Diagram
Preliminary work
I will carry out some preliminary work to find out the pH required for optimal pepsin activity.
Variables:
Changed variables – pH (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 molar HCl)
Controlled variables –Same equipment
–Same temperature (40ºc)
–Same person timing
–Same person judging when cross is clearly visible
–Same amount of albumen used in each experiment
–Same amount of pepsin used in each experiment
Measured variables –Time taken for the albumen solution to clear
Method:
- Get out a thermostatically controlled water bath and set it to 40ºC.
- Add 2 molar HCl to a test tube and place in water bath.
- Add pepsin to the test tube.
- Add the albumen. Start the stop watch when the albumen is added.
- Time how long it takes to see the cross on the paper through the bottom of the test tube (when the albumen changes from cloudy to clear the reaction is complete).
- Record the time in a result table. Repeat the experiment.
- Repeat steps 2-6 using 0.5, 1 and 1.5 molar HCl (dilute 2 molar HCl with water to make correct concentrations).
Results Table:
Conclusion:
The results show that the rate of reaction is fastest using 2 molar HCl. Using this information obtained from preliminary work I will use 2 molar HCl for my experiment measuring the effect of pH on the rate of reaction.
Prediction
I predict that the rate of reaction will increase with increasing temperature until the optimum temperature for the reaction is reached. Above the optimum temperature the rate of reaction will fall to zero very quickly, as the enzyme can not fold correctly and becomes inactive. I also predict that the temperature for the optimal rate of reaction for pepsin will be about 37oC as this is body temperature. As I said in the Introduction enzymes I think at about 50ºC and above the enzyme will be denatured and inactive. Below the optimum temperature the reaction time will get increasingly slower for each lower temperature.
Variables
Changed variables –Temperature of the water bath (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70oC)
Controlled variables –Same equipment
–Same HCl concentration
–Same person timing
–Same person judging when cross is clearly visible
–Same amount of albumen used in each experiment
–Same amount of pepsin used in each experiment
Measured variables –Time taken for the albumen solution to clear
Method
- Get out a thermostatically controlled water bath and set it to 20ºC.
- Add 2 molar HCl to a test tube and place in water bath.
- Add pepsin to the test tube.
- Add the albumen. Start the stop watch when the albumen is added.
- Time how long it takes to see the cross on the paper through the bottom of the test tube (when the albumen changes from cloudy to clear the reaction is complete).
- Record the time in a result table. Repeat the experiment two more times.
-
Reset the temperature of the water bath 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70oC and repeat steps 2-6 at each temperature.
Results
Conclusion
The results show that the rate of reaction increased with increasing temperature up to 50oC. Above 50oC the rate of reaction then drops quickly. Therefore in our experiment 50oC is about the optimum rate of reaction for pepsin.
The results support my prediction to an extent but, my prediction was wrong about what I thought the temperature for the optimum rate of reaction would be. I thought the rate of reaction of pepsin would be fastest at about 37ºC because this is body temperature. However the rate of reaction increased as the temperature increased up to about 50ºc. Above the optimum temperature the rate of reaction fell to zero very quickly, as the enzyme denatured. I thought pepsin would denature at 50ºc because as I said in the Introduction enzymes usually denature around 45oC, but in fact it started to denature at 60ºc.
Evaluation
The procedure we used wasn’t too bad, but it could have been better. I don’t think looking at a cross drawn on paper and put underneath the test tube containing the albumen and pepsin solution is a very accurate way of telling when the reaction is finished. This is because the human eye is not very accurate. This is why I think we got an anomalous result: our first attempt at 20ºC was 170 seconds whereas the other two were 80 and 95 seconds. I think this is because he must have called out for the stop watch to be stopped too late. The repeat attempts were mostly strong and good apart from this one anomalous result. If I were to do the experiment again I would use a spectrophotometer to improve the quality of the results. A spectrophotometer is a machine which measures the optical density of solutions and would have accurately recorded the time taken for the albumen to clear.
Also because the test tube had to be taken out of the water bath to put it over the cross on the paper the temperature during each experiment would have changed. It may have been because of this that the temperature recorded for the optimum rate of reaction was 50oC. Although the experiment may have started at this temperature it would have dropped when the test tube was taken out of the water bath. The experiment could therefore be improved by finding a way of keeping the temperature constant while monitoring the reaction.
I compared my results to a friend's in my class who also did the experiment.
My friend’s results were similar to my results. He also found that the rate of reaction was optimum at about 50oC. All of the secondary source’s results are slightly higher except the one at 70oC. I think this is because they must have had someone looking at the cross who called late, or we had someone calling early. Now I have put my results against a secondary source I think that my results are quite reliable because they are pretty much the same. The pattern is very similar.