• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An investigation to find out how gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy.

Extracts from this document...


An investigation to find out how gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy.

I will be investigating, how gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. My experiment will involve a trolley, after being released from rest, rolling down a ramp.

(The following abbreviations will be used in this document:

k.e.: Kinetic energy, p.e.: Potential energy.)

At the top of the ramp the trolley has gravitational potential energy, once it is released this energy is converted to kinetic energy when the trolley is moving.

The following theoretical knowledge has been adapted from “Advanced physics” by Tom Duncan.Gravitational potential energy is the energy stored in an object as a result of its vertical position (i.e., height.) The energy is stored as the result of the gravitational attraction of the earth on the object. There is a direct relationship between the potential energy, the mass of the object and also the height of the object. The formula for Gravitational potential energy is:

G.P.E = m × g × h     ( mass (kg) x gravitational field (m.s-2)x height(m) )

In my case I am using the same trolley so the mass is the same, but I am changing the height of the ramp; the higher the trolley is elevated the greater the potential energy is. The gravitational field strength will remain constant.

Kinetic energy is the energy of a body resulting from motion. Kinetic energy depends upon two variables: the mass (m) of the object and the speed (v) of the object. The formula for Kinetic energy is

K.E=½ × m × v2         (½ × mass (kg) ×velocity (m.s-1)  squared)

...read more.



Set-up the equipment as shown in the diagram.

  1. Mark a line at the top and bottom of the ramp to indicate the start and finish lines. Make the distance from the start of the ramp to the start line slightly bigger than the trolley itself.
  2. Measure the distance between the start and finish lines and record this.
  3. Raise the ramp to a height of 10 cm, measure this to confirm. Measure the vertical distance between the finish line and the table.
  4. Hold the trolley with its front touching the start line.
  5. Simultaneously let go of the trolley and start the stopwatch being careful not to exert any force on the trolley.
  6. Stop the stopwatch when the front of the trolley has reached the finish line. Record this time.
  7. Repeat steps 5 to 7 three times with the same height.
  8. Find the average of these values by adding the times and dividing by three. Record this Average.
  9. Increase the height to 20cm, and repeat steps 4 to 9.
  10. Continue this procedure of increasing the height and obtaining the average time until you have results for 6 different heights finishing at 60cm.

To calculate the speed of the trolley at the bottom of the ramp I will use one of the equations of motion:

S= (u+v) t


Rearranging this equation gives

2.S  = u+v


Where S (m) =distance travelled (distance between start and finish lines)

t (s) =time taken ( average time taken for the trolley to reach the finish line)

 As u, the initial speed, will always be zero I will exclude it from the equation.

v (m.s-1)= final speed (The quantity to be calculated)

The final equation is:

2.S  = v


...read more.


The accuracy of data wasn’t consistent throughout. There were great inconsistencies between the timings and distance measurements for example. If I was to repeat the experiment with the changes I have suggested, all major errors would have been eliminated. This would have definitely reduced the error and increased the reliability of the results. Any conclusions made would be much more valid.

The last three data points; at heights 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 metres weren’t in accordance with the line of best fit; they differed greatly. As the times of the trolley reaching the bottom of the ramp decreased, the chance of error in reaction time would increase. The times for the highest inclination 0.3m, were around 0.75 seconds, in this short period of time my human error is likely to be amplified with late reaction times.

The first data point seems to be anomalous, however considering the fact that the last data point should have a lower value for speed, a new line of best fit would be closer to it.

Having considered the major errors caused by my timing, the evidence seems unreliable however I did take three values and average them, this does reduce the error. The other measurements were good and reliable. The difference between my value for the gradient and that predicted wasn’t greatly different, a difference of only 0.009. Even with my errors the results weren’t bad and I feel that conclusions can be drawn from them justifiably.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Electricity and Magnetism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Electricity and Magnetism essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigation into Energy Released From Burning Various Alcohols.

    4 star(s)

    the formula I get: Methanol 1 32 / 1.4 x 9.07 = 207.36 Kj/Mole Ethanol 2 46 / 1.56 x 13.44 = 396.31 Kj/Mole I then averaged these results to give me my final results for energy released when the alcohols were burnt.

  2. "My aim is to find out how much energy is released when burning different ...

    hair back Damaging of eyes Wear safety goggles Paper setting alight Tidy desks, clear of paper Burning or scolding hands Use tongs and set Bunsen burner to safety flame Accuracy and reliability This experiment is fairly accurate but not 100%.

  1. Converting gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy.

    We then repeated the measurement two more times to obtain an average time to make the results more accurate. * We then increased the height (h) in steps of about 2cm, each time taking three measurements of the time taken for the ball bearing to roll 1m along the bench.

  2. Verify the conservation of momentum law, therefore find change in kinetic energy and momentum ...

    Turn on Acorn Risc computer 7. Turn on air glider so that air goes through air glide 8. Set software on velocity of 2 trolleys 9. Separate manually two trolleys and put at each extremity 10. With help of partner push trolleys towards each other at same time 11.

  1. Investigation to see the relationship between actual and theoretical energy released when burning different ...

    C=O = 745 =1490 O-H = 464 =464 Total= 3346 kJ/mol 1 1/2 O=O = 497 =745.5 Total= 2806.5 kJ/mol Energy balance = 2806.5 - 3346 ?H= -539.5 kJ/mol As we go through the homologous series the amount of energy released increases as a lot more bonds are broken than

  2. To find out what happens to the efficiency of a motor as I change ...

    of the object has been lifted against the force of gravity. If an object can fall, it's got gravitational potential energy. The motor we used for our experiment was set up to lift a load 0.5 metres off the ground, in other words, the rotational kinetic energy of the motor's spindle is transferred into movement energy (the same type really)

  1. To investigate how a height of a ramp affects the speed of a trolley ...

    We can use these equations to work out how fast and object drops until it hits the ground (speed): PE= mgh, where m -mass, g- acceleration due to gravity, and h- height. Kinetic energy = 1/2 (mass) x (velocity)2, 1/2 mv2 =mgh or v2 =2gh (when I remove the constants, H v2 look below)

  2. Converting Gravitational Potential Energy to Kinetic Energy.

    A smooth runway enables the ball bearing to descend, uninterrupted by friction, and giving fair results. The distance between the two rules (shown on the diagram) could be widened to decrease the risk of the ball hitting either rule placed on the bench.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work