• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"You can't be a scientist and be religious".

Extracts from this document...


Section B "You can't be a scientist and be religious". A scientist is someone who studies science. Science is based primly on fact. Religion is based on what people believe. I disagree with the statement. Take Isaac Newton for example, he was a scientist but very religious. He observed his own thumbprint in detail, realising how intricate and perfectly designed it was. He realised something like this could not have happened by accident. He said that there must have been a designer...a creator...that someone been 'God'. Also, the medical scientist, 'Paracelsus' was very religious. He believed God had given people secret messages as to how the world worked. ...read more.


Religion claims that the invisible force, which does this, is God. Scientists test theories by experimenting, i.e. 'the big bang theory'. Religion uses experiments to tests the effect on people's lives. For e.g., when people are buried, religious people used to say that the whole body went to either heaven or hell, but as people began to question this, and ultimately, dig up graves, they realised that the bodies weren't moving, simply rotting. Therefore, a new belief came to light, that the spirit went to either heaven or hell. As graveyards began to get full, the idea of cremation was considered, before, the idea had not been accepted and was merely frowned upon, but suddenly, it was 'ok' to cremate people's bodies. ...read more.


Religious people would disagree with the statement "you can't be a scientist and be religious". All 6-world religions already see scientists as following religion. This is probably because they understand that science is just another way of explaining the same facts. Religious people understand there is often question marks in s. These question marks sometimes have to be filled by religion. I think you can be both, because for one, there are so many links and connections between science and religion and religion often fills gaps science cannot. I see no reason why people cannot be both, if they understand and respect aspects of both. Reasons why people could not be both is the fact that religion can often be seen as contradicting science, so on a larger scale, you would be seen ultimately as contradicting yourself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Religion in the Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Religion in the Media essays

  1. Discuss the merits of theories of secularisation with regard to religion in modern Britain

    In effect, in pre-industrial societies, the Church is viewed as being pre-eminent in terms of its ability to organise and control knowledge - not only in relation to such ideas as socialisation and education, but also in terms of

  2. Religion is simply a brain-washing control device to make individuals behave in the way ...

    For my open questions I mainly got the responses I guessed I would. When I asked 'Do you think religion can be beneficial to the individual's life-style? (Can it make life easier/happier?) Why?' answers which appeared often included: *it gives meaning to life *offers reward of afterlife *promotes good messages

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work