• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

Early Humans?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In order to understand our universal traits, and how we came to be who we are, and to understand our place in this world and how we came to be here at all, it is fundamental to glean a more complete understanding of our origins. This search for our origins, to determine who the first hominin was, when they lived, and whether they contributed any genetic material to modern humans is a primary objective of paleoanthropology. It requires reconstructing the human lineage back to its roots, beyond the point where hominins and apes diverged from their common ancestor. Molecular testing indicates this divergence occurred between five and eight million years ago (Lewin & Foley, 2004). More precise timing, the location, and the mechanisms of this split remain debated. The questions remain unresolved partly because the fossil record is inordinately sparse. The visual representation of human evolution remains an unruly tree with many gaping holes. Fossil discoveries in the past fifteen years have produced more questions than they have answered. The task is rendered yet more difficult by paleoanthropologists inability to agree on a coherent lineage; indeed some of their debate seems more like bickering than scholarly discourse. When Don Johanson and his team discovered Lucy, in 1974, they pushed the human lineage back a million years (Johanson & Edey, 1981). Australopithecus afarensis lived roughly between 3 and 4 million years ago, a million years before its possible successor, A. africanus. In 1992 Ardipithecus ramidus, was discovered in Ethiopia and replaced Australopithecus afarensis as the oldest known hominin (White et. al., 1994). This discovery ushered in a new focus for many paleoanthropologiss; to discover the earliest hominin, that first bipedal ape that is ultimately an ancestor to modern humans. In the subsequent decade, five potential hominin species, each one older and more controversial, were discovered. Currently there are four contenders for the start of the human race: Ardipithecus ramidus, Ardipithecus kadabba, Orrorin tugenensis, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis (Gibbons, 2006). ...read more.

Middle

And like Ar. ramidus, this location has presented geological and paleobiological data that demonstrates this earliest hominin derives from a relatively wet and wooded environment that was modulated by tectonic, volcanic and litoral processes. The accompanying fossil faunal remains support this (Wolde-Gabriel et. al., 2001). Ar. kadabba's combination of derived and primitive traits has led some to contest its hominin status and claim that it is an ancestor of modern chimpanzees. Early hominins can be expected to show a mosaic of ape- and human-like characters. Ar. kadabba's classification is based on its dental fossils. The severe lack of postcranial remains and the transitional teeth makes it impossible to prove that this new discovery is a hominin. Two paleoanthropologists who dispute Ar. kadabba's status as a hominin are Martin Pickford and Brigitte Senut, who discovered even older fossils in the Lukeino formation at the Tugen Hills of Kenya. The volcanic tuff layer these fossils were found in dates to between 5.8 and 6.1 million years ago. They designated a new genus for their potential species, naming it Orrorin tugenensis, which translated to 'Original Man from Tugen' (Pickford & Senut, 2001). So far 20 fossils have been found, most from the expeditions in 2000 and 2001, but one from 1974 whose phylogenetic status has been contentious since its discovery (Gibbons, 2006). The bones come from at least 5 individuals and consist of several limb bone fragments, including a femur and humerus, several mandibular fragments, a single manual phalanx, and some assorted, isolated teeth. As with Ar. kadabba dental remains of O. tugenensis are the most plentiful fossils. The upper incisor is described as robust, and is smaller in size than Australopithecus and similar in size to Ardipithecus. Like all other known hominins (except Ardipithecus) O. tugenensis has thick enamel. It is about the same thickness as modern H. sapiens. Its small molars are also comparable in size and shape to modern humans (Pickford & Senut, 2001). ...read more.

Conclusion

This hominin falls within the range of variation of A. afarensis and may eventually prove to be A. afarensis, but regardless Brunet has demonstrated that early hominins occupied a much wider area than previously thought. If S. tchadensis is proven to be a hominin, it may indicate that human evolution occurred in central Africa rather than West Africa as previously assumed (Gibbons, 2006). The fossils from Chad provide further evidence that the earliest humans likely inhabited a wooded, forested environment. The rich fauna from the Toros-Menalla layer includes a significant aquatic component including fish, crocodiles and amphibious mammals, as well as those associated with gallery forest and savannah, such as primates, rodents, equids, bovids, and elephants (Vignaud et. al., 2002). Brunet assumes that S. tchadensis lived near a lake but not far from a desert; this is the oldest record of desert conditions in the Neogene of northern central Africa. Paleoanthropologists have already begun to reconsider the environment in which the ape-hominin split occurred and they may soon have to reconsider the geographical location as well. New fossil discoveries raise new debates regarding the origins of our species and its evolution. Old assumptions are tossed out, new hypothesis are supported. None of these four species can yet be definitively labeled a hominin, and the human phylogenetic tree revised and redrawn. The paleoanthropologists must first unearth further postcranial remains to prove conclusively that 'their' potential hominins were obligate bipeds, which is the defining characteristic of humankind (Gibbons, 2006). Many fossil finds have undergone periods of intense criticism where notable researchers have denied the remains belonged to a hominin, these arguments were only resolved with the discovery of new fossil evidence. Re-examination of previous finds can seldom resolve complex issues of fossil morphologies and evolutionary relationships. Until this new evidence is found the paleoanthropological community will debate on. And, while it remains unsure which species may have contributed what traits to human evolution, it seems certain that the more we can learn of the roots of our phylogenetic tree the more we can learn of the roots of what defines us as human beings. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Living Things in their Environment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Living Things in their Environment essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Animal Testing

    4 star(s)

    So, anti-vivisectionists say this study proves that animal testing is unsuitable for testing human drugs. Testing Cosmetic and Household Products: Anti-vivisectionists argue that animals suffer unnecessarily for testing of luxury products and that it is not needed. In Britain animal testing for cosmetics was banned in the 1990s however the

  2. Animal behaviour and research into attitudes on animal testing.

    Some animals have been able to use their dexterity and produce tools, which would help them gather food. The skills required to use tools were only thought to be possessed by humans, since they require some intelligence, but primates have been known to use tool for simple jobs such as getting food.

  1. I will be answering the question: is animal testing right or wrong? To be ...

    * Computer models are other types of methods of testing are still not advanced enough so animal testing must continue. * Animal testing is cruel because animals have to go through a lot of stress and which can lead into their death.

  2. An Investigation into the water quality of the River Banwell in

    Disturb the floor using an object into the direction of the net and collect the sediment sample. 3. Remove the net and place collection into a bag, which is labelled. Repeat until enough is collected to get a good sense of the species living in the river.

  1. Scottish Seagrass Communities of the Genus Zostera

    All three species are found in Scottish coastal waters forming Zostera communities, SM1 classification (Rodwell 2000). There are non significant Zostera populations between Berwick and Dunbar and between Montrose Basin and the Moray Firth. This is assumed to be mainly due to a lack of suitable habitat (Cleator 1993).

  2. Is the preferred habitat of moss on the North side of a Yew Tree ...

    In the forest I double checked my moss coverage calculations to ensure I hadn't counted them incorrectly. When sampling the data I will also try to refer back to the plant species pamphlet to ensure I was not confusing moss with other similar species such as lichen.

  1. Compare and contrast the morphological features of Lamellibranches and Brachiopods

    The line along which the mantle is attached to the interior of the shell is called the pallial sinus and is often preserved in fossils. Opening and closing of shell is accomplished by adductor muscles, which leaves two scars on each valve.

  2. An investigation into whether varying light intensity at a stream affects the species diversity

    The pH ranged between pH7.5 and pH 8.0 which is not a significant differecen to affect the species present. Water dissociates using the equation : H2O ? H+ + OH-. The number of grammes of hydrogen ions per litre is a measure of the pH.Hard waterwith high calcium content has ahigh pH value as it is alkaline.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work