• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13

# Deviation of Light by a Prism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nigel Evans

Physics Coursework – “Deviation of Light by a Prism”

-  -

Deviation of Light by a Prism

Aim

The aim of this investigation is to test using a prism how the angle of deviation (how far the light ray is deviated from its original position) is affected by varying the angle of incidence (where the light ray goes into the prism), and whether this has any relation to the angle of emergence (where the light actually comes out of the prism).

## Planning

I firstly need to conduct theoretical work and a preliminary investigation to test what is going on and to get a clearer view of the aspects of the investigation. In my theoretical work I will have to use the geometry of triangles and Snells Law. For Snells law to work, I will need to know the refractive index of the glass that I am using. To do this I will use a glass block of the same glass as the prism, and then use sighting pins (and light) to pinpoint the incident ray and the emergence ray and then find the angle of refraction. A more detailed description of how this experiment is going to work can be seen below.

To find the refractive index of the glass that I will be using in the actual experiment, I set up a glass block that was of the same type of glass as the prism, and lined up sighting pins through it. This enables me to draw the angle of incidence (measured from the Normal (dotted line below), a line at 90° to where the incident ray strikes the glass block) and this also enables me to draw the angle of emergence (where the light exits the prism).

Middle

Sin R2 x n = Sin E

Sin 29.5° x 1.51 = 0.744

Sin-1 0.744 = 48.1°

Therefore E = 48.1°

Now that I have all for values need to calculate the deviance I again have to use the fact that X + Y = δ:

(I – R1) + (E – R2) = δ

(50 – 30.5) + (48.1 – 29.5) = δ

19.5 +18.6= 38.1°

Below is a results table of the answers that I have gained for the angles sizes using the two above methods.

Results Table for Theoretical Modelling:

 Incident Ray, I (°) Refracted Ray, R1 (°) Refracted Ray, R2 (°) Emergence Ray, E (°) Deviation, δ (°) 20 13.0913 46.9087 Not Possible Not Possible 25 16.2530 43.7470 Not Possible Not Possible 30 19.3371 40.6629 79.71 49.71 35 22.3245 37.6755 67.35 42.35 40 25.1942 34.8058 59.53 39.53 45 27.9229 32.0771 53.31 38.31 50 30.4851 29.5149 48.06 38.06 55 32.8530 27.1470 43.55 38.55 60 34.9965 25.0035 39.66 39.66 65 36.8845 23.1155 36.36 41.36 70 38.4852 21.5148 33.63 43.63 75 39.7684 20.2316 31.48 46.48 80 40.7070 19.2930 29.93 49.93 85 41.2794 18.7206 28.99 53.99 90 41.4718 18.5282 28.67 58.67

These are the calculated values for the prism, using the refractive index for the glass as 1.51. Any values before 30° are not possible because the refracted ray will appear at the wrong side of the prism. This factor makes the SINE of the angle bigger that 1 and therefore it is not possible to calculate a value for the emergence ray and also therefore not for the deviance either (as there is no emergence ray to calculate it from). The Incidence angle of 90° is also highlighted because although this value and other values above it are possible in calculation in practice the 90° angle would actually miss the prism and the values of the incidence ray above 90° would have to come from inside the prism itself. I have therefore chosen to take readings in the range of 30° - 85°. I will take one reading below 30° but this will only be taken to prove right my initial theory work and will not be taken into consideration in any conclusions that I draw.

Over the next two pages is two graphs plotted in the incident angle range of 30° - 85°, which show the predicted trend in

Conclusion

I would also maintain a sharper pencil at all times as this would make angle measuring easier, and maintain a high degree of accuracy in my investigation.

I would try and obtain a angle measuring tool that is of a better standard that a protractor and measures to a higher degree of accuracy, to ensure that all my results were very reliable.

Reliability

Overall I think my results were very reliable, and they linked back very well to my initial calculations. I think there is room for improvement as there is in any case but overall I think that my investigation was conducted reliably and to as high a degree of accuracy as the involved apparatus permitted.

Anomalous results

There were no major anomalies in my results, but having said this the two graphs that I have prepared from my results show some points that do not fit the exact trend, but they are still acceptable. An example of this is on the graph of the angle of emergence plotted against the angle of incidence, the two values of incidence angles 35° and 60° show slight bumps, even thought he line should be a perfect curve. These two could have arisen to inaccuracy on my part or for one of the reasons stated in the above sections.

The second graph of angles of deviation plotted against the angles of incidence show no real anomalous results with all points fitting the general trend of the graph in the same way that my initial calculations did (i.e. a smooth curve).

To conclude I think that given the situation and the equipment provided, I made the best use of it and even through there was room for improvement, my collected results were of a high standard as shown when comparing to my calculated values.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Waves section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Waves essays

1. ## Find the critical angle and refractive index for plastic using a graphical treatment for ...

4 star(s)

The light bent as it passed through the plastic as it was travelling through a denser medium. The ray of light was slowed down as it was passing through the plastic. Some mistakes were caused by human errors. For example, by me not using a blunt pencil, it would make my results less accurate by a slight difference.

2. ## Investigation:To find the refractive index of cooking oil.

4 star(s)

To compensate for this bump the ray box will be placed on a different surface to the container, but higher up. This would ensure that the light ray does not hit the bump, but instead travel over it. If this is not compensated for, travelling through the bump could cause the light to change direction.

1. ## Resonance of a Wine Glass

3 star(s)

So my second thought was a digital camera. This may also be better because I can then save the pictures to a disk and look them up at home where I would have more time. I used a friend take pictures of the oscilloscope while I was resonating the wine glass.

2. ## Graphs illustrating variants of y = sin x.

5 star(s)

From looking at these graphs we can determine how the number before x (this is called B) will affect the wave. Graph 6 Here we have a graph of y = sin 5x compared with y = sin x. When B>1(graph 6)

1. ## Investigating the factors which affect the sideways displacement of a light ray through a ...

explanation: When the angle of incidence is 0, there is no sideways displacement (as shown in diagram). As I increase, d must also increase. We can calculate the sideways displacement: I am going to calculate the sideways displacement for i=30 degrees: 1.

2. ## The aim of my experiment is to see what factors affect electromagnetism the most ...

So during my actual experiment I will definitely have smaller intervals, intervals of 1 should get me enough results to see any patterns. I won't start at 0 next time because I already know that it will give 0 paperclips as there is no current to give any electromagnet at

1. ## Carry out an experiment to find a relationship between the incident angle and the ...

Then, when I connect the lines on the drawing I can measure the angle of refraction with the protractor. Diagram showing the experiment Prediction When the light enters the Perspex block it will bend towards the normal. When the light exits the Perspex block it will return to its original angle.

2. ## Find a relationship between the angles of incidence and the angles of refraction by ...

Medium: The substance carrying a mechanical wave. Refraction: The bending of the direction of travel of light as it enters a medium of different optical density. Hypothesis: Due to the theory that light bends when it passes from a less dense medium to a denser medium, the light ray from

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to