• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Are Electric Cars better for the Environment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hamza Khalif 11E Are Electric Cars better for the Environment? Introduction In this case study, I will be talking about whether electric cars are better for the Environment. In this discussion I would be talking about the pros and cons about electric cars and the impact it has on the Environment. The Science behind electric cars A non-electric vehicle contains an internal combustion engine and related parts such as a fuel tank, fuel lines, cooling system, and an exhaust pipe system. Electric cars, on the other hand, are more powerful directly by electricity rather than a combustible fuel. An electric car has a rechargeable battery, at least one electric motor, a controller that feeds from electricity to the electric motor(s) based on input from the accelerator pedal, and a charging system. In a modern electric passenger car, the electricity to power the electric motors is as long as by a rechargeable battery pack, an onboard gasoline-engine generator, or a hydrogen fuel cell. In most electric cars, such as the Nissan Leaf, electricity is supplied by a rechargeable battery pack that can be plugged into one of three power sources: a standard household outlet, an advanced home charging system that cuts recharging time in partial, or a quick-charge station provided by a city or public value. When an electric car's battery pack needs to be recharged, plugging the car in to one of these three sources is as easy as plugging in a tough extension cord. It can take as little as one hour to recharge the car using a high-voltage public quick-charge station or as long as 12 hours using a standard household exit. ...read more.

Middle

gas-fired electricity generation was reduced.[2] Electricity from coal, which is the most polluting way to generate power, drastically reduces the environmental advantage for EVs. Because China, for example, generates almost all its power from coal, life cycle analysis of EV cars in China shows they are far more polluting than conventional cars.However in a country like Norway, where most power is generated from hydroelectricity, EVs fairly quickly begin to outperform conventional cars in terms of their overall environmental impact. [2] Majeau-Bettez explains it thus: "For a European average power generation mix, and if you use your car for 150,000km, you could hope for a 25% improvement [in global warming impact] relative to a gasoline car. It seems that the UK has a more intensive coal and natural gas mix so the benefits would be somewhat less than that."[2] Potential Benefits for Owners ?Lower operating costs ?Lower maintenance costs ?Quiet ride ?Convenience (home charging for all-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles eliminates/reduces need to fill-up at gas stations) ?Opportunity to make a ?green? choice Potential Benefits for the Environment ?Reduced emissions of harmful air pollutants ?Increased energy efficiency ?Reduced oil dependency ?Reduced vehicle noise ?Reduced emissions of greenhouse gases Clean cars for the future? [4] For over 100 years, cars have been pouring fumes and soot and poisonous gases into our lungs. Now new developments in batteries and electric motors offer a promise of a cleaner future. Electric cars produce zero CO2 emissions when running, and they don?t emit nitrous oxide or produce other particle emissions either. ...read more.

Conclusion

Batteries are gradually getting better, which could result in electric cars being used for longer. However, as petrol and diesel engines are also improving, the relationships between the different types of vehicles are not constant. . This graph shows us that the electric car is second to produce the most carbon foot print on transportation. Conclusion To conclude on this argument I personally believe that electric cars are better for the environment. At present, for the majority of the country, neither electric vehicles nor comparable gasoline-powered vehicles holds a solid advantage over the other in cleanliness. The balance will probably not change any time in the near future as the problem with electric vehicles is not inbuilt to them, but rather to the means by which we generate our electricity. Although electric vehicles offer some convincing advantages over internal combustion engine vehicles in terms of pollution management, the real advantage of electric vehicles lies in the future when more electricity is produced from cleaner sources. I found out that Hybrid vehicles can reduce fuel costs by 20-40% compared to conventional vehicles [2]. For the next age group of electric vehicles that can be recharged from the electricity grid, the potential energy cost savings are even greater. Based on this evidence this means that without a good national grid with cleaner energy source the risk of batteries to be recharged will be 0% and the global warming and environment pollution will increase in the future. By build a grid which could give an enormous energy without effecting the environment or people, the energy cost could start to fall and could make savings for people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere essays

  1. Human Impact On the Environment

    This is bad for the environment because carbon dioxide is one of the factors causing global warming. The cause of carbon dioxide is the burning of fossil fuels. There is a lot of carbon dioxide because people want a high standard of living and to do so they need a lot of energy to power everything they use.

  2. Alternative Energy Sources

    shows the demand for the different types of fuel available to us. This shows a rapid increase on demand in the 1990's, considering the new technology being introduced and the increasing population that causes a greater demand for energy in the world.

  1. Should the UK government continue to invest in Nuclear power?

    "Nuclear does mean we can generate electricity without carbon emissions. It does provide a consistency of energy which wind power cannot," he said. Mr Darling stressed that "a mix of energy supply is essential and we should not be over dependent on one source".

  2. Extraction of metals and Alloys.

    It is iron (80%) and chromium (15%), nickel (4%) and carbon (1%). Stainless steel is very strong, hard and resists corrosion. It is used in cookware, cutlery and industrial chemical plants. Corrosion of Iron and Steel When iron is exposed to air it will return to its oxide. This is called rusting or corroding.

  1. Runny Oil Coursework.

    I will then take results on a table and then repeat 3 times before moving onto the next oil. I will wipe the tile each time and make sure its dry again to make the test fair. Order I will take all the results in an orderly fashion and repeat

  2. Are humans to blame for Global warming or is it a natural phenomenon? ...

    As the melting back of the ice continues, it would lead to a reduction in 'albedo (surface reflectivity) and allows for greater absorption of solar radiation.' (climate.org) this would result in more solar radiation being absorbed. This would increase the speed at which the planet is warming, which in effect

  1. Alternative Energy Research Essay

    As we see that the Non-OCED[4] will be requiring the most energy in the future world energy economy. This is because Non-OCED is mostly developing countries which will require more energy as they develop. Total world energy use rises from 495 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu)

  2. Are Humans causing global warming?

    The statement says that humans need fossil fuels to eat drink and basically do anything, which is true as to eat the food has to be transported and manufactured, and that burns fossil fuels. The statement also suggest that humans could use the energy sources that do not harm the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work