• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'You cannot be a Scientist & also Religious'. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Some people would say that Science and Religion are wholly incompatible, and it is impossible to be both scientific and religious. They would argue that, by its definition, Science should be able to explain everything that happens in the universe, and that if we find something that we can't explain, it does not mean it's a religious occurrence, but rather just something we do not understand yet. They'd say that science is seen wholly on physical things, the idea that there is non-physical matter in the universe is just not an option. Some might say that everything we perceive to be spiritual, such as life and mind, are somehow just flukes in the engineering of the universe, and should just be treated as tricks. People who believe that Science and Religion are incompatible might also point out places in Holy Books that they believe completely contradict scientific belief, such as the question of how the universe was created. ...read more.

Middle

However, there are many people that believe you can be both a Scientist and also religious, as long as you agree that some things in religion might rather than be a hard statement, but are actually a metaphor. For example, the Creation Story might be just something to show that God does have a part in our world, and is actually real, but rather than saying that, this story puts it across in an easy, accessible way. They might also argue that even with theories such as the Big Bang, surely there has to be something to start it off in the first place? Both Science and Religion agree the Universe had a beginning, so God therefore could've just set the Universe's development rolling. Others would also argue that while Evolution at first might seem to disprove Religion, it is possible that we were specifically built by God to have this quality. ...read more.

Conclusion

They'd argue that they don't have to conflict, because they are dealing with a different side of life. It also says that fundamentalism from both sides however cannot get on, but if you are smart enough to realise they are both essential, then you can be a Scientist and Religious. However I believe that as long as you do not take everything too literally, then you can in fact be both Scientific and religious. I think that it is important to understand that we do not understand everything in the world, and the likelihood is that we never will, so for at least some things we need to have faith. As long as we give both sides are fair and reasoned analysis, I do believe that you can be both a Scientist and Religious. ?? ?? ?? ?? 'You cannot be a Scientist & also Religious' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Individual religious experience means individual religious fantasy; corporate religious experience means corporate religious fantasy; ...

    To confirm what any subject is experiencing there must be "checkable" statements. This is similar to a blind person, confirming what a sighted person sees. With the religious experiences there are no such "checkable" statements, so there can be no confirmation.

  2. a1 a2 a3 and part b religious coursework

    There are many laws of science which seems to keep the universe in existence and creates boundaries. Without these laws the universe would be in chaos. Also things such as DNA is too beautiful and complicated to be just an accidental design, as it needs an all-knowing designer.

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    He goes on to explain that the experience of a second movement of Beethoven's seventh symphony is both 'tragic and joyous' and his contradictory description also applies to mystical experiences which mystics often describe as being 'passive and active, personal and impersonal, full and empty, etc.'

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    Ayer's Language, Truth and Logic of 1936. Its most famous spokesmen were Rudolf Carnap and Moritz Schlick. Religions like Christianity, Judaism and Islam, for example, in some sense assume some sort of 'factual' character in their belief assertions. Logical Positivism developed a criterion by which to distinguish the factual from the non-factual.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work