• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An investigation to discover how the mass of deposited metal is related to the current that flows through an electrolyte.

Extracts from this document...


Sarah Lee An investigation to discover how the mass of deposited metal is related to the current that flows through an electrolyte An electroplating company needs to know how the mass of deposited metal is related to the current that flows through an electrolyte. I have been asked to investigate... Possible input variables The size of current, metal at the electrode, concentration of solution, surface area exposed to electrolyte and the time exposed the metal is exposed may effect the experiment. Possible output variables If I change any number of the input variables the mass of the metal deposited at the cathode and the mass lost at the anode will be affected. My input variable I have decided to change the current that I pass through the electrolyte. My outcome variable I will need to measure or observe the mass of metal deposited at the cathode. My control variable To make my experiment fair, I will keep the concentration of the solution, metal at the electrodes, surface area of the metal exposed to the electrolyte and the time the metal is exposed the same each time I do the experiment. Scientific knowledge In the electrolysis of copper solution with copper electrodes copper is deposited at the cathode. There are positively charged copper ions in the copper sulphate solution, which are then attracted to the negatively charged cathode and deposited when they combine with +2 electrons. ...read more.


Record in a table the results and plot the average readings on a line graph[N1]. This is a table to show the amount (in grams) of copper deposited on the cathode during electrolysis Trial 1 Current in amps Mass before Mass after Total increase Observations 0.5 2.15 2.17 0.02 The total amount of 1.0 2.17 2.28 0.11 copper is increasing 1.5 2.28 2.46 0.18 2.0 2.41 2.62 0.21 A lot of copper is deposited on the 2.5 2.62 2.82 0.23 bottom 3.0 2.85 3.09 0.24 Pieces of copper are moving slowly towards the edges of the cathode Trial 2 Current in amps Mass before Mass after Total increase Observations 0.5 3.09 3.24 0.15 Copper moves much more slowly 1.0 3.04 3.24 0.2 Not a lot of copper on the surface of the 1.5 3.24 3.41 0.17 cathode 2.0 3.41 3.57 0.16 Lots of copper deposited on the bottom 2.5 3.57 3.82 0.05 3.0 3.82 4.13 0.31 The solution is beginning to get warm Current in amps Total average increase in grams 0.5 0.85 1.0 0.155 1.5 0.175 2.0 0.185 2.5 0.24 3.0 0.275 I am confident with my recorded results because I have taken enough accurate, repeated trials and used the equipment accurately to make reliable evidence of my experiment. I have taken extra observations of my experiment at various stages to improve my experiment results. ...read more.


I also took time to zero the scales so the measurements would be more accurate. I checked the wires to make sure they were covered, I wore goggles throughout the experiment and I washed my hands before and after the experiment. I have made some observations as I was carrying out my experiment, during both trials, excess copper was deposited on the bottom of the flask of solution therefore the results varied greatly between the trials because the amount of copper deposited on the bottom varied between the two experiments. Also obtaining the results for the experiment spanned over a couple of one hour lessons, even though I was very careful when putting the equipment away while putting away the cathode small amounts of deposited copper rubbed off therefore our results do not look quite right. As I have commented before, I feel my results are very accurate as I carried out my experiment methodically and recorded my results in a clear way. We took readings spanning from 0.5 amps to 3.0 amps. At each point I repeated it three times. Because points on my graph show good correlation there isn't an 'odd' point. I took many results, which were repeated, so I am confident that there are enough results to support my conclusion. To improve my experiment I would use, instead of a paper cathode, a small cylinder cathode so I could collected more deposit, which would make better more varied results. Other than that I feel my experiment was successful. [N1] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere essays

  1. Investigation to show how the amount of electric current affects the amount of copper ...

    Even though I tried my hardest to stick to this concept, I do not think it was done accurately enough. The change was extremely minute so I do not think it affected my results much but it is a point on which I could make improvements.

  2. Thermal Decomposition Of Metal Carbonates

    125g 1.25g Carbon 12 Oxygen �3 16�3 Copper CuCO3 Copper 63.5 63.5 + 12+ (16�3) 123.5 g 1.235g Carbon 12 Oxygen �3 16�3 Manganese MnCO3 Manganese 55 55 + 12 + (16�3) 115g 1.15g Carbon 12 Oxygen �3 16�3 Potassium K2CO3 Potassium �2 39 � 2 (39�2)

  1. An experiment to show how electroplating using copper electrodes.

    Therefore the rate is increased. EVALUATION I am very pleased about the results that I have obtained. They are accurate, and they can enable me to prove that the theories in my predictions are correct. There are several points that I think I have done quite well to obtain these results.

  2. Electrolysis - study the effect of current upon the mass of nickel deposited at ...

    There are many areas of error during this experiment that could have affected the accuracy of the results. When you look at my results you should notice that as the current increases the mass of nickel lost at the anode and gained at the cathode increase.

  1. The Electrolysis Of Copper (ii) Sulphate Solution Using Copper Electrodes

    AVERAGE CHANGE IN MASS FROM EXPERIMENT (g) Quantitative electrolysis mass change (g) 0.35 0.035 0.0348 0.6 0.0625 0.0597 0.85 0.875 0.085 1.09 0.105 0.108 1.35 0.1325 0.134 This table clearly shows that the results obtained from the experiment were roughly correct since they are very close to the calculated results.

  2. Investigate the factors that affect the mass of Copper deposited on the Copper Cathode ...

    The variable resistor maintains a low and steady current. The power pack was then turned on for 20 minutes, the time was measured using a stop clock. When 20 minutes is passed the copper cathode is carefully removed from the copper sulphate solution. The cathode should (according to my prediction)

  1. Investigating the factors that affect the amount of copper deposited during the electrolysis of ...

    Current (I) = Charge (Q) / Time (T) Faraday's Constant: 1 mole of electrons have 96,500 coulombs of charge. 1 mole of electrons = 6x1023 Faraday's law therefore means the more charge being passed through the solution, the more copper metal is being deposited at the cathode. At the cathode, this is happening Cu2+ + 2e- --> Cu

  2. Investigating one of the factors that affects the mass of copper deposited when copper ...

    Start the stopwatch and at the same moment switch the power pack back on. Leave for 10 minutes 11. Once the 10 minutes is up turn off the power pack and take the electrodes out of the copper sulphate, disconnecting them from the wires 12.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work