[Reactivity Series]
Potassium (K)
Sodium (Na)
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium (Mg)
(Aluminium Al)
(Zinc Zn)
(Iron Fe)
(Lead Pb)
(Copper Cu)
(Silver Ag)
(Platinum Pt)
Prediction.
In this experiment I will be using copper (cu) as the ‘control’, then testing other metals against it to see if the voltage increases. My prediction is that the voltage will increase between copper and a metal, if the metal is much higher in the reactivity series when compared to copper. My reasons behind this are to do with the atom shell theory, the more reactive the metal is, the more generous it is at allowing electrons to flow from it to the next. This means that Un-reactive metals are not so generous at allowing the electrons to flow, therefore it will only receive electrons from a more reactive metal.
Method and Apparatus.
- Set up equipment as shown
- Making sure voltmeter is attached to both metals. Read voltage from voltmeter and record data.
- Repeat steps above, using new water, to gather a sensible average.
Safety and Fair testing.
Safety equipment supplied (safety goggles, etc) must be worn at all times, following all correct procedures as explained in the school labs.
To ensure that the experiment is fair and accurate, repeat the experiment a number of times ensuring that on each of these occasions you use equal and correct measurements.
Conclusion
After conducting the experiment I was able to compile to following results, which are displayed in the chart above.
The finding clearly demonstrates the relationship between the reactivity of metals and the electricity given off. All metals I tested were above Copper in the reactivity series so a higher amount of volts were produced (none of the metals went into minus readings).
When looking at the chart above it almost demonstrates a clear pattern of increase rising from iron at 0.30 to magnesium at 1.31. With the exception of aluminium, which gave a lower reading of 0.66 compared to zinc (lower in the reactivity series) at 0.80, this is due to aluminium reacting with the air (almost immediately) to form a covering of aluminium oxide over the metal, so has influenced the results.
These findings support my prediction and demonstrate that the atom theory, as explained earlier, is correct.
Evaluation
The experiment was carried out successfully and produced the predicted results, great care was taken to ensure that the accuracy of the readings from the volt meter were correctly recorded, to verify the readings were accurate the experiment was conducted 6 times, to avoid any anomalies, this was greatly assisted by the simplicity of the experiment.
Should this experiment be repeated certain adjustments could be introduced to see if the results would be affected. For example, the level of water in the beaker could be varied, along with the type of liquid used (e.g. a form of acid) to see if this produced differing results. Also the size of metals could be increased/decreased to check an affect on the outcome. It would also be interesting to see if the temperature of the liquid used in the experiment has any affect on the results.