• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'You cannot be a Scientist & also Religious'. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Some people would say that Science and Religion are wholly incompatible, and it is impossible to be both scientific and religious. They would argue that, by its definition, Science should be able to explain everything that happens in the universe, and that if we find something that we can't explain, it does not mean it's a religious occurrence, but rather just something we do not understand yet. They'd say that science is seen wholly on physical things, the idea that there is non-physical matter in the universe is just not an option. Some might say that everything we perceive to be spiritual, such as life and mind, are somehow just flukes in the engineering of the universe, and should just be treated as tricks. People who believe that Science and Religion are incompatible might also point out places in Holy Books that they believe completely contradict scientific belief, such as the question of how the universe was created. ...read more.


However, there are many people that believe you can be both a Scientist and also religious, as long as you agree that some things in religion might rather than be a hard statement, but are actually a metaphor. For example, the Creation Story might be just something to show that God does have a part in our world, and is actually real, but rather than saying that, this story puts it across in an easy, accessible way. They might also argue that even with theories such as the Big Bang, surely there has to be something to start it off in the first place? Both Science and Religion agree the Universe had a beginning, so God therefore could've just set the Universe's development rolling. Others would also argue that while Evolution at first might seem to disprove Religion, it is possible that we were specifically built by God to have this quality. ...read more.


They'd argue that they don't have to conflict, because they are dealing with a different side of life. It also says that fundamentalism from both sides however cannot get on, but if you are smart enough to realise they are both essential, then you can be a Scientist and Religious. However I believe that as long as you do not take everything too literally, then you can in fact be both Scientific and religious. I think that it is important to understand that we do not understand everything in the world, and the likelihood is that we never will, so for at least some things we need to have faith. As long as we give both sides are fair and reasoned analysis, I do believe that you can be both a Scientist and Religious. ?? ?? ?? ?? 'You cannot be a Scientist & also Religious' ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    an experience with no profound meaning that relates to an omnipotent presence. This is similar to Swinburne's principle of credulity; "unless there is some special reason for doubt, we should accept that how things seem to be is good grounds for belief about how things are."

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    would provide us with a sufficient reason for admitting that propositions like 'God loves us' or 'God exists' are false. Instead the believer qualifies or weakens the claim by adding that God's love is inscrutable or mysterious. Is the original assertion, then, still meaningful, or has it "died the death of a thousand qualifications"?

  1. Individual religious experience means individual religious fantasy; corporate religious experience means corporate religious fantasy; ...

    it is this knowledge and his emotion that constitutes that truly religious attitude". What Einstein said was closer to what Otto called the numinous, "Otto describes the central 'feeling' of the Mystical experience as a kind of "creature-feeling". The Holy or numinous experience, an experience of a wholly other which evokes boundless awe & wonder & which entrances & captivates.

  2. God does not play dice, discuss.

    "The ozone gas layer is a mighty proof of the creator's forethought. Could anyone attribute this device to a chance evolutionary process? A wall which prevents death to every living thing, just the right thickness and exactly the correct defence gives evidence of a plan" Hence the sheer complexities and

  1. a1 a2 a3 and part b religious coursework

    It also mentioned that he then separated night from day and brought forth the waters of the water, which created vegetation. Allah then made the birds; fish and animals of the earth, but most importantly, Allah (God) moulded the first man (Adam)

  2. I am going to be looking at how the religion of Hinduism relates to ...

    According to the big bang, the universe was created sometime between 10 billion and 20 billion years ago from a cosmic explosion that hurled matter and in all directions. In 1927, the Belgian priest Georges Lema�tre was the first to propose that the universe began with the explosion of a primeval atom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work