, what exactly would it accomplish? It will accomplish the criminal being the victim and you being the perpetrator. You are doing the same deed the criminal had done. And I agree, God made our lives and he should be the only one to take it away from us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty Opinion.

    It is a fair trade-off to execute murderers on the chance that innocent lives will thereby be saved. If we only save one precious life, capital punishment is justified. Why should we think that a life for a life is apt?

  2. Compare and contrast the themes of death in Everyman and Morality Play

    In "Morality Play" it is conveyed that although someone can be corrupted, they can still be a good person. Both morals relate to religious themes of the play and novel as they convey how God is forgiving of peoples sins and this is why we see both protagonists attempt to

  1. Do you believe that the death penalty should be re-instated in Great Britain?

    This to me does not seem like an easy, pain free experience. Any form of execution is inhumane. All methods can be painful and have their own unpleasant kind. If we save the innocent from the criminals, capital punishment is necessary.

  2. The Death Penalty - Is it Barbaric? or Justice?

    Many people claim that in this case justice was done. But how so? The families of the two young girls must forever live with the thought that their children suffered a brutal and horrific death. The fathers will now never see that ultimate dream of walking them up the aisle.

  1. Death Penalty

    result of the Act, the death penalty may now be imposed for nearly sixty federal crimes. New capital offences include the murder of a federal prisoner saving a life sentence, and drive by shootings in the course of certain drug offences" One place that can be used as an example is the U.S.A.

  2. Should the death penalty be used lawfully in civilised society

    Retentionists are the people who have the 'eye for an eye' principle, and feel that execution would be the only way to make the public happy, as well as themselves. For example who doesn't enjoy it when, for example, someone steals money from you, and then the person who stole

  1. How might the death penalty prevent crime?

    From this we could conclude that death penalty shouldn't have any deterrent effect on criminals that commit crimes-of-passion and shouldn't recede number of murders by intimates. Contrary to this belief, although murders by intimates and crime-of-passion murders may be less premeditated than other murders, they are nonetheless deterred by capital punishment.

  2. Is an eye for an eye a legal remedy in the 21st century?

    Punishment is defined as a penalty imposed by the state on an offender who has committed a crime. The main aims of punishment are retribution, deterrence and reform and these have been so since Hammurabi's time.vi Death has been a form of punishment since the earliest times and evidence provides that it was the first form of punishment used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work