• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are mobile phones dangerous? Research Project.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are Mobile Phones Dangerous?

Introduction

I am looking at ‘Are mobile phones dangerous?’ The case study has some relevance to the current news topics because the findings have been made public and people are always asking ‘are there any risks’, as you will find out there are many theories and supposed evidence, that may or may not be reliable.                                                                                                        In this study I will be looking for a correlation between mobile phone usage and fertility in men, increased risk of brain tumours and other negative side effects such as concentration levels.

Background information: (information from http://www.vodafone.com.au/personal/aboutvodafone/healthmobilephonetechnology/howdoesthemobilephonesystemwork/index.htm )

Mobile phones use radio waves however some have a higher frequency so can be classed as microwaves. Radio waves are used for communication. Long wave radio has lengths of about 1km.Mobile telephones are two-way radios. When you talk into a mobile telephone, it picks up your voice and converts the sound to radiofrequency energy (or radio waves). The radio waves travel through the air until they reach a receiver at a nearby base station. The base station then sends your call through the telephone network until it reaches the person you are calling.image00.jpg

When you receive a call on your mobile phone, the message travels through the telephone network until it reaches a base station close to your phone. The base station then sends out radio waves that are detected by a receiver in your telephone, where the signals are changed back into voice or data.

...read more.

Middle

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1885775.stm and the BBC needs to keep up a trustworthy image to keep the TV ratings high, so it is unlikely that they would publish something that was not remotely reliable.
  1. Scientists claim there is a considerable amount of evidence proving that microwave radiation from mobile phones causes brain tumours, slower brain function and other health problems. “A considerable body of evidence proves, beyond reasonable doubt, that microwave radiation from mobile phones and cordless phones causes a significantly increased risk for brain tumours, disturbed brain function, and other disturbances including damage to the genes”.  On the following website http://www.psrast.org/mobileng/mobilstarteng.htm#summary the conclusion is written in depth and also diagrams to back up the theory but also to show the effects.                                                                                                The theory coherently fits the other theories with a more detailed analysis. Although everything appears to fit, there is no information about the “scientists” who conducted the survey so how could you believe this with no first hand evidence?
  1. Children should be encouraged to limit exposure from mobile phones to their heads by reducing call time, by making calls where reception is good, by using hands-free devices or speaker options, or by texting. “Children have been warned to text rather than call, on their mobile phones by the federal government’s radiation safety watchdog”.                                This is due to the fact that children have softer growing skulls meaning more neurological damage would be inflicted as a pose to adults.                                        The website is http://www.
...read more.

Conclusion

The website is http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/cell-phones-are-safe-for-now-say-danish-researchers-1836100.html                                                         I think the source is quite reliable because the survey involved over 60,000 people.Researchers published the findings of the six-year £8.8 million Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) programme, which concluded there was no evidence that using a mobile for less than ten years was linked to brain cancer. “It also concluded mobile phone signals did not alter brain function and were not linked to cases of electrical hypersensitivity”.         The website is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1562894/Mobile-phones-safe-in-the-short-term.html                                                                                 I think this source is reliable because by saying ‘in the short term’ is not denying long mobile phone usage will affect you, shows you that the source is honest. All they are saying is that they have not found a correlation between brain tumours and mobile phone usage in under eight years. A new study has provided further research to suggest that using a mobile phone does not increase the risk of brain cancer. “Japanese researchers found that regular mobile phone users were not at an increased risk of three types of brain cancer”.Participants included 322 brain cancer patients and 683 healthy people in Tokyo.                                                The website is http://www.inthenews.co.uk/news/health/mobile-phones-are-safe-$1197458.htm                                                                                         I think the source could be reliable because it informs the audience of both arguments to give them a better understanding and ultimately make their own decisions.
...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Waves section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Overall the writing is of a good standard but some reformatting of the text and also the addition of footnotes would help with the flow of the essay. Also include discussion of difference between facts and opinions and how that may affect reliability of websites. A few more diagrams, perhaps of waves and maybe mobile phones may help.

Marked by teacher Ed Mguni 22/02/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Waves essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigation:To find the refractive index of cooking oil.

    4 star(s)

    Another method, which could be used to avoid hitting the bump, would be as follows. The tray could be drawn round and with the image on the paper it could be cut out. By placing it around the outside of the container, acting like a collar, when the light rays

  2. Marked by a teacher

    An investigation into the factors affecting the frequency of a standing wave

    4 star(s)

    Although you can read off the signal generator what the frequency needed to make the wave is, it is very inaccurate as it only reads off to the nearest Hz. Therefore, I decided to link the signal generator to the cathode ray oscilloscope and use the graph created on the

  1. Peer reviewed

    Mobile Phone case study

    4 star(s)

    Picocells only have a range of a few hundred metres and may be used to boost weak signals within large buildings or where there is a dense population of users, such as in airport terminals, train stations and shopping centres.

  2. Investigation Into How the Depth of Water Affects the Speed of a Wave.

    � Use a wider range of depths. � Use more accurate apparatus for measuring time and distance. All of these would enable me to make more detailed and accurate conclusions. Ultimately I think my initial plan was suitable, giving the time and apparatus available to me, but could be improved or expanded upon by considering all of the above.

  1. Investigating the speed of travelling waves in water.

    When the tray is lowered, it will be done by hand at an even uniform speed. Obviously, the speed in which this is achieved; every time the tray is lowered will not always be identical, but a general similarity in speed will be attained.

  2. Focal length of Concave and Convex lens

    So, we can get the right focal length accurately. In the experiment of finding the focal length of concave lens the result is quite difficult to obtain. Since the light rays need to travel a long distance and we cant measure the size of the image and make comparison with the object.

  1. The aim of my experiment is to see what factors affect electromagnetism the most ...

    around the electromagnet (I know that the heat can't be absolutely controlled but I can make sure that it differs as little as possible) and that I am to use the same nail throughout all tests (results may differ from nail to nail because of varying material etc.).

  2. To investigate how the depth of the water will effect the speed of a ...

    the less easily the particles will be able to move up and down so the speed of the wave will be slower. In my experiment the liquid I am using is water as so it is highly unlikely that range in viscosity of each tray full will be enough to affect the speed of the wave that greatly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work