• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Calcium

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Calcium In this experiment, I will determine the relative atomic mass of calcium by two different methods. * By measuring the volume of hydrogen produced. * By titrating the lithium hydroxide produced. Method 1 * 0.10g of calcium used. * 100cm3 of distilled water used. Results Method 1 Mass of Calcium (g) Total volume of gas produced (cm3) 0.10 37 * Starting point of water in cylinder = 238cm3 * Ending point, after reaction complete, of water in cylinder= 201cm3 * (238 - 201 = 37) Deduction of 37cm3, therefore 37cm3 of hydrogen gas produced. 1 mol of gas occupies 24000 cm3 at room temperature and pressure. Ca (s) + 2H2O (l) --> Ca(OH)2 (aq) + H2 (g) * Number of moles of hydrogen = volume of hydrogen / 24000 = 37/24000 = 0.0015416 mol = 0.001542 mol (4sf) * Number of moles of calcium = 0.001542 (ratio 1:1 with hydrogen) * Relative atomic mass of calcium = Mass of calcium / Moles = 0.10 / 0.001542 = 64.85084 = 64.85 (4sf) Method 2 * 25.0cm3 of alkaline solution used. * Amount of acid used: Starting Amount of HCl used (cm3) Amount of acid used till reaction complete- Test 1 (cm3) ...read more.

Middle

If the gas syringe is used, it would give a percentage error of 1.35 % (0.5 / 37 * 100 = 1.3513). Where as the measuring cylinder gave a percentage error of 2.70 % (1 / 37 * 100 = 2.7027). This shows if the gas syringe is used it would reduce the gap for error. Another possible error is that the calcium could have been kept for so long that it might have oxidised when it was left out in the open. This would mean that less calcium would react and would have lowered the value of the gas produced. This would give a higher relative atomic mass when calculated. To prevent this, if the experiment is repeated, it can be made sure that the lid on the pot of calcium is always kept on and only taken off when it is needed. This would reduce the oxidising of the calcium. The reaction may have been stopped before it was completed. This would results in less gas being produced and this would make the relative atomic mass higher. Also there could have been a default in the equipment being used. There could have been leakage in the pipe, causing a certain amount of gas to escape into the atmosphere and not into the measuring cylinder. ...read more.

Conclusion

If too much hydrochloric acid had been let into the solution, the value recorded in the results would be higher therefore the average would come out higher and this would give a lower relative atomic mass. The weighing scale used measured to 2 decimal places. To make the results more accurate and reduce the percentage of error a weighing scale which measured to 3 decimal places could have been used. This aspect has already been discussed in the method 1 part of the evaluation. The experiment could also be carried out a higher number of times to get an more accurate average and more accurate relative atomic mass. The error with the oxidisation of the calcium could also apply to this method and has been discussed in the first part of the evaluation. In comparison method 2 is more accurate than method 1. This is because method 2 gave a relative atomic mass of 59.17 which is closer to the factual value of 40.1when compared to the value gained by method 1, 64.85. Also the accuracy can be linked to the percentage error as method one gave a higher percentage error than method two (method 1 = 61.72 %, method 2 = 49.56 %). Overall, both methods are very inaccurate (high percentage errors). But in comparison, method 2 is a better way of determining the relative atomic mass of calcium. DEV SEN 6L AS CHEMISTRY MODULAR COURSEWORK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of magnesium.

    Another factor that may have caused the anomaly is error in measurement. This could be a misjudgement through human error for example; an error in misjudging the water mark in a burette or measuring cylinder could cause slight inaccuracy. The measuring devices that I used are all fairly accurate, the

  2. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    The whole solid may not have dissolved fully in the acid/distilled water needed to create the correct concentration of solutions in both the Oxalic Acid (aq) and the Potassium Manganate (VII) (aq). If this had occurred the solutions produced would have been less concentrated resulting in any equations done using their concentration being inaccurate.

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    of base = 2.8 x 10-3 = 0.112 mol dm-3 25.0 x 10-J In 1 dm3 of base there is 0.0112 mol of Lithium Hydroxide 2 moles of Lithium produce 2 moles of Lithium Hydroxide = 1:1 0.0112 mol of Lithium hydroxide = 0.0112 mol of Lithium 0.0112 mol of

  2. The determination of the solubility of calcium hydroxide.

    Then transfer this diluted solution via the funnel to fill up the burette to 50cm ready to use. * Then use pipette filler and pipette to transfer 25cm of limewater containing calcium hydroxide to a 250 conical flask. * Then using a mini pipette add 3 drops of methyl orange indicator to the conical flask containing the limewater.

  1. Determine the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    From that we can deduce the number of moles of lithium hydroxide used in the titration. To do this I have to work out the mole ratio of the lithium hydroxide and the hydrochloric acid. To get the mole ratio we would need to examine the formula of the reaction.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of Lithium

    X 100% The main sources of error in procedure and in measurements are: * Random errors, they are associated with most measurements. They can never be eliminated entirely, but reducing them increases the precision of the final result. Improving techniques, making multiple measurements or using instruments with a higher degree of precision can reduce them.

  1. to determine the relative atomic mass of lithium. We will be doing this via ...

    I think that with improvement in procedure and method this could have been closer to the true value of 6.94. It all depends on the accuracy, limitations in a procedure and the uncertainties in an experiment, taking all the evidence into account, such as the results and readings along with

  2. Determination of the Relative Atomic mass of Lithium

    Method 1 Sources of Error: The first thing we notice when going to measure out our desired mass of Lithium, is that many of the pieces had formed an oxide layer on the outside as they must have been previously exposed to the air.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work