• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Acceleration of falling cones Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ann Hitchcock 10DJG 10YH Acceleration of falling cones Investigation Planning:- Safety Statement:- To make this investigation safe I will wear sensible shoes, this make sure that I will not fall or trip on the table whilst carrying out the investigation. Prediction:- I predict that the smaller the surface area of the cone the faster it will fall. I know this as the more surface area the cone has the more air resistance there is. I also know this as when I carried out some research on parachutes, I discovered, that the larger the parachute the quicker the forces balanced, making the parachute fall slowly. Also, the smaller the parachute the longer it took for the forces to balance out, making the parachute fall much quicker. When I looked at a person freefalling (standing up) the results were that this also took at long time for the forces to balance out. When I saw the results of a person lying down I could see that the forced balanced out quickly, making the person fall slower. I know that it doesn't matter what weight an object has, it falls at the same acceleration, and lands on the ground at the same time. ...read more.

Middle

I will also make sure that I move the piece of card forming the cone around 20? each time, making the surface area of the cone decrease in regular intervals. Obtaining:- Results:- Angle (degrees?) Surface Area (cm) Time (seconds) 1st Time (seconds) 2nd Time (seconds) 3rd Average Time (seconds) Velocity (m/s) 20 297 1.35 1.57 1.44 1.45 1.38 40 279 1.31 1.40 1.50 1.40 1.42 60 262 1.22 1.34 1.19 1.25 1.60 80 244 1.10 1.28 1.19 1.19 1.68 100 227 1.04 1.19 1.12 1.11 1.80 120 209 1.06 0.94 1.03 1.01 1.98 140 192 0.87 0.84 1.00 0.90 2.22 160 174 0.78 0.75 0.91 0.81 2.47 180 157 0.72 0.88 0.72 0.77 2.60 Analysis:- My results show that the bigger the surface area of the cone the slower the cone would fall. This was due to the forces balancing out quicker. The smaller the surface area the quicker the cone would fall, it therefore takes longer for the forces to balance out, causing it to have a higher velocity. Looking at the graph above you can see that it did take longer for the cone to fall with a larger surface area. ...read more.

Conclusion

As well as having more data if this experiment was done again I would extend the experiment to involve weight. I would then try to prove that the weight of the cone would not affect the velocity and time of the cone falling. This would help me determine whether or not I was right about weight not being a factor of affecting the time and velocity. If I was to do this then this would be my experiment then this would be what I would do:- Prediction:- I predict that the weight would not make an impact on the time it takes for the cone to fall, and it's velocity. Equipment:- Plastacine Stopwatch, Metre rule, Piece of card with cone and angles drawn on it. This time the variable I would change would be the weight of the cone. Method:- I would drop the cone with a ball of plastercine in it from a height of 2m. Each time I drop it I would change the weight of the plastercine, repeating this three times each for each different weight, this way I could get an average of the times, making it even more accurate. Acceleration and terminal velocity of falling cones. By Ann Hitchcock 10DJG 10YH ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Factors affecting acceleration

    is 2.70m.s.-2 , and for a 30� angle it is 3.24m.s.-2 etc. As the mass of the car does not affect the acceleration, all the accelerations should be the same. Results Weight 1st (Sec.) 2nd (Sec.) 3rd (Sec.) 0g 1.56 1.64 1.59 50g 1.62 1.39 1.23 100g 1.36 1.59 1.48

  2. Practical Investigation Into Viscosity

    Time taken(s) for ball bearing to pass through distance measured 1 2 3 Average 0-20 1.89 1.86 1.88 1.877 10-30. 1.83 1.77 1.80 1.800 20-40 1.76 1.75 1.78 1.763 30-50 1.76 1.79 1.77 1.773 40-60 1.77 1.78 1.77 1.773 Small Distance Timed (cm)

  1. Squash Ball and Temperature Investigation

    5 28 75 28 28 28 28 28 140 140 ? 5 28 90 28 29 28 27 28 140 140 ? 5 28 From the results, it is evident that at 60 seconds the height of the balls bounce remains constant after the ball has been heated.

  2. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    losing their energy on the surface of the ramp - but this effect is only very slight. If we were to conduct this experiment in a place with no air resistance and no friction, we would see that the speed of the trolley stayed perfectly constant as mass plays no

  1. Investigating the amazingness of theBouncing Ball!

    The metal wieght will keep the ball under water so that successful temperature change is achieved, the weight will also have to be metal, as metal is a ver.y good thermal conductor, transferring as much heat as possible to the rubber ball from the water bath.

  2. "Oh My Elbow - Investigation Into Force Applied To Elbow Joint".

    EXPR Two Angle to Vertical (�) Force on Spring Balance (N) 0 0 3 � 16.7 % 7.55 � 0.7 % 5 � 10.0 % 9.1 � 0.6 % 11 � 4.5 % 8.1 � 0.6 % 20 � 2.5 % 8.95 � 0.6 % 41.5 � 1.2 % 9.5

  1. Paper parachute investigation - Investigating the relationships between the sizes of the cones, the ...

    We measured accurately the two heights at which we would be dropping the 6 cm diameter cone (from 4.48m and 2.72m) using a long piece of string and a meter ruler. The cone was dropped 3 times from both heights and averages were taken for greater accuracy.

  2. Galilio's falling bodies

    fairer than the preliminary test by using a ticker timer this will enable me to get more accurate readings and there is no room for human in accurate timing as the number of dots on the ticker tape show how long it took for the weight to hit the ground.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work