• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

investigation of properties of a pair of cis, trans isomers

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TAS experiment No 18 (Chung Pui Wu) 1. Date 2. Title Investigation of properties of a pair of cis, trans isomers 3. Objective Determine the percentage yield of fumaric acid. Compare the properties, like solubility in water , acid strength and reaction with acidified potassium permanganate, of the cis and trans isomers (maleic acid and fumaric acid). 4. Introduction Butenedioic acid, C4H4O4, exists as two distinct geometrical isomers: These two isomers of butenedioic acid are commonly known as maleic acid and fumaric acid (not necessarily in that order). Each of them has its own distinctive properties such as melting point, solubility in water, density and stability. In this experiment you will convert some maleic acid to fumaric acid by heating in an aqueous solution containing some hydrochloric acid, which serves as a catalyst. You will then compare the properties of these two isomers and use the results to identify which isomer is maleic acid and which isomer is fumaric acid. 5. Procedure Day 1 Part A - Conversion of maleic acid to fumaric acid 1. Weigh out about 4g of maleic acid in a clean, dry 100cm3 beaker. Record the mass accurately. 2. Add about 15cm3 of distilled water to beaker. Warm the mixture slightly to dissolve the acid completely. 3. Add about 10cm3 of concentrated hydrochloric acid to the beaker, and cover it with a small watch glass. ...read more.

Middle

Reaction with acidified potassium permanganate Maleic acid decolourizes acidified potassium permanganate solution. The volume of maleic acid required = 6cm3 Fumaric acid cannot decolourize acidified potassium permanganate solution. 7. Questions 1. Calculate the percentage yield of fumaric acid in this experiment. 2. Why is it important to use chilled distilled water when filtering the fumaric acid formed? 3. Write the chemical equations for the reactions of cis-butenedioic acid and trans- butenedioic acid with the following: a) magnesium b) sodium carbonate c) acidified potassium permanganate 4. With the reference to the data obtained in the tests of solubility in water and acid strength ,state which isomers of butenedioic acid (cis or tans) maleic acid and fumaric acid correspond to. Explain your reasons. 5. What is the purpose of the test with acidified potassium permanganate? 6. One of the isomers can undergo dehydration to form a cyclic anhydride. Explain which one it is with the help of a chemical equation. (1) The percentage yield of fumaric acid in this experiment is 42.7%. (2) Use chilled distilled water to make the fumaric acid to be more saturated. The solubility of fumaric acid is much insoluble in water as there is no net dipole moment in fumaric acid. When adding chilled distilled water which makes lower temperature environment, more furnaric crystal would be formed by saturation. (3) a) reaction of cis-butenedioic acid with magnesium + 2Mg � H2 + reaction of trans-butenedioic acid with magnesium + 2Mg � H2 + b) ...read more.

Conclusion

It's because the equilibrium shift much towards the fumaric acid side. In fumaric acid, the two bulky carboxyl groups (-COOH) are further apart and experience less steric repulsion. Part B experiments show maleic acid is more soluble and acidic than fumaric acid. The oxidizing power of maleic acid is higher than fumaric acid. There are some sources of error in the experiment. In part A experiment, when placing the beaker containing maleic acid, conc. HCI inside the bigger beaker, our group let large amount of tap water add to the maleic acid. It lowers the conc. of maleic acid and thus obtain less amount of solid of fumaric acid. The percentage yield of fumaric acid I calculated is lower than 50%. So the reaction mixture should be placed carefully and prevent water affect its conc. It's hard to ensure to maleic acid is 100% pure to be converted to fumaric acid. As the maleic acid has impurities, the fumaric acid produced also has impurities. The percentage yield of fumaric acid I calculated is lower than the accurate value. There is loss of maleic acid when it is heated. It's because maleic acid is heated to gas state. The vapour of maleic acid may return to the tap water in the bigger beaker instead of the mixture. It reduces the amount of fumaric acid produced. The percentage yield of fumaric acid I calculated is lower. 9. Conclusion The percentage yield of fumaric acid in this experiment is 42.7%. Maleic acid is more soluble and acidic than fumaric acid. Maleic acid decolourize acidified potassium permanganate while fumaric acid does not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Organic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Organic Chemistry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    rates of reaction- hydrochloric acid

    3 star(s)

    ( Test tube temperate needs to be kept the same because if the temperature increased, the reaction would be faster and would cause inaccurate results. Preliminary Work: I did a preliminary test where magnesium and hydrochloric acid were mixed together to cause a reaction.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Rate of reaction between Calcium Carbonate and Hydrochloric Acid

    4 star(s)

    the line of best fit, which is almost straight and illustrates that the relationship between the concentration and the rate of reaction is proportional. Evaluation The results obtained were reliable and helped me prove my hypothesis correct but with a few anomalies which could be due to minor inaccuracy errors.

  1. Rate of reaction of hydrochloric acid on magnesium.

    then more molecules will occur therefore an increased amount of collisions between the particles will happen. The conclusion to this is that the rate of reaction will increase, because the higher the concentration the faster the rate of reaction. * The volume of hydrochloric acid must always be 25cm3.

  2. The rates of reaction between CaCO3 and HCL

    Conclusion: The aim of the investigation was find out which of two samples of limestone was purist. The sample found to be purer by the data collected is west. The proof of this is. * From the graph, the curve of the graph follows the proven reaction curve.

  1. Determining the water of crystalisation

    I reached the deviation from the mean value, which is 0, and my uncertainty is ?1.19%. Thus I can conclude that my outcome is valid and I can state that the formula of hydrated copper sulphate is: CuSO4 * 5H2O Evaluating procedure and results.

  2. Affect of concentration on reaction

    see the gas produced by the two concentrations 1.4020: 0.3205 is approximately in the scale of 5:1. Formula for working out the gradient (All to 3 decimal places) Concentration (moles) Place in Formula Initial Gradient 0.0 0 0.000 0.4 0.38 � 5 = 0.070 0.8 0.80 � 5 = 0.160

  1. The role of mass customization and postponement in global logistics

    (Figure 4 omitted) This is where the product formulation differs by market, either because of customer preference or varying. technical standards. In the case of bundled manufacturing, the postponement aim is to retain product commonality for as long as possible in the production process.

  2. Rate of reaction of different concentrations of sodium thiosulphate.

    I predict that if I decrease the concentration of Na2S2O3 then more time will be taken for the rate of the reaction to occur as well as the obstruction of the cross. This is because fewer particles will be present in the solution as the water molecules will prevent particles

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work