• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A-Level Physics Investigation:The Ski Jumper

Extracts from this document...


A-Level Physics Investigation: The Ski Jumper Aim To find out how the starting position of a ski jumper affects the horizontal distance travelled in the jump. We will model the jumper and the ski slope as a ball bearing and a curtain rail. We will not take air resistance, friction and other various type of energy lost into account. However in practical we have to keep in mind that they do exist and causes variation in our results. Factors which affects the range: Changing the vertical height of drop from the slope ('h') would vary the range. This is because according to the law of conservation of energy, it cannot be made or destroyed but transferred. To apply this law into this practical, we can say all of the GPE (Gravitational Potential Energy) is converted into KE (Kinetic Energy) assuming no energy is wasted. As a result, GPE is equal to KE. Hence if mass (kg) and acceleration (ms-2) due to gravity remains constant, varying the height (metres) would directly affect the velocity (ms-1). mgh = 1/2 mv2 So we are saying GPE lost causes a gain in KE. Ultimately, the greater the height dropped the greater the velocity it has when leaving the ramp and consequently greater the range. With this theory, we can confidently say that changing the gradient would not make a difference to the range if the height remains constant. ...read more.


First we have to set-up the apparatus as above. We will need to measure the height of the table from the ground and the height of the slope from the table. By adding the height of the slope from the table to the height of the table from the floor, we could find out the overall drop height mentioned earlier on. The value I obtained for the height of the table was 0.93m from our preliminary test. 2. After getting the apparatus ready, we will start the experiment right away. We will be dropping various heights on the slope, from 5cm to 40cm with 5cm intervals. To do this, we hold the ball according to the height on the rail and release it. It will then travel down and into the sand tray leaving a mark similar to half a sphere. I will be repeating each drop three times and then taking an average to ensure accuracy. 3. We will measure from the centre of the mark to the end of the sand tray closer to the edge of the table. By adding this value we obtain with 15cm, we will acquire the final value of the range. Experimental errors and Uncertainties There are superficial errors with the ruler I will be using. The edge of the ruler I will be using is not 0cm. The 0cm indictor is actually 0.3 cm from the edge. ...read more.


To resolve this problem, I have to check whether the sand tray is back into its position after impact. As a result, I decide to use carbon paper instead next time when recording the range. Also, when dropping the ball, it will not have been dropped from the exact point every time, as this is virtually impossible. To overcome this problem, some kind of release mechanism would ensure that the ball is dropped from the same point on the slope every time. All of these have virtually no effect on our result or conclusion at all. Instead there is something we could alter that would have assisted us in concluding the formula. For example, a working condition where air resistance is zero. In other words, working in a vacuum environment. As a result, the condition we are working in is more similar to the assumptions we have made using the formula. With common sense, we can expect this condition would yield a greater range. With no air resistance, I can say that our actual range would be greater because the velocity leaving the ramp is getting closer to the calculated value using the idea that potential gravitation energy lost is equal to the kinetic energy gain. Basically, more of the GPE is converted into kinetic energy. As a result when plotting graph2 again with the new conditions, we would expect a steeper gradient or a gradient that is nearly the same as the one we have calculated. Ultimately, it can give us stronger evidence that the formula is spot on, even though the degree accuracy we currently have is sufficient. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Investigating factors that affect the bounce height of a squash ball

    5 star(s)

    height and divided the result by 15 (as this was the number of data that were collected for each). This was then repeated for every release height. I also converted all of the data into metres so that it could form a better graph.

  2. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    The ticker tape and timer will be set up, and then the tape attached to the end of the trolley. 6. The back of the trolley will be in line with the 150cm mark on the runway. 7. The trolley will be released and the power pack started at the same time.

  1. Investigation to Determine how the Height of a slope Affects the Speed of an ...

    I will keep the ways I made sure the marble rolled in a straight line the same because I think it worked. I will also carry on using a marble for my final experiment and set the rest of the apparatus up in the same way I did in the trial experiment.

  2. Squash Ball and Temperature Investigation

    tested at five bounce tests were conducted each so that results could be compared fairly and the height at which the ball was to be dropped was measured accurately (to the nearest centimetre) using a metre rule. Results Height of Bounce (cm)

  1. Physics - how the launch height affects the horizontal distance a ski jumper travels ...

    During our preliminary tests we used two different types of sand we used wet sand and dry sand. We decided to use the wet sand in our finally test because the ball made a clearer crater in the wet sand than it did in the dry sand, so we could make more precise measurements of distance.

  2. Investigating the Physics of Bunjee Jumping

    From experiment 1 and 2: From experiment 1, it was found that the minimum extension of a mass of 300g was 8.4cm. To find out the maximum extension of the elastic cord for the mass of 300g, the mass was dropped from a height.

  1. Investigating the amazingness of theBouncing Ball!

    When the ball hits the surface this exerts a force on these polymer chains stretching them out. The Intermolecular forces between the polymer chains then act against this force to 're-entwine' the polymer chains. So I believe that the hotter the ball the more energy supplied to the polymer chains,

  2. Strength of a string practical investigation

    Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Average extension (m) Force (F=ma) Stress (F/A) Strain (E/L) 0.5 0 0 0 0.00E+00 4.9 4.34E+06 0.00E+00 1 0.001 0.001 0.001 1.00E-03 9.8 8.67E+06 1.54E-03 1.5 0.002 0.001 0.001 1.33E-03 14.7 1.30E+07 2.05E-03 2 0.002 0.002 0.002 2.00E-03 19.6 1.73E+07 3.08E-03 2.5 0.003 0.002 0.002 2.33E-03 24.5 2.17E+07 3.59E-03 3 0.003 0.002 0.003

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work