• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of Relative atomic mass of lithium

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assessed Practical 3 Determination of Relative atomic mass of lithium Jared Ching Evaluation: In general the accuracy of the experiments was good. However with practice, the accuracy could be improved; accuracy being how close the results are to the real answer. I think I have carried pit the experiment as well as I possibly could at the time with the given conditions and time period allowed. I have gained precise results from the practical. However, looking back at the analysis section, the relative atomic mass values I found were not exactly 6.9 as presented in the periodic timetable. Method (1) gave me 8.28; a difference of 1.38 and method (2) gave me 7.37, a difference of 0.43 to the real/reference value. Therefore method (2) proved to be more accurate. Overall the results were good and came close to the real values. There were no anomalous results. Limitations: The main sources of error that I found to be evident and which were out of my control were as follows: * In method (1), due to the oil that lithium is stored in, not only ...read more.

Middle

I also found that the reacted solution sometimes returned to a slight pink colour even after turning completely colourless. Thus this caused inevitable error. Accuracy and reliability: In method (1) the procedure was very accurate; the equipment used is very accurate, however as mentioned before, the gas lost when replacing the bung caused a degree of inaccuracy. As shown by the results, with the relative atomic mass found to be +1.38 over. In method (2) not only were the results accurate but also precise. The final relative atomic mass coming out as only +0.43 over the reference value proves a high degree of accuracy. Looking at the results table, the three accurate titrations fall within 0.1cm3 and 0.3cm3 of each other, which is a very concurrent set of results. Clearly method (1) and method (2) differ in accuracy and precision. Method (1) is clearly less accurate and precise as the gas collected from the reaction of lithium and water was not exact as hydrogen was lost in the process. ...read more.

Conclusion

Due to the fact that the colour change and when to stop the tap is not very obvious, more indicator should be used in order to make the more subtle changes in colour more visible. The burette tap should be opened at full until there is a small change in colour, then the tap should be closed slightly so that only drops of acid are coming through, this will improve accuracy as it will be clearer when the reaction is complete, thus more concurrent results will be produced. Clearly there is also a need for a control, although it was initially thought that it was very obvious when the solution turns colourless, this practical has shown that a control would be useful to compare the colours. However the other problem of the solution returning to a slight pink colour can be eliminated by waiting for this to occur, and when it does, titrate it further opening the burette very slightly, allowing acid to be added more slowly into the solution. Carrying out titrations is a skill that develops with practice, more repetitions will lead to improved results, both in accuracy and precision. Both methods are the most accurate, considering the equipment available. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    I will add 5 drops of phenolphthalein indicator to the solution in the flask. 5. I will titrate the solution with the hydrochloric acid and record the results. 6. I will repeat the titration twice more. Analysis -Experiment 1 I used 100cm3 of H2O, which reacted, with 0.09g of Lithium to produce 158 cm3 H2 gas.

  2. The Determination of an Equilibrium Constant.

    volumetric flasks where the mixtures were kept and allowed to reach their equilibrium were not airtight enough. A closed system is essential to the formation of any equilibrium, because no material is exchanged with the surroundings. The flasks might have not been airtight enough to prevent any exchange between the

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    gained from a source: n = Volume X Molarity 1000 n = this is the number of moles of HCL (hydrochloric acid), what I am trying to find. Volume = this volume I am going to put here is the average (or mean titre cm3)

  2. Determine the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Like sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide. If inhalation of lithium hydroxide occurs, remove source of contamination or move victim to fresh air and seek medical attention. Lithium hydroxide can be very irritating to the skin. Solid lithium hydroxide or concentrated solutions may cause severe tissue damage.

  1. To determine the relative atomic mass of Lithium

    mass Molar mass = Mass / Number of moles = 0.11 / 0.01462 = 7.5239 = 7.52 The Relative atomic mass of Lithium is 7.52 when titrating the LiOH with HCl acid. EVALUATION I think that my practical went well and was suitable for the task given.

  2. copper practical

    In a laboratory, the copper ore (copper pyrites) is crushed up by using a mortar. It is then further crushed until it is a fine powder. Concentrating the ore The ore is then concentrated by getting rid of all unwanted impurities by carrying out the process of froth flotation.

  1. to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via ...

    I think that with improvement in procedure and method this could have been closer to the true value of 6.94. It all depends on the accuracy, limitations in a procedure and the uncertainties in an experiment, taking all the evidence into account, such as the results and readings along with

  2. Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium

    I will repeat the titration twice more. Analysis Experiment 1 I used 100cm3 of H2O which reacted with 0.09g of Lithium to produce 158 cm3 H2 gas. Since 1 mole of gas at room temperature and pressure occupies 24 dm3: Moles of H2 = 158 x 10-3 = 6.6

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work