• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Efficiency of energy transfer on a rolling object

Extracts from this document...


Holly O’Nione 11HO

 Aim: To investigate the efficiency of energy transfer on a rolling object.

To do this I will investigate the input variable which is the factor we’re changing. I shall change the height of the slope, which therefore means the input variable is the gravitational potential energy (G.P.E) as the height moved affects it.


I predict that the transfer of energy will be more efficient the steeper the slope gets. This is because as the slope gets steeper, the marble will rotate less and less (so less rotational energy) and make less and less contact , and when the slope has a gradient of 100%, the marble will not rotate at all, but just fall straight down.  


The marble’s energy changes from G.P.E, as it falls vertically, to kinetic energy. However, as it comes down the slope it rotates. Some energy is lost as rotational energy.

G.P.E = K.E + Rotational Energy

Therefore I will need to measure the velocity at the bottom as there is no Kinetic Energy (K.E) or rotational energy is at the top.

I will need to find out the efficiency of the energy transfer from G.P.E to K.E. The formula is:

Efficiency = Useful energy transferred (KE) x 100

                   Total energy supplied (GPE)

To work this out I need to know the G.P.E the marble has at the top (therefore the maximum G.P.E)

...read more.


th of a second and the time I will repeat the timing five times for each height and use the average of these five results. This will make the investigation reliable as it will reduce the effect of anomalous results.  

When I record the time it will be made to two decimal places as the stopwatch limits me by only showing this amount of accuracy.  For length and height it will be measured in metres to the nearest millimetre (three decimal places) because this is quite easy to see on the ruler. This is as accurate as the ruler will allow.

Before I do my actual investigation, I shall carry out a preliminary experiment in order to see if I need to make changes to my plan.  The preliminary procedure will include three heights:

0.200m, 0.400m and 0.600m

I shall do 5 repeats for each and work out an average and the efficiency which should not exceed 100%.

Results for Preliminary Procedure

Height (m)

Time 1 (s)

Time 2 (s)

Time 3 (s)

Time 4 (s)

Time 5 (s)

Avg Time (s)

Efficiency (%)

























This shows what I expected as the efficiency increased each time. Therefore I should keep the same amount of repeats. However, I should do more measurements with a greater range (8 measurements) and smaller interval (0.100m). In my actual investigation I shall use the following heights:






...read more.


This is probably because I was more alert at the beginning of the experiment and so my reaction time was shorter. Apart from this I cannot see any reason why the first readings I took were anomalous.

However, I do think that my evidence is valid because I kept all factors which could affect the experiment constant apart from the input variable of the height.

 I do not think that I have collected enough evidence to fully support my conclusion.  In order to do this, I must do the experiment again. Next time I shall use a larger range of heights so I can see if the trend continues.  Also, if there is a larger range, an anomaly will not show up as obviously on the graph.  I would not repeat the experiment any more than I did this time as more repeats wouldn’t affect the average much more.

I did not have many difficulties in this experiment except with the timing. If I were to do this experiment again, I would use light, motion or pressure sensors which are connected to a computer to record the times. I would do this because a computer’s reaction time is very accurate.

 To obtain more evidence to support my conclusion, I would use a greater range of heights. Another way to do this is to shorten the intervals. The experiment would still have a range of heights from 0.100m to 0.800, but it is conducted every centimetre instead of every ten centimetres.  This would make the trend much clearer. Therefore, this would make the trend and therefore my conclusion clearer.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigate the relationship between GPE (Gravitational Potential Energy) and KE (Kinetic Energy) for a ...

    3 star(s)

    0.40185 0.15 0.5 4740.25 0.10548 0.21096 0.15 0.5 5631.79 0.08878 0.17756 0.15 0.5 5434.65 0.09200 0.18400 0.15 0.5 4856.03 0.10296 0.20593 0.15 0.5 3234.97 0.15456 0.30912 Average: 0.26304 Height (m) Length (m) Time (ms) Average Speed (m/s) Final Speed (m/s)

  2. To investigate how the angle of a slope affects the acceleration of a marble.

    The frictional and rotational effects would have absorbed energy from the marble causing it to be slowed down. This means the marble in my experiment could not have accelerated as quickly as the calculated results show. From this I can conclude that the steeper the slope the faster the acceleration.

  1. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    A metre rule- this was used to measure the height of elevation on one end of the runway and the length of the runway. A set square- this was used to make sure the picket fence was perpendicular to the trolley and the light gate was perpendicular to the picket fence on the trolley.

  2. Investigate a factor that might affect the size of a crater made by a ...

    of the crater was reduced from 150ml to 100ml as the sand was already quite damp and the 150ml amount was decided based on dry sand such as in the pre test. It was cut to 100ml as not to affect the results by having water accumulating in the craters, which would prove difficult for measuring.

  1. Investigation into factors affecting the speed of a car rolling down a ramp

    1.93 1.00 2.00 30 1.07 2.15 2.15 1.04 2.07 1.12 2.23 35 1.21 2.42 2.44 1.26 2.52 1.21 2.42 With these results I can now plot a suitable scatter graph to show how the height of the ramp affects the speed of the car: Analysis From the graph plotted directly

  2. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    Improvements in my final experiment: ? The trolley will be started 150cm from the bottom of the runway, in order to make the movement of the trolley more accurate. ? The trolley will be released and the power pack started at the same time by myself, this is to avoid the delay in reaction time between pupils.

  1. Investigation to Determine how the Height of a slope Affects the Speed of an ...

    either the marble will stop completely or it will slow down so much that the speed on the run-off distance will be a lot slower than the speed of the object at the bottom of the slope and that is what we are trying to work out.

  2. The Flywheel as an Alternative Energy Storage Device for Electric Vehicles (EV): Problems Associated ...

    The flywheel has been under intensive development by many research firms for decades. The introduction of a magnetic bearing system has eliminated most (but not all) of the friction that could possibly slow the flywheel down. High strength materials are chosen to create the containment vessel, which safely cradles the flywheel assembly and prevents exploding if the flywheel fails.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work