Animal Pharming

Authors Avatar

Niall Watts                10B

Animal Pharming

        My article is on the Animal Pharming. This is a Secondary Genetic modification method of genetic modification. It was developed during the late 1990s, but not yet used commercially used. In the paragraphs to come, I will describe what Animal Pharming is capable of, and my opinion of this form of Genetic Modification.

Animal Pharming is the process of using transgenic animals to produce human drugs. Transgenic animals are animals which have been genetically transformed by inserting other animal or human genes into their chromosomes. The inserted gene enables an animal to make a certain proteins in its milk, urine, blood, sperm, or eggs. Also, organs can be grown for transplants.

Join now!

The proteins produced serve many purposes, including treatments for many diseases such as HIV and malaria. These animals can also produce antibodies, which are used in vaccine development. Transgenic animals are very expensive to produce and they have a high value. Also, only a few of the attempts succeed in producing a transgenic animal. The Financial Times predicted that 600 transgenic cows, could supply the worldwide need for pharmaceuticals.

Now that computers are being used more in laboratories, scientists have reduced the time needed to identify and collect genes. As gene identifying has become easier, each known gene sequence is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The candidate does not quote their research resources which should be quoted in a bibliography and referenced throughout the essay so they give credit to the scientific sources they have used. Punctuation, grammar and spelling all to a very good level. The layout and tone of the essay is also good.

The candidate introduces the topic and explains the concepts of animal pharming well. The pros and cons of animal pharming are assessed in the opening paragraphs to a good degree of detail. The candidate considers a wide range of views to the topic which is good because it shows in depth research and shows the candidate is able to synthesise a variety of topics into a conclusion. I believe the candidate should have included more information about the moral obligations against pharming, and increased the level of detail about why only a few animals can become this transgenic creation and what happens to the animals that don't make the cut.

The response to the question is done very well for this level of qualification. The candidate considers a variety of factors around pharming and explains why they have positive or negative effects. They should expand on certain topics mentioned below to how further consideration of the topics and show deeper understanding.