• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6

# Determine the penetrating power and the range in air of the three radioactive emissions (Plutonium 239 for alpha, Strontium 90 for beta and Cobalt 60 for gamma).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aim

To determine the penetrating power and the range in air of the three radioactive emissions (Plutonium 239 for alpha, Strontium 90 for beta and Cobalt 60 for gamma).

Method 1

The apparatus were set up as in the diagram below to measure the range in air up to 50 cm for each source.

Before the experiment took place the background radiation was measured as 80 counts in 5 minutes therefore 16 counts per minute.  Experimental precautions were:

The radioactive source is aligned with a ruler to the GM tube as accurately as possible so that the maximum radiation is measured

A set square was used to measure the exact point at which the source and tube were placed

The counter was reset each time so the counter read zero so this would reduce zero error in the experiment and the hold button was pressed to freeze the measurement

Thirty seconds were left between the start of the count and the recording so the reading would be less instantaneous and more reliable

Middle

Distance (cm)

Corrected counts per 30secs.

Counts per 30secs. (original data)

5

526

534

10

183

191

15

99

107

20

41

49

25

37

45

30

30

38

35

19

27

40

25

33

45

19

27

50

12

20

Results 2

 Alpha - paper Material Corrected counts per 30secs. Counts per 30secs. (original data) None 152 160 Tissue paper 8 16 Paper 0 8 Card 4 12 Beta - aluminium Thickness (mm)

Conclusion

Evaluation

The results were quite accurate as they corresponded with evidence in the AS/A2 Physics (Mee, Cundell, Arnold and Brown) and the Nelson Modular Science (Mark Elise and Chris Honey) books.   However some of the graphs required lines of best fit to distinguish a trend.  The results were precise as they followed a nearly uniform pattern of an exponential graph.

However in the graph for gamma ‘s range in air the smaller count rates were not steady and the increased further away from the source for one reading but then decreased again.  This could be due to the fact thast decay is a random process.  Furthermore the background radiation may not have been as constant and precise as thought.  The percentage error in the GM counter is:

= absolute error x 100% = 0.000

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Radioactivity section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

## Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

### Response to the question

This is a well-structured and well thought out piece, with a good understanding of the underlying physics. You have included most necessary sections such as safety, method and evaluation, but you are missing your preliminary work. Even just a small ...

### Response to the question

This is a well-structured and well thought out piece, with a good understanding of the underlying physics. You have included most necessary sections such as safety, method and evaluation, but you are missing your preliminary work. Even just a small paragraph stating your thoughts and choice of materials before the experiment would do, as you have not otherwise shown evidence of planning your experiment, so you could not achieve full marks. You have shown your raw data and shown the intermediate steps you have taken to determine your conclusion, which allows the reliability of your experiment to be analysed.

### Level of analysis

You have shown understanding of topics regarding your experiment, and used this to identify any problems or steps that must be taken to accurately conduct your experiment, such as testing the background radiation and removing this count from your result. You have chosen your radioactive materials well, but without information on why you chose these particular isotopes (which is a rich topic to talk about Ã¢â‚¬â€œ really an opportunity missed there) this is irrelevant as it could be luck without evidence to the contrary. The last paragraph shows a 0.000% error in the results, which is incorrect, where it should be negligible and you should talk about this fact.

### Quality of writing

Spelling and language are of a very high standard, but short, single point sentences with little punctuation such as commas are used throughout, which doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t present the good physics as well as it could. The graphs and tables are well presented and do help add to the information in the text. Appropriate scientific language and specifics is used well. The piece flows as the experiment is conducted - beginning, data collected, analysed and conclusion in order.

Reviewed by pratstercs 15/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

1. ## Is nuclear power the future? Should we build more nuclear power stations in ...

4 star(s)

A pebble bed reactor is designed to work in high temperatures in a helium atmosphere so it has no need for expensive cooling systems (huge cooling towers). Thorium reactors use thorium to make uranium-233 which can be used as a nuclear fuel.

2. ## Radioactivity Experiments: To determine the penetrating power and the range in air of the ...

pressed to freeze the measurement * Thirty seconds were left between the start of the count and the recording so the reading would be less instantaneous and more reliable * Everything was kept constant for all three experiments and the counts were recorded at regular intervals of 5 cm.

1. ## Investigate how the material of a cup affects the time it takes for the ...

Everything in the experiment should be kept the same apart from the cup, which I will change for each experiment 1. I will boil some water in a kettle 2. Measure 100ml of boiling water in a measuring cylinder 3.

2. ## Nuclear Power

table shows that nuclear power does not need a back-up this makes it reliable and efficient as like a coal-powered power station a nuclear power station can operate whenever it is needed and does not rely on other factors such as light, wind, tide like most renewable sources do.

1. ## The Importance Of Radioactive Decay And Half-Life.

Libby and his associates at the University of Chicago in 1947, are frequently useful in deciphering time-related problems in archaeology, anthropology, oceanography, pedology, climatology, and recent geology. Through metabolic activity, the level of carbon-14 in a living organism remains in constant balance with the level in the atmosphere or some

2. ## Heating and cooling revision notes for science

Energy is released when this happens. This is why steam touching your skin can cause scalds: not only is the steam hot, but energy is released into your skin as the steam condenses. Factors affecting the rate of condensation and evaporation:- The rate of condensation increases if the temperature of the gas is decreased,But the rate

1. ## Radiation: are mobile phones unsafe? Mobiles use electromagnetic radiation in order to send and ...

Sky news also did a report on mobile phones causing insomnia and reported a study which Scientists had carried out: "Scientists studied the effect of using a mobile phone before going to bed and found that those who were exposed to phone radiation took longer to reach the deeper stages of sleep and spent less time in them."

2. ## Is Nuclear power a safe and sustainable way forward?

have killed massively fewer people than the oil and coal industries. Beyond that, they say modern reactors are inherently far safer than those built 20 or 30 years ago, reducing a small risk still further. Supporters say uranium prices have remained steady for decades, meaning nuclear energy is far more secure than fossil fuels can ever be.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to