Range and fair test
To make my experiment fair, I will keep the following factors of my experiment the same: -
- The amount of water used inside the beakers. This is because, if there is more water, heat convection will take longer to even out, therefore staying warmer than if there was only 50ml of water.
- The beginning temperature of the water (55ºC). This is because if the water started off at different temperatures for each experiment, my results will be inaccurate, unfair and unreliable.
- The amount of time the experiment lasts (20mins). If one experiment was taken for longer times then my range and averages will be all different and inaccurate.
- The time intervals that the temperature is taken (5mins). If the results were taken at different time intervals then the averages would be wrong. The range would also be different so that when I come to calculate the reliability, my results would be inaccurate.
- They will all have lids. If some of the experiments were taken without lids then their results will be less accurate and different to the others because it will have lost more heat due to convection.
To only part of my experiment that will be changed is the insulating material. The range of my insulators will be rockwool (fiberglass substitute), jay cloth, bubble wrap, black paper, foil and a control experiment. For my results, I will be measuring what temperature the water is for each of the insulators every 5minues for 20 minutes in total. Because this experiment is only a preliminary experiment, I will not be repeating any of the insulating materials because it is unnecessary.
Method
- Firstly I will cover 5 of the beakers around the sides with my chosen insulating materials. One of my beakers will remain with no insulating. This will be my control experiment. Place one of them on a heatproof mat. This is because I am only doing one at a time to make my results more accurate.
- Secondly boil some water in a kettle and pour 200ml of it into the beaker. Insert the thermometer and wait until it is at 55ºC.
- Place a cardboard lid to help reduce convection, onto the beaker and start the stop clock.
- Every 5 minutes take the temperature and record it in a table of results. Before I take the temperature, I will stir the water around to prevent convection in the water, which will affect my results. I will continue this for 20mins. This will provide my results for my preliminary and help give me an idea about my full investigation.
- Repeat the experiment for the other insulating materials and the control experiment.
Results
My preliminary results show that the most affective insulator (excluding the control experiment) was the rockwool, followed very closely by the bubble wrap, then the silver foil, then the jay cloth and finally the black paper. These results show that my prediction that I made for my prelim was fairly accurate. The only part that did not relate to my results was that the rockwool was slightly more efficient then the bubble wrap. My preliminary results will help my prediction for my main investigation and help improve my range.
MAIN INVESTIGAITON
Range and fair test
To make my experiment fair, I will keep the following factors of my experiment the same: -
- The amount of water used inside the beakers.
- The beginning temperature of the water (55ºC).
- The amount of time the experiment lasts (30mins).
- The time intervals that the temperature is taken (2mins).
- They will all have lids.
To only part of my experiment that will be changed is the insulating material. The range of my insulators will remain the same as for my preliminary investigation. For my results, I will be measuring what temperature the water is for each of the insulators every 2 minutes for 30 minutes in total. Recording the temperature every 2 minutes instead of 5 will make my results more accurate and reliable. I will do this for 30 minutes instead of 20 so that I get a better line of best fit on my graph and get more reliable results. Also making the experiment longer will help my conclusion. To make my results more reliable, I will repeat each insulating material three times then work out an average.
Prediction
This time, because of the results from my preliminary experiment, I predict that out of my 5 chosen insulators, the most efficient will be the rockwool. I believe this because it is very thick and contains still air. It is a good insulator because convection currents cannot form because the air is not moving. I believe that the second best insulator will be the bubble wrap, and then the third best of my insulating materials will be the sliver foil, the fourth best insulator will be a jay cloth and again I believe that out of all of my insulating materials the worst one will be the black paper.
Method
- Firstly I will cover 5 of the beakers around the sides with my chosen insulating materials. One of my beakers will remain with no insulating. This will be my control experiment. Place one of them on a heatproof mat. This is because I am only doing one at a time to make my results more accurate.
- Secondly boil some water in a kettle and pour 200ml of it into the beaker. Insert the thermometer and wait until it is at 55ºC.
- Place a cardboard lid to help reduce convection, onto the beaker and start the stop clock.
- Every 2 minutes take the temperature and record it in a table of results. Before I take the temperature, I will stir the water around to prevent convection in the water, which will affect my results. I will continue this for 30mins.
- Repeat the experiment three times with each of the insulating materials
- Repeat the experiment for the other insulating materials and the control experiment.
Results
Uiuyi = odd results
My results and my graph show that the best insulator was the rockwool. This is because the rockwool is a very thick layer of insulation. It also contains pockets of still air. Still air is a good insulator because conduction currents are unable to form because the air molecules are unable to move. The fact that rockwool was the best insulator supports my prediction. The worst insulator was the black paper and the bubble wrap. This does not support my conclusion and was even stranger with the fact that they lost more heat than the control experiment. However I did predict that the black paper would be one of the worst insulators. This is because the black paper absorbs the infrared radiation so it is a better emitter than a reflector. However the black paper is a very poor conductor because the particle structure is very dense and thick so the conduction currents are unable to move around as freely. The reason that bubble wrap was a poor insulator was very strange. It may be due to odd results that were recorded. The reason that bubble wrap should have been a good insulator is because it contains large pockets of still air. Plastic is also a good insulator because it is made up of many layers, which has still air in between each layer. After rockwool the next best insulator was the jay cloth. This is very surprising as it is not very thick and is a very bad insulator when wet. However, the jay cloth is a net design, which traps air and is made of several layers, which also contains air. It is also a very bad conductor because it is a dense particle structure. Then the middle insulator was the silver foil as I predicted. This is very good at insulating against infrared radiation because the shiny surface reflects the energy. The poor point to this insulator is that it is a good conductor because of free particles that allows conduction currents to move faster and easier.
According to my graph, the steeper the line of best fit is, then the faster the temperature dropped, therefore the less reliable the insulator was. My graph shows that most of the insulators had a steady drop in temperature and that the range between the results is very small.
Evaluation
I believe that my results are fairly good. But to prove this I will calculate the reliability of my second result, middle result and end result for each insulator. The reason that I will not be doing my beginning result is because they are all the same and will all therefore, be 100% reliable. The formula for this is:
Reliability = Range x 100
Average
The higher the percentage, the less reliable the results are. For example, 100% will be very unreliable but 0% will be very reliable. As a guideline, if my results are above 10% I will say they are unreliable. If they fall below 10% but above 5% they are fairly reliable and below 5% they are reliable.
As you can see my results are mostly reliable. The reason that some may not be reliable is because the material may have got wet which would affect the conduction prevention. Water is a very good conductor because the convection currents pass easily from particle to particle.
What was good about my chosen method was that it was easy to set up and produces fairly accurate results. It was very simple but got me what I wanted. Also it was the best possible method as I had a very limited time restraint. It covered the fact that heat could be lost by convection and I found ways to prevent that by placing a lid on the beaker. I feel that the method did not really have any bad points. However to make my results more accurate I could use a digital thermometer that counts the temperature to two decimal places. I could also use plastic or glass lids instead of cardboard ones. These will be more reliable at keeping in heat.
For additional experiments that involve investigating insulation I could experiment on these factors: -
- Different containers. Instead of glass beakers, which are very good insulators, I could experiment on using other containers. Like copper cans or instead of a beaker I could use a conical flask, which has a slender neck and a smaller lid.
- How the colour of the material affects the infrared radiation.
- How convection affects the loss of heat.