• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An Investigation Into the Effect of Wave Exposure on the Volume of Limpets

Extracts from this document...


An Investigation Into the Effect of Wave Exposure on the Volume of Limpets


The aim of this investigation was to explore the effect of wave exposure on the volumes of intertidal limpets.  Samples of the Patella spp. were measured at 2 different sites at West Angle Bay.  A 0.25m2 quadrat was used to measure along a continuous horizontal belt transect at a fixed vertical height and the base diameter and vertical height of each limpet was measured using callipers.  These measurements were then used to calculate the volumes of each limpet.  The results obtained showed a measurable difference in the volumes obtained at the exposed shore site compared with the sheltered shore site.  The results showed that there was a higher frequency of smaller limpets and a lower frequency of larger limpets at the wave-exposed site than at the sheltered site. Therefore wave exposure has a profound effect on the size distribution of this intertidal limpet species.  The reasons for this are that the effects of wave action are more at the exposed shore site.  As a result of the force of the water’s acceleration increasing at a faster rate than the organisms ability to hold on as an organism grows, wave exposure prevents the distribution of larger limpets.  When limpets are mobile their adhesive tenacity is much less than when they are stationary.  This suggests that due to their reduced tenacity with movement, the Patella spp. may be limited in size by waves at an exposed shore.      


...read more.


2h’ which is the formula to work out the volume of a cone.  After the volume of each limpet in the quadrat was worked out, the quadrat was flipped horizontally in order that the investigation took place along a continuous horizontal belt transect at a fixed vertical height.  The quadrat also ran along the same rock stratum.  This was done because different species of limpet could be found on different types of rock and these species could be bigger or smaller than the Patella spp.  This would affect any trends and patterns found in the volumes of the limpets.  The volume of each limpet was worked out in this quadrat and the quadrat was continuously flipped until a running mean was established.  The running mean was calculated after every volume was worked out until half of the results obtained were 2.5% either side of the mean.  The same apparatus and the same method were used on both shores.  It was important to use the same quadrat size on both shores because a bigger quadrat would mean the horizontal belt transect would be larger and therefore a larger section of the shore would be investigated on one shore compared with the other.  This could provide a greater variation in the limpets and also different species may be included in the results.  This investigation was carried out on two consecutive days at the same time in the day, with similar weather conditions observed on both days.
...read more.



In order to see if the results obtained are statistically significant, the value of t must be compared with the table of t values (Appendix 3).  The p values at the bottom of this table show the probability that chance alone could produce the difference between the two sets of data.  The p-value used here is 0.05.  The degrees of freedom for this investigation lies between 120 and ∞, which give the critical values of 1.980 and 1.960 respectively.  The t value obtained was 14.8 and is clearly bigger than the critical value for the degrees of freedom.  This means that I can be 95% confident that the difference between the means is significant and therefore the results are statistically significant. This strong probability shows that the null hypothesis has been falsified by the data.  Therefore the null hypothesis can be rejected and the alternative hypothesis accepted.

The statistical test has shown that this hypothesis is correct:

There will be a statistically significant change in the volumes of limpets found on an exposed shore compared with a sheltered shore.

This hypothesis can be rejected:

There will be no statistically significant change in the volumes of limpets found on an exposed shore compared with a sheltered shore.


BRANCH, G. M. 1986. Limpets: their role in littoral and sublittoral community dynamics. Pp. 97-113. In: P. G. Moore & R. Seed (eds.), The Ecology of Rocky Coasts: Essays Presented to J. R. Lewis. Columbia Press: New York.

Todgham A, Boulding E, Megill WM 1997.  Wave exposure effects on the density, habitat selection and size distribution of intertidal limpets species

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Waves section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Waves essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    An investigation into the factors affecting the frequency of a standing wave

    4 star(s)

    Although you can read off the signal generator what the frequency needed to make the wave is, it is very inaccurate as it only reads off to the nearest Hz. Therefore, I decided to link the signal generator to the cathode ray oscilloscope and use the graph created on the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Are mobile phones dangerous? Research Project.

    3 star(s)

    I think this argument is potentially reliable however there is very little information and evidence crucial to back up this theory. The website is http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1885775.stm and the BBC needs to keep up a trustworthy image to keep the TV ratings high, so it is unlikely that they would publish something that was not remotely reliable.

  1. The aim of my experiment is to see what factors affect electromagnetism the most ...

    Y= ? K= 0.135 X= 30 Y = 0.135 x (30 - 11.5) = 2.4975 The line on the graph tells me that the corresponding gram value to 30 coil wraps is 2.5. They are nearly exactly the same and so proves the part of prediction that said that

  2. There are several ways of sharing information - Statistical information - data.

    Secondly, the classes must be in numerical order or size order. It is also advisable to have an average of 8-10 classes in total. Less than 5 would not provide sufficient information and more than 15 would be too much to comprehend.

  1. Soil water content in relation to species diversity in a Pingoe.

    This would relate to sepsis diversity as plants that require large amounts of water would be better adapted to the environment at the bottom of the pingoe. The water availability is very important for all plants, as it is one of the requirements for photosynthesis.


    Compare these values with those off of the graph obtained from the Pico scope. 2. Obtain an Amplitude Modulated (AM) signal. Apply the signal to a spectrum analyser. Explain the measured results. THEORY Filters: The purpose of a filter is to do as the name suggests.

  1. Electromagnetism Investigation

    I base this prediction on a previous experiment we did where we tested how many paper clips were attracted to the electromagnet. In this experiment I found that the more turns on the coil, the stronger the magnet, the more paper clips were attracted.

  2. Light is so common that we often take it for granted.

    Such sources include the sun and the stars. Artificial light comes from sources that we control. These sources include candles and car lights. How light is produced. All light comes from atoms. It is produced by atoms that have gained energy either by absorbing light from another source or by being struck by other particles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work