• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Calcium

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Calcium In this experiment, I will determine the relative atomic mass of calcium by two different methods. * By measuring the volume of hydrogen produced. * By titrating the lithium hydroxide produced. Method 1 * 0.10g of calcium used. * 100cm3 of distilled water used. Results Method 1 Mass of Calcium (g) Total volume of gas produced (cm3) 0.10 37 * Starting point of water in cylinder = 238cm3 * Ending point, after reaction complete, of water in cylinder= 201cm3 * (238 - 201 = 37) Deduction of 37cm3, therefore 37cm3 of hydrogen gas produced. 1 mol of gas occupies 24000 cm3 at room temperature and pressure. Ca (s) + 2H2O (l) --> Ca(OH)2 (aq) + H2 (g) * Number of moles of hydrogen = volume of hydrogen / 24000 = 37/24000 = 0.0015416 mol = 0.001542 mol (4sf) * Number of moles of calcium = 0.001542 (ratio 1:1 with hydrogen) * Relative atomic mass of calcium = Mass of calcium / Moles = 0.10 / 0.001542 = 64.85084 = 64.85 (4sf) Method 2 * 25.0cm3 of alkaline solution used. * Amount of acid used: Starting Amount of HCl used (cm3) Amount of acid used till reaction complete- Test 1 (cm3) ...read more.

Middle

If the gas syringe is used, it would give a percentage error of 1.35 % (0.5 / 37 * 100 = 1.3513). Where as the measuring cylinder gave a percentage error of 2.70 % (1 / 37 * 100 = 2.7027). This shows if the gas syringe is used it would reduce the gap for error. Another possible error is that the calcium could have been kept for so long that it might have oxidised when it was left out in the open. This would mean that less calcium would react and would have lowered the value of the gas produced. This would give a higher relative atomic mass when calculated. To prevent this, if the experiment is repeated, it can be made sure that the lid on the pot of calcium is always kept on and only taken off when it is needed. This would reduce the oxidising of the calcium. The reaction may have been stopped before it was completed. This would results in less gas being produced and this would make the relative atomic mass higher. Also there could have been a default in the equipment being used. There could have been leakage in the pipe, causing a certain amount of gas to escape into the atmosphere and not into the measuring cylinder. ...read more.

Conclusion

If too much hydrochloric acid had been let into the solution, the value recorded in the results would be higher therefore the average would come out higher and this would give a lower relative atomic mass. The weighing scale used measured to 2 decimal places. To make the results more accurate and reduce the percentage of error a weighing scale which measured to 3 decimal places could have been used. This aspect has already been discussed in the method 1 part of the evaluation. The experiment could also be carried out a higher number of times to get an more accurate average and more accurate relative atomic mass. The error with the oxidisation of the calcium could also apply to this method and has been discussed in the first part of the evaluation. In comparison method 2 is more accurate than method 1. This is because method 2 gave a relative atomic mass of 59.17 which is closer to the factual value of 40.1when compared to the value gained by method 1, 64.85. Also the accuracy can be linked to the percentage error as method one gave a higher percentage error than method two (method 1 = 61.72 %, method 2 = 49.56 %). Overall, both methods are very inaccurate (high percentage errors). But in comparison, method 2 is a better way of determining the relative atomic mass of calcium. DEV SEN 6L AS CHEMISTRY MODULAR COURSEWORK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of magnesium.

    Another factor that may have caused the anomaly is error in measurement. This could be a misjudgement through human error for example; an error in misjudging the water mark in a burette or measuring cylinder could cause slight inaccuracy. The measuring devices that I used are all fairly accurate, the

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Lithium = 0.09g 1 mol of Li = 0.09 = 8.0g 0.0112 Thus the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium is 8.0g mol-1 from experiment 2. Natural lithium exists as two isotopes: lithium-7 (92.5 percent) and lithium-6 (7.5 percent) so the relative atomic mass of lithium is; (92.5 x 7)

  1. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    could have been made up into larger volumetric flasks or at a lower concentration, which would have made it easier to collect all the solute and washings without over shooting the graduation mark on the volumetric flasks. As this was a preliminary experiment only a few results were collected.

  2. The Determination of an Equilibrium Constant.

    react with I mole of OH- ?There are 1.5 * 10-3 * 250 = 0.375 mole H+ in the 250 cm3 mixture 3 Number of moles of HCl in the mixture = 1 /1000 * 25 = 0.025 mole Number of moles of CH3COOH at equilibrium = 0.375 - 0.025

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Even though I had the opportunity to perform the experiment more than once, I feel a fourth time would have made my result much more accurate, however I am satisfied that there was enough time to perform the implementation more than once.

  2. to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via ...

    the likely errors, I can state whether or not the readings were reliable. An analysis of the errors in experimental results indicates how reliable they are. It can also suggest which aspects of the experimental method could be altered to reduce the error in the final result.

  1. Determination of the Relative Atomic mass of Lithium

    So the oil and or ether on the lithium could increase the weight of the lithium which again affects the results of the experiment. There was also the possibility of gas loss when doing the 1st experiment, this is because there was a certain time delay when placing the bung

  2. Determine the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    So therefore the mole ratio of lithium and hydrogen is 2:1. To deduce the moles of lithium used we must multiply the number of moles of lithium collected. 0.00625 x 2 = 0.0125 Now that the mole of the lithium has been calculated, we can use this to work out the relative atomic mass of lithium.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work