• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of the relative atomic mass of Lithium

Extracts from this document...


A Level Chemistry Coursework Determination of the relative atomic mass of Lithium Implementing The following shows my observations in the form of tables. Results from Method One Mass of lithium 0.11 grams Volume of hydrogen produced 0.186 dm� Results from Method Two Reading ? 1 2 3 Burette Initial (cm3) 0 0 0 Reading Final (cm3) 38.8 38.6 38.6 Titre (cm3) 38.8 38.6 38.6 Analysis Method One Results Using the method given I found the volume of hydrogen produced to be as stated below: Mass of lithium 0.11 grams Volume of hydrogen produced 0.186 dm� We were told to assume that 1 mole of gas occupies 24000 cm� at room temperature and pressure. Using these readings the aim was to do the following: * Calculate the number of moles of hydrogen. * Deduce the number of moles of lithium, and * Using these values and the original mass of lithium, calculate the relative atomic mass of lithium. Therefore with the use of the formulas below, I can complete the aim. 1. Number of moles = mass � Ar. (n = m � Ar) 2. Number of moles = volume � 24 (used for gases). (n = V � 24) So I then used these formulas in the equation below to work out the number of moles of hydrogen and lithium. 2Li (s) + 2H2O (l) 2LiOH (aq) + H2 (g) ...read more.


* The plan had told me to weigh about 0.10 grams of lithium on a scale, it should have given a range, because how can I tell how much about really is? * The lithium had to be added to the distilled water as quickly as possible, without losing any hydrogen gas. It was all about your reaction time, if too slow then a lot more gas escapes than if you were fast. * There was already air bubbles present in the measuring cylinder prior to the reaction, this meant that the end volume of hydrogen gas would be a percentage higher than it would be if there were no bubbles. * The delivery tube may have had some substance inside (left over from a previous experiment), so the volume of gas entered cannot therefore, be to its maximum. * The fact that the methods did not tell me to rinse the apparatus, i.e. the burette with HCl meant that there may have been other substances still in adhesion with the glass. EVALUATION I am confident that my results are reliable because my final relative atomic mass came to be 7.11, which is 0.21 units away from the actual relative atomic mass of 6.9. I think that the overall accuracy of my experiments was fair because the Ar was 7.11, but I think that with improvement this could have been closer to 6.9. ...read more.


Smaller divisions in measuring apparatus means that if errors are made then they will be to a small percentage error. Using equipment like syringes can be easier to use and more accurate depending on the scale divisions. The uncertainties in the evidence in terms of their effect on the measure of confidence, which can be placed on my final conclusion drawn, are: * The percentage errors, below I have drawn a table which states the percentage errors along with the absolute values: Quantity Measured by ...... Value � absolute value Percentage error Volume (cm3) Measuring cylinder (186 � 0.1) cm3 � 0.053 % (2sf) Volume (cm3) Burette (38.6 � 0.1) cm3 � 0.26 % (2sf) Mass (g) Top pan balance (0.11 � 0.001) g � 0.91 % (2sf) So therefore the percentage error can affect the validity of the conclusions drawn and also determine how misreading the scale (random errors (reading errors)) or reading a measurement through the wrong point (systematic errors (parallax error)) can make an error no matter how small or big the error is. For equipment such as the pipette is hard to work out the percentage error, because all I knew was that the mark on the neck meant that the volume of liquid up to that point was 25cm3. As there are no other markings such as scales, I couldn't work out the absolute value. Secondary sources used: * The Usbourne science dictionary, * Chemistry 1 * Encarta By Priyesh Patel 12O ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of magnesium.

    there is oil left on the lithium when weighing it may affect the weight, making the experiment less accurate. It would improve the accuracy and reliability of my experiment to completely clean of the lithium before using it, although care must be taken to make sure the surface of the lithium does not oxidise.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Number of moles The mass of lithium used in 100cm3 is 0.05g. So, the relative atomic mass of lithium = 0.05g 7.468 x 10-3 = 6.6952 Conclusion: The relative atomic mass of lithium is 6.70 EVALUATION I feel that overall the results of my experiment were fairly accurate.

  1. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    If volumes of Sulphuric Acid (aq) and Iron (II) Ammonium Sulphate (aq) were added together they might not have produced 10cm3 of solution as the solutions contained different densities thus the required concentration of solution would not have been produced.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Secondly, lithium was given to the students in a bottle. The students had to remove small amounts of lithium, weigh it on measuring scales and cut the lithium using a knife and tweezers. By the time, the students had measured out 0.10g of lithium for the first experiment; the lithium

  1. Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Calcium

    Because of this, when the relative atomic mass of calcium is being calculated, it would come out higher. The measuring cylinder measured to the 1 cm3. This means there is a possibility for +1 cm3 error or -1 cm3 error.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    Small measuring cylinder had an error of +/- 1 cm3 3) Burette had an error of +/- 0.05 cm3 4) Measuring balance has an error of +/- 0.005g 5) Pipette has an error of +/- 0.005 cm3 I will no work out the percentage error of each systematic error which took place.

  1. Determination of the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium

    When I was filling up my conical flask with 100cm3 I could have used less or more than exactly 100cm3, so the amount of water I was reacting with the Lithium could have been more or less than I thought, although I am sure I measured this very accurately so there should be little error there.

  2. construction science and materials

    ettringite and, in later stages, gypsum formation The necessary additional calcium is provided by the calcium hydroxide and calcium silicate hydrate in the cement paste The effect of these changes is an overall loss of concrete strength. The above effects are typical of attack by solutions of sodium sulphate or potassium sulphate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work