• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Efficiency of energy transfer on a rolling object

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Holly O’Nione 11HO

 Aim: To investigate the efficiency of energy transfer on a rolling object.

To do this I will investigate the input variable which is the factor we’re changing. I shall change the height of the slope, which therefore means the input variable is the gravitational potential energy (G.P.E) as the height moved affects it.

Prediction

I predict that the transfer of energy will be more efficient the steeper the slope gets. This is because as the slope gets steeper, the marble will rotate less and less (so less rotational energy) and make less and less contact , and when the slope has a gradient of 100%, the marble will not rotate at all, but just fall straight down.  

image00.png

The marble’s energy changes from G.P.E, as it falls vertically, to kinetic energy. However, as it comes down the slope it rotates. Some energy is lost as rotational energy.

G.P.E = K.E + Rotational Energy

Therefore I will need to measure the velocity at the bottom as there is no Kinetic Energy (K.E) or rotational energy is at the top.

I will need to find out the efficiency of the energy transfer from G.P.E to K.E. The formula is:

Efficiency = Useful energy transferred (KE) x 100

                   Total energy supplied (GPE)

To work this out I need to know the G.P.E the marble has at the top (therefore the maximum G.P.E)

...read more.

Middle

th of a second and the time I will repeat the timing five times for each height and use the average of these five results. This will make the investigation reliable as it will reduce the effect of anomalous results.  

When I record the time it will be made to two decimal places as the stopwatch limits me by only showing this amount of accuracy.  For length and height it will be measured in metres to the nearest millimetre (three decimal places) because this is quite easy to see on the ruler. This is as accurate as the ruler will allow.

Before I do my actual investigation, I shall carry out a preliminary experiment in order to see if I need to make changes to my plan.  The preliminary procedure will include three heights:

0.200m, 0.400m and 0.600m

I shall do 5 repeats for each and work out an average and the efficiency which should not exceed 100%.

Results for Preliminary Procedure

Height (m)

Time 1 (s)

Time 2 (s)

Time 3 (s)

Time 4 (s)

Time 5 (s)

Avg Time (s)

Efficiency (%)

0.200

2.50

2.60

2.44

2.50

2.40

2.488

64.52

0.400

1.75

1.69

1.79

1.72

1.66

1.722

67.60

0.600

1.40

1.38

1.47

1.40

1.34

1.398

68.22

This shows what I expected as the efficiency increased each time. Therefore I should keep the same amount of repeats. However, I should do more measurements with a greater range (8 measurements) and smaller interval (0.100m). In my actual investigation I shall use the following heights:

0.100m

0.200m

0.300m

0.400m

0.

...read more.

Conclusion

This is probably because I was more alert at the beginning of the experiment and so my reaction time was shorter. Apart from this I cannot see any reason why the first readings I took were anomalous.

However, I do think that my evidence is valid because I kept all factors which could affect the experiment constant apart from the input variable of the height.

 I do not think that I have collected enough evidence to fully support my conclusion.  In order to do this, I must do the experiment again. Next time I shall use a larger range of heights so I can see if the trend continues.  Also, if there is a larger range, an anomaly will not show up as obviously on the graph.  I would not repeat the experiment any more than I did this time as more repeats wouldn’t affect the average much more.

I did not have many difficulties in this experiment except with the timing. If I were to do this experiment again, I would use light, motion or pressure sensors which are connected to a computer to record the times. I would do this because a computer’s reaction time is very accurate.

 To obtain more evidence to support my conclusion, I would use a greater range of heights. Another way to do this is to shorten the intervals. The experiment would still have a range of heights from 0.100m to 0.800, but it is conducted every centimetre instead of every ten centimetres.  This would make the trend much clearer. Therefore, this would make the trend and therefore my conclusion clearer.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigate the relationship between GPE (Gravitational Potential Energy) and KE (Kinetic Energy) for a ...

    3 star(s)

    It also showed me that keeping the length of the starting point on the ramp the same was a reasonable decision.

  2. To investigate how the angle of a slope affects the acceleration of a marble.

    This will make the angles more accurate. Heights of top of slopes for required angles: 10 o = Sin 10 x 150 = 26cm 20 o = Sin 20 x 150 = 51cm 30 o = Sin 30 x 150 = 75cm 40 o = Sin 40 x 150 =

  1. Investigation into factors affecting the speed of a car rolling down a ramp

    0.58 0.85 25 31 0.62 0.58 0.94 30 0.60 0.58 0.97 29 0.58 0.58 1.00 30 27 0.54 0.58 1.07 28 0.56 0.58 1.04 26 0.52 0.58 1.12 35 24 0.48 0.58 1.21 23 0.46 0.58 1.26 24 0.48 0.58 1.21 There has obviously been acceleration while the car was rolling down the ramp.

  2. The aim of this experiment is to obtain the efficiency of a supplied catapult.

    By conducting a small experiment on the elastic used in my catapult in which I will measure values of force against extension, I will be able to plot a graph and calculate the area underneath in order to obtain a value that will represent the elastic energy in the material.

  1. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    of mass on the trolley, if this were chosen as the final variable. 3. The surface of the runway and flat ramp. This was varied using the bare wood of the runway and ramp as the smooth surface and kitchen roll as the rough surface.

  2. Investigate a factor that might affect the size of a crater made by a ...

    these intervals were not large enough to ensure some diversity in the results so they were changed to intervals of 1/2 a meter, again up to 2.5m. The method of measuring the heights was originally someone holding the meter rule while someone else dropped the object but this proved inaccurate

  1. Forces and Energy Transfer.

    football, the football kicks you back as such * Why is it a bad idea to drive into a concrete post at 70 KPH? * According to Newtons 3^rd law the block will apply the same force on the car as the car applies on the block.

  2. Motion of an object as it slides down a slope at different angles to ...

    Otherwise the surfaces in contact are not the same and the calculations will become too heavy * The angle at which the gutter makes with the table/horizontal is constant even when the object is dropping. Since the gutter is rigid in real life situation this should not be too untrue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work