• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysing Evidence and Drawing Conclusions - Photosynthesis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Skill Area O: Obtaining Evidence Distance from light (cm) Light intensity (lux) Rate of Photosynthesis (number of bubbles/minute) Average bubbles/min Temperature (0C) 1st 2nd 3rd (if needed) 70 147 12 7 7 7+7/2=7, 7 20 60 190 14 15 - 14+15/2=14.5, 15 20 50 240 21 20 - 21+20/2=20.5, 21 20 40 355 26 26 - 26+26/2, 26 20 30 609 28 29 - 28+29/2=28.5, 29 20 20 1359 36 36 - 36+36/2=36, 36 20 10 4780 44 40 42 40+42/2=41, 41 20 Secondary Data Distance from light (cm) Light intensity (lux) Rate of Photosynthesis (number of bubbles/minute) Average bubbles/min Temperature (0C) 1st 2nd 3rd (if needed) 70 20 0 0 - 0+0/2=0, 0 20 60 25 3 5 - 3+5/2=4, 4 20 50 35 8 12 - 8+12/2=10, 10 20 40 55 19 21 - 19+21/2=20, 20 20 30 90 32 32 - 32+32/2=32, 32 20 20 180 48 47 - 48+47/2=47.5, 48 20 10 440 50 49 - 50+49/2=49.5, 50 20 5 920 49 51 - 49+51/2=50, 50 20 Skill Area A: Analysing Evidence and Drawing Conclusions (Continued from graphs) Trend/Pattern The graphs show me that from A - B as the light intensity increases so does the rate of photosynthesis. However from B - C the rate of photosynthesis starts to level off. I think that if I'd done another measurement at 5cm the rate of photosynthesis would have levelled off completely. ...read more.

Middle

Skill Area E: Evaluating Evidence On my lux graph I have noticed that I do have one slightly anomalous result. However it is unclear which result it is. This is because if you look at this graph you can tell that either the fifth or sixth result must be an anomalous result, but the graph would make a smoother line if either of them was taken out. However I believe that the fifth result is probably the anomalous one as if it wasn't there or if it had had a quicker rate of photosynthesis the graph would have increased more steadily for longer and then it would have probably flattened off more than it has, which I believe would have been more accurate. I think that this anomalous result (the fifth result) may have occurred due to the fact that it might have needed to have a bit more time to equilibrate than the other results. This would explain why the rate of photosynthesis is a bit lower for this result than you might expect. One thing that you must also realise about my conclusion is that it is only valid over the range of values that I investigated (i.e. the distance between the light and the pondweed being from 70cm away to 10cm away) and for the particular organisms (elodea, Canadian pondweed) and materials used in this experiment. In my experiment I have been able to identify a few sources of error. ...read more.

Conclusion

However if you were to take three readings one after another, you would be more likely to spot the possibility that the pondweed hasn't fully equilibrated, for the simple reason that it takes longer to do. I think that this might have helped with my anomalous result. On the same topic of 'equilibration', to improve the reliability and accuracy of the results I would also give the pondweed more time to equilibrate e.g. give it two minutes instead of one. This would also lessen the chance of getting similar results before the pondweed has finished equilibrating. There is also some further work that I think I could do to find out more about the effect of light intensity on the rate of photosynthesis. The first thing that I think I could do would be to repeat the whole experiment again, with a different piece of pondweed, and taking measurements three times every 5cm instead as I suggested earlier; I would also make sure that my lamp was the only light source in the room and I would use a proper electric water bath. This would just double check my results again as I did with my friends results earlier on, although it would be more accurate. This is because the measurements would be taken more regularly, I would be sure that the only light in the room was coming from my lamp and the temperature would definitely be the same throughout the experiment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Green Plants as Organisms section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Green Plants as Organisms essays

  1. Investigation To Find The Effect Of Temperature On The Rate Of Photosynthesis Of Elodea.

    photosynthesising as fast as it can, as long as changing the LI is the only variable of the experiment. If there are other variables at the same time as the varying light intensity, this will affect the rate of photosynthesis, and prevent the experiment from being a fair test.

  2. How temperature affects the rate of photosynthesis.

    Again the lowest values are at 0 oC and 65 oC. The optimum temperature is recorded at 43.6 oC and the rate of oxygen produced is 41.7 mm3/min. This graph too like the graph showing individual results starts off at a very low rate (0.3mm/min), and then it gradually increases to 5.2 mm3/min at 15 oC (like the previous graph).

  1. Investigating the effect of temperature on the rate of photosynthesis

    To fit the trend line exactly, the average rate of oxygen released should be around 37mm3/min. There are many possible reasons that could result in these anomalous results. Human error could have affected them, this is because the elodea was changed in between the days.

  2. cooling curves

    A stop clock is then started and the temperature will be noted down every minute for 10 minutes. 4) This same process will be repeated for two concentric polystyrene cups, and then again for three concentric polystyrene cups 5) I will then either repeat the whole experiment another two times

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work