Covalent bonding

Authors Avatar

Covalent bonding is an intermolecular form of chemical bonding characterized by the sharing of one or more pairs of electrons between two components, producing a mutual attraction that holds the resultant molecule together. Atoms tend to share electrons in such a way that their outer electron shells are filled - this is referred to as electron configuration. Such bonds are always stronger than the intermolecular hydrogen bond and similar in strength to or stronger than the ionic bond.

In contrast to the ionic and metallic bond, the covalent bond is directional, i.e. the bond angles have a great impact on the strength of the bond. Because of the directional character of the bond, covalently bound materials are more difficult to deform than metals. The cause of the directionality is the form of the s, p, d, and f orbitals. In organic chemistry, the directionality of the bonding is often described by hybrid orbitals.

Join now!

Covalent bonding most frequently occurs between atoms with similar electronegativities. For this reason, non-metals tend to engage in covalent bonding more readily since metals have access to metallic bonding, where the easily-removed electrons are more free to roam about. For non-metals, liberating an electron is more difficult, so sharing is the only option when confronted with another species of similar electronegativity.

However, covalent bonding involving metals is particularly important, especially in industrial catalysis and process chemistry. Many polymerization techniques require catalysis involving metal-organic covalent bonds. In their more useful applications, metals often engage in more exotic covalent bonding, such as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

Generally, the spelling, grammar and punctuation are good. The technical terms were used appropriately in the work, with the exception of the misunderstanding of electron configuration. This misunderstanding would obviously lower the mark as it is one of the fundamentals to the topic of bonding in Chemistry. It would also perhaps have been appropriate to define some of the technical terms (such as what is meant by a sigma bond) just for clarity. Overall, the quality of the piece of work is good and doesn’t present any major problems that would significantly lower the mark achieved.

The student, with an obvious understanding of covalent bonds, has analysed the bonding well. They have broken down the bonding into different sections and clearly laid out their work. This in turn improved the fluency of the work. The examples used to illustrate the different covalent bonds were spot on, despite them being the typical examples that most students use. However, this does not affect the mark as all the student is required to do is to demonstrate a clear understanding of the question set and support this understanding by illustrating it with an example. Therefore, the usage of the examples made it clear that they understood the difference and could give an example to support it. No necessary conclusion was required as presumably the question was only about describing covalent bonds.

It is hard to judge the question set for such a piece of work as it will vary from one exam board to another. Overall, it seems the question is based on covalent bonding. This, the student addresses and answers very well. However, there are a few questionable areas. The student shows a clear understanding of what a covalent bond is, but generalises too much in the definition. Perhaps distinguishing between single covalent bonding and dative covalent bonding is necessary here. This would show the student’s understanding of the topic further by being able to differentiate between different types of covalent bonding right from the start of the work. In turn, this would contribute to the student gaining a higher grade as they have gone ‘one step further’ in answering the question. One major error in this is what the student defined as electron configuration. It is not how atoms tend to share electrons, but simply the configuration of electrons in the energy levels in the atom. Their response is very clearly laid out but the diagram of CH4 perhaps lacks a title and a description of why it had been used in the work (i.e. its relevance to the question).