• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Acceleration of falling cones Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ann Hitchcock 10DJG 10YH Acceleration of falling cones Investigation Planning:- Safety Statement:- To make this investigation safe I will wear sensible shoes, this make sure that I will not fall or trip on the table whilst carrying out the investigation. Prediction:- I predict that the smaller the surface area of the cone the faster it will fall. I know this as the more surface area the cone has the more air resistance there is. I also know this as when I carried out some research on parachutes, I discovered, that the larger the parachute the quicker the forces balanced, making the parachute fall slowly. Also, the smaller the parachute the longer it took for the forces to balance out, making the parachute fall much quicker. When I looked at a person freefalling (standing up) the results were that this also took at long time for the forces to balance out. When I saw the results of a person lying down I could see that the forced balanced out quickly, making the person fall slower. I know that it doesn't matter what weight an object has, it falls at the same acceleration, and lands on the ground at the same time. ...read more.

Middle

I will also make sure that I move the piece of card forming the cone around 20? each time, making the surface area of the cone decrease in regular intervals. Obtaining:- Results:- Angle (degrees?) Surface Area (cm) Time (seconds) 1st Time (seconds) 2nd Time (seconds) 3rd Average Time (seconds) Velocity (m/s) 20 297 1.35 1.57 1.44 1.45 1.38 40 279 1.31 1.40 1.50 1.40 1.42 60 262 1.22 1.34 1.19 1.25 1.60 80 244 1.10 1.28 1.19 1.19 1.68 100 227 1.04 1.19 1.12 1.11 1.80 120 209 1.06 0.94 1.03 1.01 1.98 140 192 0.87 0.84 1.00 0.90 2.22 160 174 0.78 0.75 0.91 0.81 2.47 180 157 0.72 0.88 0.72 0.77 2.60 Analysis:- My results show that the bigger the surface area of the cone the slower the cone would fall. This was due to the forces balancing out quicker. The smaller the surface area the quicker the cone would fall, it therefore takes longer for the forces to balance out, causing it to have a higher velocity. Looking at the graph above you can see that it did take longer for the cone to fall with a larger surface area. ...read more.

Conclusion

As well as having more data if this experiment was done again I would extend the experiment to involve weight. I would then try to prove that the weight of the cone would not affect the velocity and time of the cone falling. This would help me determine whether or not I was right about weight not being a factor of affecting the time and velocity. If I was to do this then this would be my experiment then this would be what I would do:- Prediction:- I predict that the weight would not make an impact on the time it takes for the cone to fall, and it's velocity. Equipment:- Plastacine Stopwatch, Metre rule, Piece of card with cone and angles drawn on it. This time the variable I would change would be the weight of the cone. Method:- I would drop the cone with a ball of plastercine in it from a height of 2m. Each time I drop it I would change the weight of the plastercine, repeating this three times each for each different weight, this way I could get an average of the times, making it even more accurate. Acceleration and terminal velocity of falling cones. By Ann Hitchcock 10DJG 10YH ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Galilio's falling bodies

    Next drop the weight and let it fall to the ground and onto the carpet, making sure it does not land on your feet. The weights will have pulled the ticker tape through the ticker timer, which would of marked the tape, cut the ticker timer paper where the first

  2. Factors affecting the terminal velocity of a falling cone

    0.63 0.67 0.74 0.68 2.94 10 0.61 0.68 0.69 0.66 3.03 Conclusion My results support the prediction that as the number of holes increased the speed of the cone would also increase, due to reduced air resistance. This is because as every hole was added the air resistance became lower,

  1. Investigating the amazingness of theBouncing Ball!

    against time graph on the picoscope programme on the laptop.The The Dr Daq system will be stopped after each experiment when a good number of sound readings have been produced. Then using my cusor and lining up a line at the very beging of each peak, the computer will calculate the time difference between each bounce.

  2. Designing a children's slide, making it exciting for the children whilst exercising safety.

    The material of clothing will have an affect on the co-efficient of friction, which varies with the type of material. This will in turn affect the acceleration of which the child travels down the slide. So a constant ? value will be used through this investigation.

  1. Investigate a factor that might affect the size of a crater made by a ...

    and awkward, therefore clamp stands will be used to clamp two meter rules in place eliminating the need for someone to hold the rule and ensuring more accurate results. There were various ways of measuring the dependent variable which is the crater made by the object, but using plaster-a-paris was

  2. Factors affecting acceleration

    very little difference between each weight would suggest that the difference in the mass of the car will not affect the acceleration of it this is also shown as the times of the accelerations were all in a range of 0.5m.s.

  1. Practical Investigation Into Viscosity

    The results of the experiments are as follows: Ball bearing Time taken (s) to descend 1 metre through water 1 2 3 Average Very small 1.92 1.96 1.94 1.940 Small 1.39 1.42 1.38 1.397 Medium 0.29 1.28 1.28 0.950 Large 1.27 1.30 1.29 1.287 Very large 1.64 1.62 1.63 1.630

  2. Squash Ball and Temperature Investigation

    26 27 131 131 ( 5 26 100 28 28 28 29 29 142 142 ( 5 28 Having looked at the results and discussed them with my partner, we initially thought that the best height to test from would be from the height of 70cm as it had the least inaccuracies (based on the range)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work